How should we evaluate the patients with elevated 1 h-plasma glucose?

Objectives: This study evaluated the cutoff values of 1 h-plasma glucose (1 h-PG) for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and demonstrated how to evaluate the patients with elevated 1 h-PG. Subjects and Methods: All patients (n = 1433) without known impaired gluc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ri-Hyang Paek, Hak-Chol Ri, Chol-Min Pae
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2018-01-01
Series:Muller Journal of Medical Sciences and Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mjmsr.net/article.asp?issn=0975-9727;year=2018;volume=9;issue=2;spage=58;epage=62;aulast=Paek
id doaj-bc4b641da0e14431a656d89292fec4bf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bc4b641da0e14431a656d89292fec4bf2020-11-25T00:28:09ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsMuller Journal of Medical Sciences and Research0975-97272018-01-0192586210.4103/mjmsr.mjmsr_25_18How should we evaluate the patients with elevated 1 h-plasma glucose?Ri-Hyang PaekHak-Chol RiChol-Min PaeObjectives: This study evaluated the cutoff values of 1 h-plasma glucose (1 h-PG) for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and demonstrated how to evaluate the patients with elevated 1 h-PG. Subjects and Methods: All patients (n = 1433) without known impaired glucose homeostasis (diabetes mellitus [DM] or prediabetes) that have been submitted to the Hospital of the Pyongyang Medical College Kim Il Sung University were enrolled in this study for evaluation of their glucose homeostasis. Results: The area under the receiver operating characteristic of 1 h-PG during 75 g oral glucose tolerance test for diagnosis of DM and IGT were 0.944 ± 0.020 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.906–0.983) and 0.964 ± 0.009 (95% CI: 0.944–0.984), respectively. The most optimal cutoff value of 1 h-PG for DM and IGT were 231.0 mg/dL and 161 mg/dL, respectively About 10.4% of normal glucose tolerance (NGT) subjects diagnosed by the present American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria had 1 h-PG equal to 161 mg/dL or above, their insulin secretion level of pancreas was as low as IGT patient, insulin resistance was higher than NGT subjects with 1 h-PG <161 mg/dL. Moreover, 29.6% of “IGT” patients diagnosed by the present ADA criteria had 1 h-PG equal to 231 mg/dL or above, their insulin secretion level of pancreas was as low as DM patients, insulin resistance was lower than DM and similar to IGT patients with 1 h-PG <231 mg/dL. Conclusions: The cutoff value of 1 h-PG for DM and IGT is 231 mg/dL and 161 mg/dL, it has high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of DM and IGT. The patients with elevated 1 h-PG should be considered as impaired glucose homeostasis (IGT or DM), and therefore treated in time.http://www.mjmsr.net/article.asp?issn=0975-9727;year=2018;volume=9;issue=2;spage=58;epage=62;aulast=Paek1 h-plasma glucose75 g oral glucose tolerance testcutoff valuediabetes mellitusimpaired glucose toleranceinsulin resistance
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ri-Hyang Paek
Hak-Chol Ri
Chol-Min Pae
spellingShingle Ri-Hyang Paek
Hak-Chol Ri
Chol-Min Pae
How should we evaluate the patients with elevated 1 h-plasma glucose?
Muller Journal of Medical Sciences and Research
1 h-plasma glucose
75 g oral glucose tolerance test
cutoff value
diabetes mellitus
impaired glucose tolerance
insulin resistance
author_facet Ri-Hyang Paek
Hak-Chol Ri
Chol-Min Pae
author_sort Ri-Hyang Paek
title How should we evaluate the patients with elevated 1 h-plasma glucose?
title_short How should we evaluate the patients with elevated 1 h-plasma glucose?
title_full How should we evaluate the patients with elevated 1 h-plasma glucose?
title_fullStr How should we evaluate the patients with elevated 1 h-plasma glucose?
title_full_unstemmed How should we evaluate the patients with elevated 1 h-plasma glucose?
title_sort how should we evaluate the patients with elevated 1 h-plasma glucose?
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Muller Journal of Medical Sciences and Research
issn 0975-9727
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Objectives: This study evaluated the cutoff values of 1 h-plasma glucose (1 h-PG) for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and demonstrated how to evaluate the patients with elevated 1 h-PG. Subjects and Methods: All patients (n = 1433) without known impaired glucose homeostasis (diabetes mellitus [DM] or prediabetes) that have been submitted to the Hospital of the Pyongyang Medical College Kim Il Sung University were enrolled in this study for evaluation of their glucose homeostasis. Results: The area under the receiver operating characteristic of 1 h-PG during 75 g oral glucose tolerance test for diagnosis of DM and IGT were 0.944 ± 0.020 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.906–0.983) and 0.964 ± 0.009 (95% CI: 0.944–0.984), respectively. The most optimal cutoff value of 1 h-PG for DM and IGT were 231.0 mg/dL and 161 mg/dL, respectively About 10.4% of normal glucose tolerance (NGT) subjects diagnosed by the present American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria had 1 h-PG equal to 161 mg/dL or above, their insulin secretion level of pancreas was as low as IGT patient, insulin resistance was higher than NGT subjects with 1 h-PG <161 mg/dL. Moreover, 29.6% of “IGT” patients diagnosed by the present ADA criteria had 1 h-PG equal to 231 mg/dL or above, their insulin secretion level of pancreas was as low as DM patients, insulin resistance was lower than DM and similar to IGT patients with 1 h-PG <231 mg/dL. Conclusions: The cutoff value of 1 h-PG for DM and IGT is 231 mg/dL and 161 mg/dL, it has high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of DM and IGT. The patients with elevated 1 h-PG should be considered as impaired glucose homeostasis (IGT or DM), and therefore treated in time.
topic 1 h-plasma glucose
75 g oral glucose tolerance test
cutoff value
diabetes mellitus
impaired glucose tolerance
insulin resistance
url http://www.mjmsr.net/article.asp?issn=0975-9727;year=2018;volume=9;issue=2;spage=58;epage=62;aulast=Paek
work_keys_str_mv AT rihyangpaek howshouldweevaluatethepatientswithelevated1hplasmaglucose
AT hakcholri howshouldweevaluatethepatientswithelevated1hplasmaglucose
AT cholminpae howshouldweevaluatethepatientswithelevated1hplasmaglucose
_version_ 1725336617862823936