Reciprocal expressions and the Maximal Typicality Hypothesis

In two experiments, we study the effects of verb concepts on the interpretation of reciprocal expressions in Dutch and Hebrew. One experiment studies Hebrew to test a previous account, the Strongest Meaning Hypothesis, which suggests that listeners resolve ambiguity in reciprocal sentences using the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eva B. Poortman, Marijn E. Struiksma, Nir Kerem, Naama Friedmann, Yoad Winter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Open Library of Humanities 2018-02-01
Series:Glossa
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/180
id doaj-bcb7badb13dc463f96a77a2c5b74d9d4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bcb7badb13dc463f96a77a2c5b74d9d42021-09-02T06:06:02ZengOpen Library of HumanitiesGlossa2397-18352018-02-013110.5334/gjgl.180181Reciprocal expressions and the Maximal Typicality HypothesisEva B. Poortman0Marijn E. Struiksma1Nir Kerem2Naama Friedmann3Yoad Winter4Utrecht University, Trans 10, 3512 JK, UtrechtUtrecht University, Trans 10, 3512 JK, UtrechtGoogle Israel Ltd., Yigal Alon 98, Tel Aviv 6789141Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978Utrecht University, Trans 10, 3512 JK, UtrechtIn two experiments, we study the effects of verb concepts on the interpretation of reciprocal expressions in Dutch and Hebrew. One experiment studies Hebrew to test a previous account, the Strongest Meaning Hypothesis, which suggests that listeners resolve ambiguity in reciprocal sentences using the logically strongest meaning that is consistent with the context. The results challenge this proposal, as participants often adopt a weaker meaning than what the Strongest Meaning Hypothesis expects. We propose that these results reflect the sensitivity of reciprocal quantifiers to verb concepts, which is modelled by a new principle, the 'Maximal Typicality Hypothesis '(MTH). For any given reciprocal sentence, the MTH specifies a 'core situation': the maximal situation that is also maximally typical for the verb concept. The MTH predicts reciprocal sentences to be maximally acceptable in the core situation and, under certain conditions, in situations that contain it, but substantially less acceptable in other situations. To test this prediction, we conducted a two-part experiment among Dutch speakers: (a) a membership test that ranks typicality preferences with different verbs; (b) a truth-value judgement test with reciprocal sentences containing these verbs. The results show that the typical number of patients per agent varies between verbs, with a significant effect of these preferences on reciprocal quantification: the stronger the verb concept’s bias is for one-patient situations, the weaker is the interpretation of reciprocal sentences containing it. These results support the MTH as a basis for a general theory of reciprocal quantification.https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/180conceptstypicality effectsreciprocityStrongest Meaning Hypothesis (SMH)Maximal Typicality Hypothesis (MTH)
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eva B. Poortman
Marijn E. Struiksma
Nir Kerem
Naama Friedmann
Yoad Winter
spellingShingle Eva B. Poortman
Marijn E. Struiksma
Nir Kerem
Naama Friedmann
Yoad Winter
Reciprocal expressions and the Maximal Typicality Hypothesis
Glossa
concepts
typicality effects
reciprocity
Strongest Meaning Hypothesis (SMH)
Maximal Typicality Hypothesis (MTH)
author_facet Eva B. Poortman
Marijn E. Struiksma
Nir Kerem
Naama Friedmann
Yoad Winter
author_sort Eva B. Poortman
title Reciprocal expressions and the Maximal Typicality Hypothesis
title_short Reciprocal expressions and the Maximal Typicality Hypothesis
title_full Reciprocal expressions and the Maximal Typicality Hypothesis
title_fullStr Reciprocal expressions and the Maximal Typicality Hypothesis
title_full_unstemmed Reciprocal expressions and the Maximal Typicality Hypothesis
title_sort reciprocal expressions and the maximal typicality hypothesis
publisher Open Library of Humanities
series Glossa
issn 2397-1835
publishDate 2018-02-01
description In two experiments, we study the effects of verb concepts on the interpretation of reciprocal expressions in Dutch and Hebrew. One experiment studies Hebrew to test a previous account, the Strongest Meaning Hypothesis, which suggests that listeners resolve ambiguity in reciprocal sentences using the logically strongest meaning that is consistent with the context. The results challenge this proposal, as participants often adopt a weaker meaning than what the Strongest Meaning Hypothesis expects. We propose that these results reflect the sensitivity of reciprocal quantifiers to verb concepts, which is modelled by a new principle, the 'Maximal Typicality Hypothesis '(MTH). For any given reciprocal sentence, the MTH specifies a 'core situation': the maximal situation that is also maximally typical for the verb concept. The MTH predicts reciprocal sentences to be maximally acceptable in the core situation and, under certain conditions, in situations that contain it, but substantially less acceptable in other situations. To test this prediction, we conducted a two-part experiment among Dutch speakers: (a) a membership test that ranks typicality preferences with different verbs; (b) a truth-value judgement test with reciprocal sentences containing these verbs. The results show that the typical number of patients per agent varies between verbs, with a significant effect of these preferences on reciprocal quantification: the stronger the verb concept’s bias is for one-patient situations, the weaker is the interpretation of reciprocal sentences containing it. These results support the MTH as a basis for a general theory of reciprocal quantification.
topic concepts
typicality effects
reciprocity
Strongest Meaning Hypothesis (SMH)
Maximal Typicality Hypothesis (MTH)
url https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/180
work_keys_str_mv AT evabpoortman reciprocalexpressionsandthemaximaltypicalityhypothesis
AT marijnestruiksma reciprocalexpressionsandthemaximaltypicalityhypothesis
AT nirkerem reciprocalexpressionsandthemaximaltypicalityhypothesis
AT naamafriedmann reciprocalexpressionsandthemaximaltypicalityhypothesis
AT yoadwinter reciprocalexpressionsandthemaximaltypicalityhypothesis
_version_ 1721179209113534464