Social vs. Individual Centrality of Religiosity: Research in Religious and Non-Religious Settings in Russia

Most of the current approaches to measuring religiosity operate with indicators of individual religiosity. One of the central ideas of the current paper is that religiosity is a social phenomenon. The Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS) developed by S. Huber is applied to measure the individual co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Elena Prutskova
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-12-01
Series:Religions
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/1/15
id doaj-bc3851ada5044c8ba96db38a9d19a421
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bc3851ada5044c8ba96db38a9d19a4212020-12-26T00:03:35ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442021-12-0112151510.3390/rel12010015Social vs. Individual Centrality of Religiosity: Research in Religious and Non-Religious Settings in RussiaElena Prutskova0“Sociology of Religion” Research Laboratory, St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University, 127051 Moscow, RussiaMost of the current approaches to measuring religiosity operate with indicators of individual religiosity. One of the central ideas of the current paper is that religiosity is a social phenomenon. The Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS) developed by S. Huber is applied to measure the individual component of religiosity. A modification of the CRS (CRS-SOC) has been developed to include the social component of religiosity with two aspects: social connections with lay members of religious communities and with the clergy. The analysis is based on the data of two surveys conducted in Russia: an on-line survey with a general population sample (1768 respondents) and a survey of parishioners of four Christian denominations: Orthodox, Catholic, “traditional” Protestant (Lutheran, Baptist), and the “new” Protestant (Pentecostal) (1192 respondents). The structure of religiosity among parishioners of different Christian denominations is discussed. The results, which revealed that the level of religiosity among Orthodox parishioners is slightly lower, are interpreted using the theory of religious economy.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/1/15Centrality of Religiosity Scalereligiosity dimensionsparish communityindividual religiositysocial religiosity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Elena Prutskova
spellingShingle Elena Prutskova
Social vs. Individual Centrality of Religiosity: Research in Religious and Non-Religious Settings in Russia
Religions
Centrality of Religiosity Scale
religiosity dimensions
parish community
individual religiosity
social religiosity
author_facet Elena Prutskova
author_sort Elena Prutskova
title Social vs. Individual Centrality of Religiosity: Research in Religious and Non-Religious Settings in Russia
title_short Social vs. Individual Centrality of Religiosity: Research in Religious and Non-Religious Settings in Russia
title_full Social vs. Individual Centrality of Religiosity: Research in Religious and Non-Religious Settings in Russia
title_fullStr Social vs. Individual Centrality of Religiosity: Research in Religious and Non-Religious Settings in Russia
title_full_unstemmed Social vs. Individual Centrality of Religiosity: Research in Religious and Non-Religious Settings in Russia
title_sort social vs. individual centrality of religiosity: research in religious and non-religious settings in russia
publisher MDPI AG
series Religions
issn 2077-1444
publishDate 2021-12-01
description Most of the current approaches to measuring religiosity operate with indicators of individual religiosity. One of the central ideas of the current paper is that religiosity is a social phenomenon. The Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS) developed by S. Huber is applied to measure the individual component of religiosity. A modification of the CRS (CRS-SOC) has been developed to include the social component of religiosity with two aspects: social connections with lay members of religious communities and with the clergy. The analysis is based on the data of two surveys conducted in Russia: an on-line survey with a general population sample (1768 respondents) and a survey of parishioners of four Christian denominations: Orthodox, Catholic, “traditional” Protestant (Lutheran, Baptist), and the “new” Protestant (Pentecostal) (1192 respondents). The structure of religiosity among parishioners of different Christian denominations is discussed. The results, which revealed that the level of religiosity among Orthodox parishioners is slightly lower, are interpreted using the theory of religious economy.
topic Centrality of Religiosity Scale
religiosity dimensions
parish community
individual religiosity
social religiosity
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/1/15
work_keys_str_mv AT elenaprutskova socialvsindividualcentralityofreligiosityresearchinreligiousandnonreligioussettingsinrussia
_version_ 1724370667482120192