Methods for Animal Brain Mapping
Measurements of brain electrical activity in animals are essential for the validation of the pharmaco-effect of drugs. The way to evaluate these recordings should be comparable to that of EEG in humans. Methods that visualize the results of the measured EEG recording include brain mapping in two-dim...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Spolecnost pro radioelektronicke inzenyrstvi
2018-08-01
|
Series: | Radioengineering |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.radioeng.cz/fulltexts/2018/18_03_0806_0812.pdf |
id |
doaj-bc1c48ee49224809aec6cf8550de962c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-bc1c48ee49224809aec6cf8550de962c2020-11-25T00:04:16ZengSpolecnost pro radioelektronicke inzenyrstviRadioengineering1210-25122018-08-01273806812Methods for Animal Brain MappingV. PioreckaV. KrajcaF. TylsT. PalenicekMeasurements of brain electrical activity in animals are essential for the validation of the pharmaco-effect of drugs. The way to evaluate these recordings should be comparable to that of EEG in humans. Methods that visualize the results of the measured EEG recording include brain mapping in two-dimensional or three-dimensional space. The most commonly used methods of interpolation techniques in humans are spherical splines and 3D splines. We measured nine brains of Wistar rats and compared them with a brain model from the atlas (Brain Atlas Reconstructor, BAR). We validated the brain model of Wistar rat for future use. We implemented a module in MATLAB 2015a for brain mapping, specifically, we implemented algorithms for spherical and 3D spline mapping. The root mean square error of the spherical spline method is 0.5943 in the case of testing signal and 0.6291/0.6388 in the case of real data estimation. The root mean square error of the 3D spline method is 0.4334 in the case of testing signal and 0.0849/0.0768 in the case of real data estimation. Our results show that the 3D spline method with the projection on sphere gives significantly better 3D potential map than spherical splines.https://www.radioeng.cz/fulltexts/2018/18_03_0806_0812.pdfAnimal EEGbrain mapping3D splinespherical spline |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
V. Piorecka V. Krajca F. Tyls T. Palenicek |
spellingShingle |
V. Piorecka V. Krajca F. Tyls T. Palenicek Methods for Animal Brain Mapping Radioengineering Animal EEG brain mapping 3D spline spherical spline |
author_facet |
V. Piorecka V. Krajca F. Tyls T. Palenicek |
author_sort |
V. Piorecka |
title |
Methods for Animal Brain Mapping |
title_short |
Methods for Animal Brain Mapping |
title_full |
Methods for Animal Brain Mapping |
title_fullStr |
Methods for Animal Brain Mapping |
title_full_unstemmed |
Methods for Animal Brain Mapping |
title_sort |
methods for animal brain mapping |
publisher |
Spolecnost pro radioelektronicke inzenyrstvi |
series |
Radioengineering |
issn |
1210-2512 |
publishDate |
2018-08-01 |
description |
Measurements of brain electrical activity in animals are essential for the validation of the pharmaco-effect of drugs. The way to evaluate these recordings should be comparable to that of EEG in humans. Methods that visualize the results of the measured EEG recording include brain mapping in two-dimensional or three-dimensional space. The most commonly used methods of interpolation techniques in humans are spherical splines and 3D splines. We measured nine brains of Wistar rats and compared them with a brain model from the atlas (Brain Atlas Reconstructor, BAR). We validated the brain model of Wistar rat for future use. We implemented a module in MATLAB 2015a for brain mapping, specifically, we implemented algorithms for spherical and 3D spline mapping. The root mean square error of the spherical spline method is 0.5943 in the case of testing signal and 0.6291/0.6388 in the case of real data estimation. The root mean square error of the 3D spline method is 0.4334 in the case of testing signal and 0.0849/0.0768 in the case of real data estimation. Our results show that the 3D spline method with the projection on sphere gives significantly better 3D potential map than spherical splines. |
topic |
Animal EEG brain mapping 3D spline spherical spline |
url |
https://www.radioeng.cz/fulltexts/2018/18_03_0806_0812.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT vpiorecka methodsforanimalbrainmapping AT vkrajca methodsforanimalbrainmapping AT ftyls methodsforanimalbrainmapping AT tpalenicek methodsforanimalbrainmapping |
_version_ |
1725430368046153728 |