Efficacy of growth hormone supplementation with ultrashort GnRH antagonist in IVF/ICSI for poor responders; randomized controlled trial

Objectives: To compare the ICSI-ET outcomes in poor responders who underwent ovarian stimulation by the ultrashort GnRH antagonist protocol with or without adjuvant GH injection. Material and methods: This randomized controlled study was conducted at Al-Azhar University from December-2018 to June-20...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ehab H. Mohammad, Ahmed G. Abou El Serour, Eman A.H. Mohamed, Amr H. Abbasy, Mahmoud Zaatar, Kamal A. Rageh, Mohamed M. Shafeek, Emad R. Issak
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-01-01
Series:Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1028455920302527
id doaj-bc719c4e671e404a95960a69fb45b07d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bc719c4e671e404a95960a69fb45b07d2021-01-24T04:26:33ZengElsevierTaiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology1028-45592021-01-016015155Efficacy of growth hormone supplementation with ultrashort GnRH antagonist in IVF/ICSI for poor responders; randomized controlled trialEhab H. Mohammad0Ahmed G. Abou El Serour1Eman A.H. Mohamed2Amr H. Abbasy3Mahmoud Zaatar4Kamal A. Rageh5Mohamed M. Shafeek6Emad R. Issak7Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, EgyptDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, EgyptDepartment of Embryology, International Islamic Center for Population Studies &amp; Research, Al Azhar University, EgyptDepartment of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, National Research Center, EgyptDepartment of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, National Research Center, EgyptDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, EgyptDepartment of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, National Research Center, EgyptDepartment of Internal Medicine, Nova Clinics, Cairo, Egypt; Corresponding author. 47 Becho, Maadi, Cairo, Egypt.Objectives: To compare the ICSI-ET outcomes in poor responders who underwent ovarian stimulation by the ultrashort GnRH antagonist protocol with or without adjuvant GH injection. Material and methods: This randomized controlled study was conducted at Al-Azhar University from December-2018 to June-2019 upon 156 participants. All patients received the same preparations. After randomization, in the study group, women have received GH 4 IU/day subcutaneous injection from the second day of the cycle stopped one day before ovum pickup. While in the control group, women have received subcutaneous saline in the same dosing as in the study group. After intervention, all procedures were the same in both groups. The main outcome measure was the clinical pregnancy rate. Statistical analysis was based on the intention-to-treat population. Results: Both groups were comparable with regard their baseline characteristics (p-values > 0.05). Ovulation characteristics were comparable (p-values > 0.05). The level of E2 is significantly (p-value = 0.003) higher in the GH group. The oocyte retrieved number was significantly (p-value < 0.001) higher in the GH group 4.94 ± 1.77 than in the control group 3.74 ± 1.82. The mean number of MII oocytes was significantly (p-value < 0.001) higher in the GH group 3.3 ± 1.36 than in the control group 2.29 ± 1.24. Fertilization characteristics, implantation rate, pregnancy rate were comparable (p-values > 0.05). Conclusion: Despite the fact that this study showed no significant increase in the clinical and chemical pregnancy rates by the addition of GH to the ultrashort antagonist protocol in poor responders, the number of retrieved oocytes was significantly higher in the GH group. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03759301.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1028455920302527Embryo transferGrowth hormoneOvarian inductionOvarian insufficiencyPregnancy rate
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ehab H. Mohammad
Ahmed G. Abou El Serour
Eman A.H. Mohamed
Amr H. Abbasy
Mahmoud Zaatar
Kamal A. Rageh
Mohamed M. Shafeek
Emad R. Issak
spellingShingle Ehab H. Mohammad
Ahmed G. Abou El Serour
Eman A.H. Mohamed
Amr H. Abbasy
Mahmoud Zaatar
Kamal A. Rageh
Mohamed M. Shafeek
Emad R. Issak
Efficacy of growth hormone supplementation with ultrashort GnRH antagonist in IVF/ICSI for poor responders; randomized controlled trial
Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Embryo transfer
Growth hormone
Ovarian induction
Ovarian insufficiency
Pregnancy rate
author_facet Ehab H. Mohammad
Ahmed G. Abou El Serour
Eman A.H. Mohamed
Amr H. Abbasy
Mahmoud Zaatar
Kamal A. Rageh
Mohamed M. Shafeek
Emad R. Issak
author_sort Ehab H. Mohammad
title Efficacy of growth hormone supplementation with ultrashort GnRH antagonist in IVF/ICSI for poor responders; randomized controlled trial
title_short Efficacy of growth hormone supplementation with ultrashort GnRH antagonist in IVF/ICSI for poor responders; randomized controlled trial
title_full Efficacy of growth hormone supplementation with ultrashort GnRH antagonist in IVF/ICSI for poor responders; randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Efficacy of growth hormone supplementation with ultrashort GnRH antagonist in IVF/ICSI for poor responders; randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of growth hormone supplementation with ultrashort GnRH antagonist in IVF/ICSI for poor responders; randomized controlled trial
title_sort efficacy of growth hormone supplementation with ultrashort gnrh antagonist in ivf/icsi for poor responders; randomized controlled trial
publisher Elsevier
series Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
issn 1028-4559
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Objectives: To compare the ICSI-ET outcomes in poor responders who underwent ovarian stimulation by the ultrashort GnRH antagonist protocol with or without adjuvant GH injection. Material and methods: This randomized controlled study was conducted at Al-Azhar University from December-2018 to June-2019 upon 156 participants. All patients received the same preparations. After randomization, in the study group, women have received GH 4 IU/day subcutaneous injection from the second day of the cycle stopped one day before ovum pickup. While in the control group, women have received subcutaneous saline in the same dosing as in the study group. After intervention, all procedures were the same in both groups. The main outcome measure was the clinical pregnancy rate. Statistical analysis was based on the intention-to-treat population. Results: Both groups were comparable with regard their baseline characteristics (p-values > 0.05). Ovulation characteristics were comparable (p-values > 0.05). The level of E2 is significantly (p-value = 0.003) higher in the GH group. The oocyte retrieved number was significantly (p-value < 0.001) higher in the GH group 4.94 ± 1.77 than in the control group 3.74 ± 1.82. The mean number of MII oocytes was significantly (p-value < 0.001) higher in the GH group 3.3 ± 1.36 than in the control group 2.29 ± 1.24. Fertilization characteristics, implantation rate, pregnancy rate were comparable (p-values > 0.05). Conclusion: Despite the fact that this study showed no significant increase in the clinical and chemical pregnancy rates by the addition of GH to the ultrashort antagonist protocol in poor responders, the number of retrieved oocytes was significantly higher in the GH group. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03759301.
topic Embryo transfer
Growth hormone
Ovarian induction
Ovarian insufficiency
Pregnancy rate
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1028455920302527
work_keys_str_mv AT ehabhmohammad efficacyofgrowthhormonesupplementationwithultrashortgnrhantagonistinivficsiforpoorrespondersrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ahmedgabouelserour efficacyofgrowthhormonesupplementationwithultrashortgnrhantagonistinivficsiforpoorrespondersrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT emanahmohamed efficacyofgrowthhormonesupplementationwithultrashortgnrhantagonistinivficsiforpoorrespondersrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT amrhabbasy efficacyofgrowthhormonesupplementationwithultrashortgnrhantagonistinivficsiforpoorrespondersrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mahmoudzaatar efficacyofgrowthhormonesupplementationwithultrashortgnrhantagonistinivficsiforpoorrespondersrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kamalarageh efficacyofgrowthhormonesupplementationwithultrashortgnrhantagonistinivficsiforpoorrespondersrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mohamedmshafeek efficacyofgrowthhormonesupplementationwithultrashortgnrhantagonistinivficsiforpoorrespondersrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT emadrissak efficacyofgrowthhormonesupplementationwithultrashortgnrhantagonistinivficsiforpoorrespondersrandomizedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1724326822065209344