Considerations for designing chemical screening strategies in plant biology

Traditionally, biologists regularly used classical genetic approaches to characterize and dissect plant processes. However, this strategy is often impaired by redundancy, lethality or pleiotropy of gene functions, which prevent the isolation of viable mutants. The chemical genetic approach has been...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mario eSerrano, Erich eKombrink, Christian eMeesters
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Plant Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpls.2015.00131/full
id doaj-bc9db8e31d9144e88f844a42a4d34d0a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bc9db8e31d9144e88f844a42a4d34d0a2020-11-24T20:46:27ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Plant Science1664-462X2015-04-01610.3389/fpls.2015.00131132490Considerations for designing chemical screening strategies in plant biologyMario eSerrano0Mario eSerrano1Erich eKombrink2Christian eMeesters3Christian eMeesters4University of FribourgUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMax Planck Institute for Plant Breeding ResearchMax Planck Institute for Plant Breeding ResearchUniversity of Duisburg-EssenTraditionally, biologists regularly used classical genetic approaches to characterize and dissect plant processes. However, this strategy is often impaired by redundancy, lethality or pleiotropy of gene functions, which prevent the isolation of viable mutants. The chemical genetic approach has been recognized as an alternative experimental strategy, which has the potential to circumvent these problems. It relies on the capacity of small molecules to modify biological processes by specific binding to protein target(s), thereby conditionally modifying protein function(s), which phenotypically resemble mutation(s) of the encoding gene(s). A successful chemical screening campaign comprises three equally important elements: (1) a reliable, robust, and quantitative bioassay, which allows to distinguish between potent and less potent compounds, (2) a rigorous validation process for candidate compounds to establish their selectivity, and (3) an experimental strategy for elucidating a compound’s mode of action and molecular target. In this review we will discuss details of this general strategy and additional aspects that deserve consideration in order to take full advantage of the power provided by the chemical approach to plant biology. In addition, we will highlight some success stories of recent chemical screenings in plant systems, which may serve as teaching examples for the implementation of future chemical biology projects.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpls.2015.00131/fullArabidopsis thalianaChemical GeneticsHigh-Throughput ScreeningTarget identificationstructure–activity relationshipchemical libraries
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mario eSerrano
Mario eSerrano
Erich eKombrink
Christian eMeesters
Christian eMeesters
spellingShingle Mario eSerrano
Mario eSerrano
Erich eKombrink
Christian eMeesters
Christian eMeesters
Considerations for designing chemical screening strategies in plant biology
Frontiers in Plant Science
Arabidopsis thaliana
Chemical Genetics
High-Throughput Screening
Target identification
structure–activity relationship
chemical libraries
author_facet Mario eSerrano
Mario eSerrano
Erich eKombrink
Christian eMeesters
Christian eMeesters
author_sort Mario eSerrano
title Considerations for designing chemical screening strategies in plant biology
title_short Considerations for designing chemical screening strategies in plant biology
title_full Considerations for designing chemical screening strategies in plant biology
title_fullStr Considerations for designing chemical screening strategies in plant biology
title_full_unstemmed Considerations for designing chemical screening strategies in plant biology
title_sort considerations for designing chemical screening strategies in plant biology
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Plant Science
issn 1664-462X
publishDate 2015-04-01
description Traditionally, biologists regularly used classical genetic approaches to characterize and dissect plant processes. However, this strategy is often impaired by redundancy, lethality or pleiotropy of gene functions, which prevent the isolation of viable mutants. The chemical genetic approach has been recognized as an alternative experimental strategy, which has the potential to circumvent these problems. It relies on the capacity of small molecules to modify biological processes by specific binding to protein target(s), thereby conditionally modifying protein function(s), which phenotypically resemble mutation(s) of the encoding gene(s). A successful chemical screening campaign comprises three equally important elements: (1) a reliable, robust, and quantitative bioassay, which allows to distinguish between potent and less potent compounds, (2) a rigorous validation process for candidate compounds to establish their selectivity, and (3) an experimental strategy for elucidating a compound’s mode of action and molecular target. In this review we will discuss details of this general strategy and additional aspects that deserve consideration in order to take full advantage of the power provided by the chemical approach to plant biology. In addition, we will highlight some success stories of recent chemical screenings in plant systems, which may serve as teaching examples for the implementation of future chemical biology projects.
topic Arabidopsis thaliana
Chemical Genetics
High-Throughput Screening
Target identification
structure–activity relationship
chemical libraries
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpls.2015.00131/full
work_keys_str_mv AT marioeserrano considerationsfordesigningchemicalscreeningstrategiesinplantbiology
AT marioeserrano considerationsfordesigningchemicalscreeningstrategiesinplantbiology
AT erichekombrink considerationsfordesigningchemicalscreeningstrategiesinplantbiology
AT christianemeesters considerationsfordesigningchemicalscreeningstrategiesinplantbiology
AT christianemeesters considerationsfordesigningchemicalscreeningstrategiesinplantbiology
_version_ 1716812568417271808