Intrafractional motion in stereotactic body radiotherapy of spinal metastases utilizing cone beam computed tomography image guidance

Background and purpose: Spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) requires a high degree of accuracy due to steep dose gradients close to the spinal cord. This study aimed to (1) evaluate intrafractional motion in spine SBRT utilizing flattening filter free (FFF) beam delivery and cone beam comput...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jørund Graadal Svestad, Christina Ramberg, Birgitte Skar, Taran Paulsen Hellebust
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-10-01
Series:Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240563161930048X
id doaj-bc4299faaa3040e6a3481d0c4d73c468
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bc4299faaa3040e6a3481d0c4d73c4682020-11-25T02:16:36ZengElsevierPhysics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology2405-63162019-10-011216Intrafractional motion in stereotactic body radiotherapy of spinal metastases utilizing cone beam computed tomography image guidanceJørund Graadal Svestad0Christina Ramberg1Birgitte Skar2Taran Paulsen Hellebust3Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Corresponding author at: Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, P.O. Box 4953 Nydalen, NO-0424 Oslo, Norway.Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, NorwayBackground and purpose: Spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) requires a high degree of accuracy due to steep dose gradients close to the spinal cord. This study aimed to (1) evaluate intrafractional motion in spine SBRT utilizing flattening filter free (FFF) beam delivery and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) image guidance and (2) evaluate if adding another CBCT acquisition and corrections prior to treatment improves the overall position accuracy. Materials and methods: Intrafractional motion was retrospectively analyzed for 78 fractions in 54 patients. All patients were immobilized with an evacuated cushion. Before treatment, a CBCT was acquired, a bony fusion with the planning CT was performed and translational and rotational errors were corrected. For 30 of the patients (39 fractions) acquisition of another CBCT and corrections were performed before treatment. A post treatment CBCT was acquired for all patients, and translational and rotational errors measured by fusion of the post treatment CBCT with the planning CT were recorded to calculate means and standard deviations (SDs). Results: The positional errors were significantly smaller in 4 out of 6 error values in the patient group treated with verification CBCT. In this group, translational and rotational SDs ranged from 0.5 to 0.6 mm and 0.3°, respectively. Corresponding values in the group treated without verification CBCT were 0.7–1.0 mm and 0.4–0.7°. Conclusion: With proper CBCT image guidance, patient immobilization and FFF-beam delivery, one can obtain very high patient position accuracy in spine SBRT. Inclusion of a verification CBCT prior to treatment increases the overall position accuracy. Keywords: Stereotactic body radiotherapy, Spine, Intrafractional motion, Cone beam computed tomography, Image guided radiotherapy, Flattening filter freehttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240563161930048X
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jørund Graadal Svestad
Christina Ramberg
Birgitte Skar
Taran Paulsen Hellebust
spellingShingle Jørund Graadal Svestad
Christina Ramberg
Birgitte Skar
Taran Paulsen Hellebust
Intrafractional motion in stereotactic body radiotherapy of spinal metastases utilizing cone beam computed tomography image guidance
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
author_facet Jørund Graadal Svestad
Christina Ramberg
Birgitte Skar
Taran Paulsen Hellebust
author_sort Jørund Graadal Svestad
title Intrafractional motion in stereotactic body radiotherapy of spinal metastases utilizing cone beam computed tomography image guidance
title_short Intrafractional motion in stereotactic body radiotherapy of spinal metastases utilizing cone beam computed tomography image guidance
title_full Intrafractional motion in stereotactic body radiotherapy of spinal metastases utilizing cone beam computed tomography image guidance
title_fullStr Intrafractional motion in stereotactic body radiotherapy of spinal metastases utilizing cone beam computed tomography image guidance
title_full_unstemmed Intrafractional motion in stereotactic body radiotherapy of spinal metastases utilizing cone beam computed tomography image guidance
title_sort intrafractional motion in stereotactic body radiotherapy of spinal metastases utilizing cone beam computed tomography image guidance
publisher Elsevier
series Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
issn 2405-6316
publishDate 2019-10-01
description Background and purpose: Spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) requires a high degree of accuracy due to steep dose gradients close to the spinal cord. This study aimed to (1) evaluate intrafractional motion in spine SBRT utilizing flattening filter free (FFF) beam delivery and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) image guidance and (2) evaluate if adding another CBCT acquisition and corrections prior to treatment improves the overall position accuracy. Materials and methods: Intrafractional motion was retrospectively analyzed for 78 fractions in 54 patients. All patients were immobilized with an evacuated cushion. Before treatment, a CBCT was acquired, a bony fusion with the planning CT was performed and translational and rotational errors were corrected. For 30 of the patients (39 fractions) acquisition of another CBCT and corrections were performed before treatment. A post treatment CBCT was acquired for all patients, and translational and rotational errors measured by fusion of the post treatment CBCT with the planning CT were recorded to calculate means and standard deviations (SDs). Results: The positional errors were significantly smaller in 4 out of 6 error values in the patient group treated with verification CBCT. In this group, translational and rotational SDs ranged from 0.5 to 0.6 mm and 0.3°, respectively. Corresponding values in the group treated without verification CBCT were 0.7–1.0 mm and 0.4–0.7°. Conclusion: With proper CBCT image guidance, patient immobilization and FFF-beam delivery, one can obtain very high patient position accuracy in spine SBRT. Inclusion of a verification CBCT prior to treatment increases the overall position accuracy. Keywords: Stereotactic body radiotherapy, Spine, Intrafractional motion, Cone beam computed tomography, Image guided radiotherapy, Flattening filter free
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240563161930048X
work_keys_str_mv AT jørundgraadalsvestad intrafractionalmotioninstereotacticbodyradiotherapyofspinalmetastasesutilizingconebeamcomputedtomographyimageguidance
AT christinaramberg intrafractionalmotioninstereotacticbodyradiotherapyofspinalmetastasesutilizingconebeamcomputedtomographyimageguidance
AT birgitteskar intrafractionalmotioninstereotacticbodyradiotherapyofspinalmetastasesutilizingconebeamcomputedtomographyimageguidance
AT taranpaulsenhellebust intrafractionalmotioninstereotacticbodyradiotherapyofspinalmetastasesutilizingconebeamcomputedtomographyimageguidance
_version_ 1724890327675830272