IoT Community Technologies: Leaving Users to Their Own Devices or Orchestration of Engagement?

Citizens are increasingly crowdfunding IoT based participatory sensing technologies that allow them to collect and sharedata about the environment. These initiatives are usually referred to as grassroots and are driven by a vision of wideningaccess to tools for political action. In this paper we com...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. Balestrini, T. Diez, P. Marshall, A. Gluhak, Y. Rogers
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: European Alliance for Innovation (EAI) 2015-10-01
Series:EAI Endorsed Transactions on Internet of Things
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eudl.eu/pdf/10.4108/eai.26-10-2015.150601
id doaj-bc6c49e06db14bf7be3741275c8ee23f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bc6c49e06db14bf7be3741275c8ee23f2020-11-25T02:43:26ZengEuropean Alliance for Innovation (EAI)EAI Endorsed Transactions on Internet of Things2414-13992015-10-011110.4108/eai.26-10-2015.150601IoT Community Technologies: Leaving Users to Their Own Devices or Orchestration of Engagement?M. Balestrini0T. Diez1P. Marshall2A. Gluhak3Y. Rogers4Intel ICRI Cities, University College London, UKIntel ICRI Cities, University College London, UKUCLIC, University College London, UKIntel Labs Europe, London, UKUCLIC, University College London, UKCitizens are increasingly crowdfunding IoT based participatory sensing technologies that allow them to collect and sharedata about the environment. These initiatives are usually referred to as grassroots and are driven by a vision of wideningaccess to tools for political action. In this paper we compare patterns of participation and user experience over 15 monthsin two distinct communities using ‘Smart Citizen’, a crowdfunded IoT participatory sensing tool. Our studies reveal thattechnology issues and a lack of reliability of the sensed data hindered user participation. However, in one of thecommunities, many of these challenges were overcome through orchestrated actions led by community champions. Wediscuss how crowdfunding doesn’t necessarily translate into active participation and provide guidelines on how to achievesustained engagement in crowdfunded IoT community sensing projects: enable distributed orchestration provided by localchampions, encourage social interactions that embed skills and learning, and facilitate meaningful participation and rewardmechanisms among community members.https://eudl.eu/pdf/10.4108/eai.26-10-2015.150601IoT community technologiesengagementcrowdfundingsocial actionactivismparticipatory sensing
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author M. Balestrini
T. Diez
P. Marshall
A. Gluhak
Y. Rogers
spellingShingle M. Balestrini
T. Diez
P. Marshall
A. Gluhak
Y. Rogers
IoT Community Technologies: Leaving Users to Their Own Devices or Orchestration of Engagement?
EAI Endorsed Transactions on Internet of Things
IoT community technologies
engagement
crowdfunding
social action
activism
participatory sensing
author_facet M. Balestrini
T. Diez
P. Marshall
A. Gluhak
Y. Rogers
author_sort M. Balestrini
title IoT Community Technologies: Leaving Users to Their Own Devices or Orchestration of Engagement?
title_short IoT Community Technologies: Leaving Users to Their Own Devices or Orchestration of Engagement?
title_full IoT Community Technologies: Leaving Users to Their Own Devices or Orchestration of Engagement?
title_fullStr IoT Community Technologies: Leaving Users to Their Own Devices or Orchestration of Engagement?
title_full_unstemmed IoT Community Technologies: Leaving Users to Their Own Devices or Orchestration of Engagement?
title_sort iot community technologies: leaving users to their own devices or orchestration of engagement?
publisher European Alliance for Innovation (EAI)
series EAI Endorsed Transactions on Internet of Things
issn 2414-1399
publishDate 2015-10-01
description Citizens are increasingly crowdfunding IoT based participatory sensing technologies that allow them to collect and sharedata about the environment. These initiatives are usually referred to as grassroots and are driven by a vision of wideningaccess to tools for political action. In this paper we compare patterns of participation and user experience over 15 monthsin two distinct communities using ‘Smart Citizen’, a crowdfunded IoT participatory sensing tool. Our studies reveal thattechnology issues and a lack of reliability of the sensed data hindered user participation. However, in one of thecommunities, many of these challenges were overcome through orchestrated actions led by community champions. Wediscuss how crowdfunding doesn’t necessarily translate into active participation and provide guidelines on how to achievesustained engagement in crowdfunded IoT community sensing projects: enable distributed orchestration provided by localchampions, encourage social interactions that embed skills and learning, and facilitate meaningful participation and rewardmechanisms among community members.
topic IoT community technologies
engagement
crowdfunding
social action
activism
participatory sensing
url https://eudl.eu/pdf/10.4108/eai.26-10-2015.150601
work_keys_str_mv AT mbalestrini iotcommunitytechnologiesleavinguserstotheirowndevicesororchestrationofengagement
AT tdiez iotcommunitytechnologiesleavinguserstotheirowndevicesororchestrationofengagement
AT pmarshall iotcommunitytechnologiesleavinguserstotheirowndevicesororchestrationofengagement
AT agluhak iotcommunitytechnologiesleavinguserstotheirowndevicesororchestrationofengagement
AT yrogers iotcommunitytechnologiesleavinguserstotheirowndevicesororchestrationofengagement
_version_ 1724769355718197248