A study on the equality and benefit of China’s national health care system
Abstract Background This study is designed to evaluate whether the benefit which the residents received from the national health care system is equal in China. The perceived equality and benefit are used to measure the personal status of health care system, health status. This study examines variati...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2017-08-01
|
Series: | International Journal for Equity in Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12939-017-0653-4 |
id |
doaj-bc5734b74fe94cfb894234e7b032e86e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-bc5734b74fe94cfb894234e7b032e86e2020-11-25T00:01:28ZengBMCInternational Journal for Equity in Health1475-92762017-08-0116111110.1186/s12939-017-0653-4A study on the equality and benefit of China’s national health care systemShaoguo Zhai0Pei Wang1Quanfang Dong2Xing Ren3Jiaoli Cai4Peter C. Coyte5School of Public Administration, Northwest UniversitySchool of Politics and Administration, Xianyang Normal UniversitySchool of Public Policy and Administration, Xi’an Jiaotong UniversitySchool of Public Administration, Northwest UniversitySchool of Economics, Wuhan University of TechnologyInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of TorontoAbstract Background This study is designed to evaluate whether the benefit which the residents received from the national health care system is equal in China. The perceived equality and benefit are used to measure the personal status of health care system, health status. This study examines variations in perceived equality and benefit of the national health care system between urban and rural residents from five cities of China and assessed their determinants. Methods One thousand one hundred ninty eight residents were selected from a random survey among five nationally representative cities. The research characterizes perceptions into four population groupings based on a binary assessment of survey scores: high equality & high benefit; low equality & low benefit; high equality & low benefit; and low equality & high benefit. Results The distribution of the four groups above is 30.4%, 43.0%, 4.6% and 22.0%, respectively. Meanwhile, the type of health insurance, educational background, occupation, geographic regions, changes in health status and other factors have significant impacts on perceived equality and benefit derived from the health care system. Conclusion The findings demonstrate wide variations in perceptions of equality and benefit between urban and rural residents and across population characteristics, leading to a perceived lack of fairness in benefits and accessibility. Opportunities exist for policy interventions that are targeted to eliminate perceived differences and promote greater equality in access to health care.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12939-017-0653-4Health careEqualityBenefit |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Shaoguo Zhai Pei Wang Quanfang Dong Xing Ren Jiaoli Cai Peter C. Coyte |
spellingShingle |
Shaoguo Zhai Pei Wang Quanfang Dong Xing Ren Jiaoli Cai Peter C. Coyte A study on the equality and benefit of China’s national health care system International Journal for Equity in Health Health care Equality Benefit |
author_facet |
Shaoguo Zhai Pei Wang Quanfang Dong Xing Ren Jiaoli Cai Peter C. Coyte |
author_sort |
Shaoguo Zhai |
title |
A study on the equality and benefit of China’s national health care system |
title_short |
A study on the equality and benefit of China’s national health care system |
title_full |
A study on the equality and benefit of China’s national health care system |
title_fullStr |
A study on the equality and benefit of China’s national health care system |
title_full_unstemmed |
A study on the equality and benefit of China’s national health care system |
title_sort |
study on the equality and benefit of china’s national health care system |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
International Journal for Equity in Health |
issn |
1475-9276 |
publishDate |
2017-08-01 |
description |
Abstract Background This study is designed to evaluate whether the benefit which the residents received from the national health care system is equal in China. The perceived equality and benefit are used to measure the personal status of health care system, health status. This study examines variations in perceived equality and benefit of the national health care system between urban and rural residents from five cities of China and assessed their determinants. Methods One thousand one hundred ninty eight residents were selected from a random survey among five nationally representative cities. The research characterizes perceptions into four population groupings based on a binary assessment of survey scores: high equality & high benefit; low equality & low benefit; high equality & low benefit; and low equality & high benefit. Results The distribution of the four groups above is 30.4%, 43.0%, 4.6% and 22.0%, respectively. Meanwhile, the type of health insurance, educational background, occupation, geographic regions, changes in health status and other factors have significant impacts on perceived equality and benefit derived from the health care system. Conclusion The findings demonstrate wide variations in perceptions of equality and benefit between urban and rural residents and across population characteristics, leading to a perceived lack of fairness in benefits and accessibility. Opportunities exist for policy interventions that are targeted to eliminate perceived differences and promote greater equality in access to health care. |
topic |
Health care Equality Benefit |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12939-017-0653-4 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT shaoguozhai astudyontheequalityandbenefitofchinasnationalhealthcaresystem AT peiwang astudyontheequalityandbenefitofchinasnationalhealthcaresystem AT quanfangdong astudyontheequalityandbenefitofchinasnationalhealthcaresystem AT xingren astudyontheequalityandbenefitofchinasnationalhealthcaresystem AT jiaolicai astudyontheequalityandbenefitofchinasnationalhealthcaresystem AT peterccoyte astudyontheequalityandbenefitofchinasnationalhealthcaresystem AT shaoguozhai studyontheequalityandbenefitofchinasnationalhealthcaresystem AT peiwang studyontheequalityandbenefitofchinasnationalhealthcaresystem AT quanfangdong studyontheequalityandbenefitofchinasnationalhealthcaresystem AT xingren studyontheequalityandbenefitofchinasnationalhealthcaresystem AT jiaolicai studyontheequalityandbenefitofchinasnationalhealthcaresystem AT peterccoyte studyontheequalityandbenefitofchinasnationalhealthcaresystem |
_version_ |
1725441857885831168 |