A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses Comparing Periodized and Non-periodized Exercise Programs: Why We Should Go Back to Original Research
Periodization schedules training periods according to predicted timings of cumulative adaptations and has been at the foundation of exercise prescription. Recently, a selected body of work has highlighted that original research may be providing support for variation, but not for periodized variation...
Main Authors: | José Afonso, Tiago Rocha, Pantelis T. Nikolaidis, Filipe Manuel Clemente, Thomas Rosemann, Beat Knechtle |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019-08-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Physiology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphys.2019.01023/full |
Similar Items
-
A systematic review of research on Tactical Periodization: absence of empirical data, burden of proof, and benefit of doubt
by: José Afonso, et al.
Published: (2020-06-01) -
Is Empirical Research on Periodization Trustworthy? A Comprehensive Review of Conceptual and Methodological Issues
by: José Afonso, Pantelis T. Nikolaidis, Patrícia Sousa, Isabel Mesquita
Published: (2017-03-01) -
Development and Validation of Prediction Equation of “Athens Authentic Marathon” Men’s Race Speed
by: Pantelis T. Nikolaidis, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01) -
Age-Predicted Maximal Heart Rate in Recreational Marathon Runners: A Cross-Sectional Study on Fox's and Tanaka's Equations
by: Pantelis T. Nikolaidis, et al.
Published: (2018-03-01) -
Should It Stay or Should It Go? A Critical Reflection on the Critical Period for Language
by: Sergio Balari, et al.
Published: (2015-07-01)