A semiotic approach to language ideologies: Modelling the changing Icelandic languagescape
Attempts have been made to examine how speakers frame linguistic varieties by employing social semiotic models. Using ethnographic data collected over many years, this article applies such a model to Iceland, once described as the ‘e-coli of linguistics’ – its size, historical isolation and relativ...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Tartu Press
2020-12-01
|
Series: | Sign Systems Studies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/17087 |
id |
doaj-bc85e07116784d3a82380bf14060fb67 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-bc85e07116784d3a82380bf14060fb672021-04-02T19:18:44ZengUniversity of Tartu PressSign Systems Studies1406-42431736-74092020-12-01482-410.12697/SSS.2020.48.2-4.05A semiotic approach to language ideologies: Modelling the changing Icelandic languagescapeStephen Pax Leonard0Moscow State Linguistic University, Ulitsa Ostozhenka 38, c1, Moscow 119034; Institute of Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 3–1 Sadovaya Kudrinskaya St, Moscow 123432, Russia Attempts have been made to examine how speakers frame linguistic varieties by employing social semiotic models. Using ethnographic data collected over many years, this article applies such a model to Iceland, once described as the ‘e-coli of linguistics’ – its size, historical isolation and relative linguistic homogeneity create conditions akin to a sociolinguistic laboratory. This semiotic model of language ideologies problematizes the prevailing discourse of linguistic purism at a time of sociolinguistic upheaval. The analysis shows how an essentializing scheme at the heart of Icelandic language policy ensured that linguistic “anomalies” such as “dative disease” and “genitive phobia” indexed essential differences. “Impure” language was indicative of un-Icelandicness. Once monolingual (indeed monodialectal), the Icelandic speech community is increasingly characterized by innovative linguistic transgressions which thus far have not been instrumentalized by language policy makers. It is shown how a semiotic model can help us analyse the function of language ideologies more generally. https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/17087languageideologysemioticsIcelandicpurism |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Stephen Pax Leonard |
spellingShingle |
Stephen Pax Leonard A semiotic approach to language ideologies: Modelling the changing Icelandic languagescape Sign Systems Studies language ideology semiotics Icelandic purism |
author_facet |
Stephen Pax Leonard |
author_sort |
Stephen Pax Leonard |
title |
A semiotic approach to language ideologies: Modelling the changing Icelandic languagescape |
title_short |
A semiotic approach to language ideologies: Modelling the changing Icelandic languagescape |
title_full |
A semiotic approach to language ideologies: Modelling the changing Icelandic languagescape |
title_fullStr |
A semiotic approach to language ideologies: Modelling the changing Icelandic languagescape |
title_full_unstemmed |
A semiotic approach to language ideologies: Modelling the changing Icelandic languagescape |
title_sort |
semiotic approach to language ideologies: modelling the changing icelandic languagescape |
publisher |
University of Tartu Press |
series |
Sign Systems Studies |
issn |
1406-4243 1736-7409 |
publishDate |
2020-12-01 |
description |
Attempts have been made to examine how speakers frame linguistic varieties by employing social semiotic models. Using ethnographic data collected over many years, this article applies such a model to Iceland, once described as the ‘e-coli of linguistics’ – its size, historical isolation and relative linguistic homogeneity create conditions akin to a sociolinguistic laboratory. This semiotic model of language ideologies problematizes the prevailing discourse of linguistic purism at a time of sociolinguistic upheaval. The analysis shows how an essentializing scheme at the heart of Icelandic language policy ensured that linguistic “anomalies” such as “dative disease” and “genitive phobia” indexed essential differences. “Impure” language was indicative of un-Icelandicness. Once monolingual (indeed monodialectal), the Icelandic speech community is increasingly characterized by innovative linguistic transgressions which thus far have not been instrumentalized by language policy makers. It is shown how a semiotic model can help us analyse the function of language ideologies more generally.
|
topic |
language ideology semiotics Icelandic purism |
url |
https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/17087 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT stephenpaxleonard asemioticapproachtolanguageideologiesmodellingthechangingicelandiclanguagescape AT stephenpaxleonard semioticapproachtolanguageideologiesmodellingthechangingicelandiclanguagescape |
_version_ |
1721549313679556608 |