Time Is Money: The Effect of Mode-of-Thought on Financial Decision-Making

The dual-system approach holds that deliberative decisions and in-depth evaluation processes lead people to better financial decisions. However, research identifies situations where optimal economic decisions may stem from a more intuitive decision process. In the current work, we present three expe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lidor Krava, Shahar Ayal, Guy Hochman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.735823/full
id doaj-bcac440a44a34f1483225f7a811479cd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bcac440a44a34f1483225f7a811479cd2021-09-27T06:23:02ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782021-09-011210.3389/fpsyg.2021.735823735823Time Is Money: The Effect of Mode-of-Thought on Financial Decision-MakingLidor KravaShahar AyalGuy HochmanThe dual-system approach holds that deliberative decisions and in-depth evaluation processes lead people to better financial decisions. However, research identifies situations where optimal economic decisions may stem from a more intuitive decision process. In the current work, we present three experimental studies that examined how these two modes-of-thought affect financial decisions. In Study 1, deliberative processes were indeed associated with better one-shot descriptive-based financial decisions. However, Study 2 showed that when participants were asked to make repeated decisions and were required to learn from their experience, the advantage of deliberative over intuitive processes was eliminated. In addition, when participants employed intuitive processes, the quality of their financial decisions improved significantly with experience. Finally, Study 3 showed that the deliberative processing style may lose its advantage when information is not fully available. Overall, these findings suggest that deliberation may contribute to financial decision-making in one-shot decisions. However, when information is lacking, and decisions are repetitive, intuitive processes might be just as good.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.735823/fulldecision qualitydual-systeminformation processing styletime pressureutility maximizing
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lidor Krava
Shahar Ayal
Guy Hochman
spellingShingle Lidor Krava
Shahar Ayal
Guy Hochman
Time Is Money: The Effect of Mode-of-Thought on Financial Decision-Making
Frontiers in Psychology
decision quality
dual-system
information processing style
time pressure
utility maximizing
author_facet Lidor Krava
Shahar Ayal
Guy Hochman
author_sort Lidor Krava
title Time Is Money: The Effect of Mode-of-Thought on Financial Decision-Making
title_short Time Is Money: The Effect of Mode-of-Thought on Financial Decision-Making
title_full Time Is Money: The Effect of Mode-of-Thought on Financial Decision-Making
title_fullStr Time Is Money: The Effect of Mode-of-Thought on Financial Decision-Making
title_full_unstemmed Time Is Money: The Effect of Mode-of-Thought on Financial Decision-Making
title_sort time is money: the effect of mode-of-thought on financial decision-making
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2021-09-01
description The dual-system approach holds that deliberative decisions and in-depth evaluation processes lead people to better financial decisions. However, research identifies situations where optimal economic decisions may stem from a more intuitive decision process. In the current work, we present three experimental studies that examined how these two modes-of-thought affect financial decisions. In Study 1, deliberative processes were indeed associated with better one-shot descriptive-based financial decisions. However, Study 2 showed that when participants were asked to make repeated decisions and were required to learn from their experience, the advantage of deliberative over intuitive processes was eliminated. In addition, when participants employed intuitive processes, the quality of their financial decisions improved significantly with experience. Finally, Study 3 showed that the deliberative processing style may lose its advantage when information is not fully available. Overall, these findings suggest that deliberation may contribute to financial decision-making in one-shot decisions. However, when information is lacking, and decisions are repetitive, intuitive processes might be just as good.
topic decision quality
dual-system
information processing style
time pressure
utility maximizing
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.735823/full
work_keys_str_mv AT lidorkrava timeismoneytheeffectofmodeofthoughtonfinancialdecisionmaking
AT shaharayal timeismoneytheeffectofmodeofthoughtonfinancialdecisionmaking
AT guyhochman timeismoneytheeffectofmodeofthoughtonfinancialdecisionmaking
_version_ 1716867119643099136