The Sequence of Mouse Dihydropteridine Reductase cDNA, and Comparison with Human and Rat Sequences

A mouse liver eDNA library in λZAP was screened using a 627 bp portion of 32p randomly labeled human dihydropteridine reductase (731 bp) cDNA and seven positive clones were obtained. Six of these clones were sequenced using T3 and T7 primers as well as five selected 18-mer oligonucleotides in a &quo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yang Nan, Hanssen Kevin, Armarego Wilfred L.F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 1996-02-01
Series:Pteridines
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/pteridines.1996.7.12.14
id doaj-bc4681e5348b466ca1a36bf289942297
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bc4681e5348b466ca1a36bf2899422972021-09-05T14:00:00ZengDe GruyterPteridines0933-48072195-47201996-02-0171-2142310.1515/pteridines.1996.7.12.14The Sequence of Mouse Dihydropteridine Reductase cDNA, and Comparison with Human and Rat SequencesYang Nan0Hanssen Kevin1Armarego Wilfred L.F.2Pteridine Biochemistry Laboratory, Division of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, John Curtin School of Medical Research, THe Australian National University, Acton 0200, ACT, AustraliaPteridine Biochemistry Laboratory, Division of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, John Curtin School of Medical Research, THe Australian National University, Acton 0200, ACT, AustraliaPteridine Biochemistry Laboratory, Division of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, John Curtin School of Medical Research, THe Australian National University, Acton 0200, ACT, AustraliaA mouse liver eDNA library in λZAP was screened using a 627 bp portion of 32p randomly labeled human dihydropteridine reductase (731 bp) cDNA and seven positive clones were obtained. Six of these clones were sequenced using T3 and T7 primers as well as five selected 18-mer oligonucleotides in a "primer walking" strategy. From the data a consensus sequence was obtained for the coding region, the 5 ' flanking region and the 3' flanking region up to the poly-A tail. Of the 720 nucleotides in the coding region of mouse dihydropteridine reductase only 89 were different from those in the human reductase and only 31 nucleotides were different from those in the rat reductase. The amino acid sequence of the mouse reductase on the other hand differed from that of the human reductase by 15 residues in addition to the three extra alanine residues at positions 4, 5 and 6 from the N terminus; and from the rat reductase by 6 residues, many of which were conservative changes. The rat enzyme differed from the human enzyme in 9 residues in addition to the three alanines. The similarity of the eDNA coding regions and the reductases produced were characteristic of, and essential for, a “house-keeping” enzyme. The DNA in the 5′ and 3′ flanking regions of the three cDNAs, on the other hand, were very dissimilar although the human DNA had diverged a lot more from the mouse DNA than the rat DNA. Initiation, termination and poly-A tail consensus sequence signals were identified in all three cDNAs. A vector was engineered that expressed mouse dihydropteridine reductase which had kinetic parameters (Km for q-6MeDHP 17.4µM, NADH 7.3µM and k 170 sec1 and Km for natural q-6R-BH2 8 .7µM, NADH 7.7µM and k 44.3 sec1 ) similar to those for the natural mouse reductase (Km for q-6MeDHP 16.5 µM, NADH 16.0 µM and k 214 sec1; and Km for natural q-6R-BH2 4.7 µM, NADH 9 .1µM and k 81.9 sec1 ) which was purified from mouse liver.https://doi.org/10.1515/pteridines.1996.7.12.14dihydropteridine reductasecomparison of humanrat and mouse cdna5' and 3' flanking and coding dna sequencesmouse dhpr expressed in e. coli and mouse liver dhprkinetic parameters
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yang Nan
Hanssen Kevin
Armarego Wilfred L.F.
spellingShingle Yang Nan
Hanssen Kevin
Armarego Wilfred L.F.
The Sequence of Mouse Dihydropteridine Reductase cDNA, and Comparison with Human and Rat Sequences
Pteridines
dihydropteridine reductase
comparison of human
rat and mouse cdna
5' and 3' flanking and coding dna sequences
mouse dhpr expressed in e. coli and mouse liver dhpr
kinetic parameters
author_facet Yang Nan
Hanssen Kevin
Armarego Wilfred L.F.
author_sort Yang Nan
title The Sequence of Mouse Dihydropteridine Reductase cDNA, and Comparison with Human and Rat Sequences
title_short The Sequence of Mouse Dihydropteridine Reductase cDNA, and Comparison with Human and Rat Sequences
title_full The Sequence of Mouse Dihydropteridine Reductase cDNA, and Comparison with Human and Rat Sequences
title_fullStr The Sequence of Mouse Dihydropteridine Reductase cDNA, and Comparison with Human and Rat Sequences
title_full_unstemmed The Sequence of Mouse Dihydropteridine Reductase cDNA, and Comparison with Human and Rat Sequences
title_sort sequence of mouse dihydropteridine reductase cdna, and comparison with human and rat sequences
publisher De Gruyter
series Pteridines
issn 0933-4807
2195-4720
publishDate 1996-02-01
description A mouse liver eDNA library in λZAP was screened using a 627 bp portion of 32p randomly labeled human dihydropteridine reductase (731 bp) cDNA and seven positive clones were obtained. Six of these clones were sequenced using T3 and T7 primers as well as five selected 18-mer oligonucleotides in a "primer walking" strategy. From the data a consensus sequence was obtained for the coding region, the 5 ' flanking region and the 3' flanking region up to the poly-A tail. Of the 720 nucleotides in the coding region of mouse dihydropteridine reductase only 89 were different from those in the human reductase and only 31 nucleotides were different from those in the rat reductase. The amino acid sequence of the mouse reductase on the other hand differed from that of the human reductase by 15 residues in addition to the three extra alanine residues at positions 4, 5 and 6 from the N terminus; and from the rat reductase by 6 residues, many of which were conservative changes. The rat enzyme differed from the human enzyme in 9 residues in addition to the three alanines. The similarity of the eDNA coding regions and the reductases produced were characteristic of, and essential for, a “house-keeping” enzyme. The DNA in the 5′ and 3′ flanking regions of the three cDNAs, on the other hand, were very dissimilar although the human DNA had diverged a lot more from the mouse DNA than the rat DNA. Initiation, termination and poly-A tail consensus sequence signals were identified in all three cDNAs. A vector was engineered that expressed mouse dihydropteridine reductase which had kinetic parameters (Km for q-6MeDHP 17.4µM, NADH 7.3µM and k 170 sec1 and Km for natural q-6R-BH2 8 .7µM, NADH 7.7µM and k 44.3 sec1 ) similar to those for the natural mouse reductase (Km for q-6MeDHP 16.5 µM, NADH 16.0 µM and k 214 sec1; and Km for natural q-6R-BH2 4.7 µM, NADH 9 .1µM and k 81.9 sec1 ) which was purified from mouse liver.
topic dihydropteridine reductase
comparison of human
rat and mouse cdna
5' and 3' flanking and coding dna sequences
mouse dhpr expressed in e. coli and mouse liver dhpr
kinetic parameters
url https://doi.org/10.1515/pteridines.1996.7.12.14
work_keys_str_mv AT yangnan thesequenceofmousedihydropteridinereductasecdnaandcomparisonwithhumanandratsequences
AT hanssenkevin thesequenceofmousedihydropteridinereductasecdnaandcomparisonwithhumanandratsequences
AT armaregowilfredlf thesequenceofmousedihydropteridinereductasecdnaandcomparisonwithhumanandratsequences
AT yangnan sequenceofmousedihydropteridinereductasecdnaandcomparisonwithhumanandratsequences
AT hanssenkevin sequenceofmousedihydropteridinereductasecdnaandcomparisonwithhumanandratsequences
AT armaregowilfredlf sequenceofmousedihydropteridinereductasecdnaandcomparisonwithhumanandratsequences
_version_ 1717812624523001856