Feasibility of incorporating computertailored health behaviour communications in primary care settings

Background We set out to investigate the feasibility of incorporating a computer-tailored health behaviour program into routine care in a group of primary care practices in Rhode Island. Methods Two existing computer programs (physical activity, smoking) that tailored text and graphical feedback to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christopher Sciamanna, Bess Marcus, Michael Goldstein, Kipp Lawrence, Sue Swartz, Beth Bock, Amanda Graham, David Ahern
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT 2004-02-01
Series:Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hijournal.bcs.org/index.php/jhi/article/view/107
id doaj-bca98258c7714b8ebaaf47efb2f1904e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bca98258c7714b8ebaaf47efb2f1904e2020-11-24T20:40:35ZengBCS, The Chartered Institute for ITJournal of Innovation in Health Informatics2058-45552058-45632004-02-01121404810.14236/jhi.v12i1.10786Feasibility of incorporating computertailored health behaviour communications in primary care settingsChristopher SciamannaBess MarcusMichael GoldsteinKipp LawrenceSue SwartzBeth BockAmanda GrahamDavid AhernBackground We set out to investigate the feasibility of incorporating a computer-tailored health behaviour program into routine care in a group of primary care practices in Rhode Island. Methods Two existing computer programs (physical activity, smoking) that tailored text and graphical feedback to survey responses were combined and adapted for use in primary care directly by patients. Ten primary care practices were recruited and worked closely with project staff to develop a practice-specific plan for incorporating the program into the workflow and office routine. Feasibility was measured by the percentage of patients who used the program during the day of their visit. Results Only one of the ten offices was able to successfully incorporate the program into their office workflow and delivery of routine care. The main categories of barriers to incorporating the computer program into routine care included: • the program was viewed overall as inconsistent with practice workflow • the staff was inexperienced with the program • technical problems with the computer and/or printer • the program placed an additional time burden on staff who already felt overworked. Suggestions for improving the program or the way that it was incorporated into routine care included: • shortening the program • modifying the program’s orientation to a target population (such as patients with hypertension) and incorporating decision-support feedback to help physicians manage the target condition • modifying the program to include other programs pertinent to primary care (for example, depression screening) • selecting patients to use the program, rather than asking all patients to use it. Conclusions After working closely with ten highly motivated primary care offices, we were unable to fully implement a point-of-care health behaviour computer system for patients and providers. Suggestions for disseminating computer-tailored health behaviour communications in primary care settings are discussed.https://hijournal.bcs.org/index.php/jhi/article/view/107computer-tailoredhealth behaviourpoint-of-care
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Christopher Sciamanna
Bess Marcus
Michael Goldstein
Kipp Lawrence
Sue Swartz
Beth Bock
Amanda Graham
David Ahern
spellingShingle Christopher Sciamanna
Bess Marcus
Michael Goldstein
Kipp Lawrence
Sue Swartz
Beth Bock
Amanda Graham
David Ahern
Feasibility of incorporating computertailored health behaviour communications in primary care settings
Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics
computer-tailored
health behaviour
point-of-care
author_facet Christopher Sciamanna
Bess Marcus
Michael Goldstein
Kipp Lawrence
Sue Swartz
Beth Bock
Amanda Graham
David Ahern
author_sort Christopher Sciamanna
title Feasibility of incorporating computertailored health behaviour communications in primary care settings
title_short Feasibility of incorporating computertailored health behaviour communications in primary care settings
title_full Feasibility of incorporating computertailored health behaviour communications in primary care settings
title_fullStr Feasibility of incorporating computertailored health behaviour communications in primary care settings
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of incorporating computertailored health behaviour communications in primary care settings
title_sort feasibility of incorporating computertailored health behaviour communications in primary care settings
publisher BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT
series Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics
issn 2058-4555
2058-4563
publishDate 2004-02-01
description Background We set out to investigate the feasibility of incorporating a computer-tailored health behaviour program into routine care in a group of primary care practices in Rhode Island. Methods Two existing computer programs (physical activity, smoking) that tailored text and graphical feedback to survey responses were combined and adapted for use in primary care directly by patients. Ten primary care practices were recruited and worked closely with project staff to develop a practice-specific plan for incorporating the program into the workflow and office routine. Feasibility was measured by the percentage of patients who used the program during the day of their visit. Results Only one of the ten offices was able to successfully incorporate the program into their office workflow and delivery of routine care. The main categories of barriers to incorporating the computer program into routine care included: • the program was viewed overall as inconsistent with practice workflow • the staff was inexperienced with the program • technical problems with the computer and/or printer • the program placed an additional time burden on staff who already felt overworked. Suggestions for improving the program or the way that it was incorporated into routine care included: • shortening the program • modifying the program’s orientation to a target population (such as patients with hypertension) and incorporating decision-support feedback to help physicians manage the target condition • modifying the program to include other programs pertinent to primary care (for example, depression screening) • selecting patients to use the program, rather than asking all patients to use it. Conclusions After working closely with ten highly motivated primary care offices, we were unable to fully implement a point-of-care health behaviour computer system for patients and providers. Suggestions for disseminating computer-tailored health behaviour communications in primary care settings are discussed.
topic computer-tailored
health behaviour
point-of-care
url https://hijournal.bcs.org/index.php/jhi/article/view/107
work_keys_str_mv AT christophersciamanna feasibilityofincorporatingcomputertailoredhealthbehaviourcommunicationsinprimarycaresettings
AT bessmarcus feasibilityofincorporatingcomputertailoredhealthbehaviourcommunicationsinprimarycaresettings
AT michaelgoldstein feasibilityofincorporatingcomputertailoredhealthbehaviourcommunicationsinprimarycaresettings
AT kipplawrence feasibilityofincorporatingcomputertailoredhealthbehaviourcommunicationsinprimarycaresettings
AT sueswartz feasibilityofincorporatingcomputertailoredhealthbehaviourcommunicationsinprimarycaresettings
AT bethbock feasibilityofincorporatingcomputertailoredhealthbehaviourcommunicationsinprimarycaresettings
AT amandagraham feasibilityofincorporatingcomputertailoredhealthbehaviourcommunicationsinprimarycaresettings
AT davidahern feasibilityofincorporatingcomputertailoredhealthbehaviourcommunicationsinprimarycaresettings
_version_ 1716826438109233152