Intrafractional motion in stereotactic body radiotherapy of spinal metastases utilizing cone beam computed tomography image guidance
Background and purpose: Spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) requires a high degree of accuracy due to steep dose gradients close to the spinal cord. This study aimed to (1) evaluate intrafractional motion in spine SBRT utilizing flattening filter free (FFF) beam delivery and cone beam comput...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2019-10-01
|
Series: | Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240563161930048X |
id |
doaj-bc4299faaa3040e6a3481d0c4d73c468 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-bc4299faaa3040e6a3481d0c4d73c4682020-11-25T02:16:36ZengElsevierPhysics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology2405-63162019-10-011216Intrafractional motion in stereotactic body radiotherapy of spinal metastases utilizing cone beam computed tomography image guidanceJørund Graadal Svestad0Christina Ramberg1Birgitte Skar2Taran Paulsen Hellebust3Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Corresponding author at: Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, P.O. Box 4953 Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo, Norway.Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, NorwayBackground and purpose: Spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) requires a high degree of accuracy due to steep dose gradients close to the spinal cord. This study aimed to (1) evaluate intrafractional motion in spine SBRT utilizing flattening filter free (FFF) beam delivery and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) image guidance and (2) evaluate if adding another CBCT acquisition and corrections prior to treatment improves the overall position accuracy. Materials and methods: Intrafractional motion was retrospectively analyzed for 78 fractions in 54 patients. All patients were immobilized with an evacuated cushion. Before treatment, a CBCT was acquired, a bony fusion with the planning CT was performed and translational and rotational errors were corrected. For 30 of the patients (39 fractions) acquisition of another CBCT and corrections were performed before treatment. A post treatment CBCT was acquired for all patients, and translational and rotational errors measured by fusion of the post treatment CBCT with the planning CT were recorded to calculate means and standard deviations (SDs). Results: The positional errors were significantly smaller in 4 out of 6 error values in the patient group treated with verification CBCT. In this group, translational and rotational SDs ranged from 0.5 to 0.6 mm and 0.3°, respectively. Corresponding values in the group treated without verification CBCT were 0.7–1.0 mm and 0.4–0.7°. Conclusion: With proper CBCT image guidance, patient immobilization and FFF-beam delivery, one can obtain very high patient position accuracy in spine SBRT. Inclusion of a verification CBCT prior to treatment increases the overall position accuracy. Keywords: Stereotactic body radiotherapy, Spine, Intrafractional motion, Cone beam computed tomography, Image guided radiotherapy, Flattening filter freehttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240563161930048X |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jørund Graadal Svestad Christina Ramberg Birgitte Skar Taran Paulsen Hellebust |
spellingShingle |
Jørund Graadal Svestad Christina Ramberg Birgitte Skar Taran Paulsen Hellebust Intrafractional motion in stereotactic body radiotherapy of spinal metastases utilizing cone beam computed tomography image guidance Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology |
author_facet |
Jørund Graadal Svestad Christina Ramberg Birgitte Skar Taran Paulsen Hellebust |
author_sort |
Jørund Graadal Svestad |
title |
Intrafractional motion in stereotactic body radiotherapy of spinal metastases utilizing cone beam computed tomography image guidance |
title_short |
Intrafractional motion in stereotactic body radiotherapy of spinal metastases utilizing cone beam computed tomography image guidance |
title_full |
Intrafractional motion in stereotactic body radiotherapy of spinal metastases utilizing cone beam computed tomography image guidance |
title_fullStr |
Intrafractional motion in stereotactic body radiotherapy of spinal metastases utilizing cone beam computed tomography image guidance |
title_full_unstemmed |
Intrafractional motion in stereotactic body radiotherapy of spinal metastases utilizing cone beam computed tomography image guidance |
title_sort |
intrafractional motion in stereotactic body radiotherapy of spinal metastases utilizing cone beam computed tomography image guidance |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology |
issn |
2405-6316 |
publishDate |
2019-10-01 |
description |
Background and purpose: Spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) requires a high degree of accuracy due to steep dose gradients close to the spinal cord. This study aimed to (1) evaluate intrafractional motion in spine SBRT utilizing flattening filter free (FFF) beam delivery and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) image guidance and (2) evaluate if adding another CBCT acquisition and corrections prior to treatment improves the overall position accuracy. Materials and methods: Intrafractional motion was retrospectively analyzed for 78 fractions in 54 patients. All patients were immobilized with an evacuated cushion. Before treatment, a CBCT was acquired, a bony fusion with the planning CT was performed and translational and rotational errors were corrected. For 30 of the patients (39 fractions) acquisition of another CBCT and corrections were performed before treatment. A post treatment CBCT was acquired for all patients, and translational and rotational errors measured by fusion of the post treatment CBCT with the planning CT were recorded to calculate means and standard deviations (SDs). Results: The positional errors were significantly smaller in 4 out of 6 error values in the patient group treated with verification CBCT. In this group, translational and rotational SDs ranged from 0.5 to 0.6 mm and 0.3°, respectively. Corresponding values in the group treated without verification CBCT were 0.7–1.0 mm and 0.4–0.7°. Conclusion: With proper CBCT image guidance, patient immobilization and FFF-beam delivery, one can obtain very high patient position accuracy in spine SBRT. Inclusion of a verification CBCT prior to treatment increases the overall position accuracy. Keywords: Stereotactic body radiotherapy, Spine, Intrafractional motion, Cone beam computed tomography, Image guided radiotherapy, Flattening filter free |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240563161930048X |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jørundgraadalsvestad intrafractionalmotioninstereotacticbodyradiotherapyofspinalmetastasesutilizingconebeamcomputedtomographyimageguidance AT christinaramberg intrafractionalmotioninstereotacticbodyradiotherapyofspinalmetastasesutilizingconebeamcomputedtomographyimageguidance AT birgitteskar intrafractionalmotioninstereotacticbodyradiotherapyofspinalmetastasesutilizingconebeamcomputedtomographyimageguidance AT taranpaulsenhellebust intrafractionalmotioninstereotacticbodyradiotherapyofspinalmetastasesutilizingconebeamcomputedtomographyimageguidance |
_version_ |
1724890327675830272 |