Methods for Animal Brain Mapping

Measurements of brain electrical activity in animals are essential for the validation of the pharmaco-effect of drugs. The way to evaluate these recordings should be comparable to that of EEG in humans. Methods that visualize the results of the measured EEG recording include brain mapping in two-dim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: V. Piorecka, V. Krajca, F. Tyls, T. Palenicek
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Spolecnost pro radioelektronicke inzenyrstvi 2018-08-01
Series:Radioengineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.radioeng.cz/fulltexts/2018/18_03_0806_0812.pdf
id doaj-bc1c48ee49224809aec6cf8550de962c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bc1c48ee49224809aec6cf8550de962c2020-11-25T00:04:16ZengSpolecnost pro radioelektronicke inzenyrstviRadioengineering1210-25122018-08-01273806812Methods for Animal Brain MappingV. PioreckaV. KrajcaF. TylsT. PalenicekMeasurements of brain electrical activity in animals are essential for the validation of the pharmaco-effect of drugs. The way to evaluate these recordings should be comparable to that of EEG in humans. Methods that visualize the results of the measured EEG recording include brain mapping in two-dimensional or three-dimensional space. The most commonly used methods of interpolation techniques in humans are spherical splines and 3D splines. We measured nine brains of Wistar rats and compared them with a brain model from the atlas (Brain Atlas Reconstructor, BAR). We validated the brain model of Wistar rat for future use. We implemented a module in MATLAB 2015a for brain mapping, specifically, we implemented algorithms for spherical and 3D spline mapping. The root mean square error of the spherical spline method is 0.5943 in the case of testing signal and 0.6291/0.6388 in the case of real data estimation. The root mean square error of the 3D spline method is 0.4334 in the case of testing signal and 0.0849/0.0768 in the case of real data estimation. Our results show that the 3D spline method with the projection on sphere gives significantly better 3D potential map than spherical splines.https://www.radioeng.cz/fulltexts/2018/18_03_0806_0812.pdfAnimal EEGbrain mapping3D splinespherical spline
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author V. Piorecka
V. Krajca
F. Tyls
T. Palenicek
spellingShingle V. Piorecka
V. Krajca
F. Tyls
T. Palenicek
Methods for Animal Brain Mapping
Radioengineering
Animal EEG
brain mapping
3D spline
spherical spline
author_facet V. Piorecka
V. Krajca
F. Tyls
T. Palenicek
author_sort V. Piorecka
title Methods for Animal Brain Mapping
title_short Methods for Animal Brain Mapping
title_full Methods for Animal Brain Mapping
title_fullStr Methods for Animal Brain Mapping
title_full_unstemmed Methods for Animal Brain Mapping
title_sort methods for animal brain mapping
publisher Spolecnost pro radioelektronicke inzenyrstvi
series Radioengineering
issn 1210-2512
publishDate 2018-08-01
description Measurements of brain electrical activity in animals are essential for the validation of the pharmaco-effect of drugs. The way to evaluate these recordings should be comparable to that of EEG in humans. Methods that visualize the results of the measured EEG recording include brain mapping in two-dimensional or three-dimensional space. The most commonly used methods of interpolation techniques in humans are spherical splines and 3D splines. We measured nine brains of Wistar rats and compared them with a brain model from the atlas (Brain Atlas Reconstructor, BAR). We validated the brain model of Wistar rat for future use. We implemented a module in MATLAB 2015a for brain mapping, specifically, we implemented algorithms for spherical and 3D spline mapping. The root mean square error of the spherical spline method is 0.5943 in the case of testing signal and 0.6291/0.6388 in the case of real data estimation. The root mean square error of the 3D spline method is 0.4334 in the case of testing signal and 0.0849/0.0768 in the case of real data estimation. Our results show that the 3D spline method with the projection on sphere gives significantly better 3D potential map than spherical splines.
topic Animal EEG
brain mapping
3D spline
spherical spline
url https://www.radioeng.cz/fulltexts/2018/18_03_0806_0812.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT vpiorecka methodsforanimalbrainmapping
AT vkrajca methodsforanimalbrainmapping
AT ftyls methodsforanimalbrainmapping
AT tpalenicek methodsforanimalbrainmapping
_version_ 1725430368046153728