A study on the equality and benefit of China’s national health care system

Abstract Background This study is designed to evaluate whether the benefit which the residents received from the national health care system is equal in China. The perceived equality and benefit are used to measure the personal status of health care system, health status. This study examines variati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shaoguo Zhai, Pei Wang, Quanfang Dong, Xing Ren, Jiaoli Cai, Peter C. Coyte
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-08-01
Series:International Journal for Equity in Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12939-017-0653-4
id doaj-bc5734b74fe94cfb894234e7b032e86e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bc5734b74fe94cfb894234e7b032e86e2020-11-25T00:01:28ZengBMCInternational Journal for Equity in Health1475-92762017-08-0116111110.1186/s12939-017-0653-4A study on the equality and benefit of China’s national health care systemShaoguo Zhai0Pei Wang1Quanfang Dong2Xing Ren3Jiaoli Cai4Peter C. Coyte5School of Public Administration, Northwest UniversitySchool of Politics and Administration, Xianyang Normal UniversitySchool of Public Policy and Administration, Xi’an Jiaotong UniversitySchool of Public Administration, Northwest UniversitySchool of Economics, Wuhan University of TechnologyInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of TorontoAbstract Background This study is designed to evaluate whether the benefit which the residents received from the national health care system is equal in China. The perceived equality and benefit are used to measure the personal status of health care system, health status. This study examines variations in perceived equality and benefit of the national health care system between urban and rural residents from five cities of China and assessed their determinants. Methods One thousand one hundred ninty eight residents were selected from a random survey among five nationally representative cities. The research characterizes perceptions into four population groupings based on a binary assessment of survey scores: high equality & high benefit; low equality & low benefit; high equality & low benefit; and low equality & high benefit. Results The distribution of the four groups above is 30.4%, 43.0%, 4.6% and 22.0%, respectively. Meanwhile, the type of health insurance, educational background, occupation, geographic regions, changes in health status and other factors have significant impacts on perceived equality and benefit derived from the health care system. Conclusion The findings demonstrate wide variations in perceptions of equality and benefit between urban and rural residents and across population characteristics, leading to a perceived lack of fairness in benefits and accessibility. Opportunities exist for policy interventions that are targeted to eliminate perceived differences and promote greater equality in access to health care.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12939-017-0653-4Health careEqualityBenefit
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shaoguo Zhai
Pei Wang
Quanfang Dong
Xing Ren
Jiaoli Cai
Peter C. Coyte
spellingShingle Shaoguo Zhai
Pei Wang
Quanfang Dong
Xing Ren
Jiaoli Cai
Peter C. Coyte
A study on the equality and benefit of China’s national health care system
International Journal for Equity in Health
Health care
Equality
Benefit
author_facet Shaoguo Zhai
Pei Wang
Quanfang Dong
Xing Ren
Jiaoli Cai
Peter C. Coyte
author_sort Shaoguo Zhai
title A study on the equality and benefit of China’s national health care system
title_short A study on the equality and benefit of China’s national health care system
title_full A study on the equality and benefit of China’s national health care system
title_fullStr A study on the equality and benefit of China’s national health care system
title_full_unstemmed A study on the equality and benefit of China’s national health care system
title_sort study on the equality and benefit of china’s national health care system
publisher BMC
series International Journal for Equity in Health
issn 1475-9276
publishDate 2017-08-01
description Abstract Background This study is designed to evaluate whether the benefit which the residents received from the national health care system is equal in China. The perceived equality and benefit are used to measure the personal status of health care system, health status. This study examines variations in perceived equality and benefit of the national health care system between urban and rural residents from five cities of China and assessed their determinants. Methods One thousand one hundred ninty eight residents were selected from a random survey among five nationally representative cities. The research characterizes perceptions into four population groupings based on a binary assessment of survey scores: high equality & high benefit; low equality & low benefit; high equality & low benefit; and low equality & high benefit. Results The distribution of the four groups above is 30.4%, 43.0%, 4.6% and 22.0%, respectively. Meanwhile, the type of health insurance, educational background, occupation, geographic regions, changes in health status and other factors have significant impacts on perceived equality and benefit derived from the health care system. Conclusion The findings demonstrate wide variations in perceptions of equality and benefit between urban and rural residents and across population characteristics, leading to a perceived lack of fairness in benefits and accessibility. Opportunities exist for policy interventions that are targeted to eliminate perceived differences and promote greater equality in access to health care.
topic Health care
Equality
Benefit
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12939-017-0653-4
work_keys_str_mv AT shaoguozhai astudyontheequalityandbenefitofchinasnationalhealthcaresystem
AT peiwang astudyontheequalityandbenefitofchinasnationalhealthcaresystem
AT quanfangdong astudyontheequalityandbenefitofchinasnationalhealthcaresystem
AT xingren astudyontheequalityandbenefitofchinasnationalhealthcaresystem
AT jiaolicai astudyontheequalityandbenefitofchinasnationalhealthcaresystem
AT peterccoyte astudyontheequalityandbenefitofchinasnationalhealthcaresystem
AT shaoguozhai studyontheequalityandbenefitofchinasnationalhealthcaresystem
AT peiwang studyontheequalityandbenefitofchinasnationalhealthcaresystem
AT quanfangdong studyontheequalityandbenefitofchinasnationalhealthcaresystem
AT xingren studyontheequalityandbenefitofchinasnationalhealthcaresystem
AT jiaolicai studyontheequalityandbenefitofchinasnationalhealthcaresystem
AT peterccoyte studyontheequalityandbenefitofchinasnationalhealthcaresystem
_version_ 1725441857885831168