Bioimage informatics approach to automated meibomian gland analysis in infrared images of meibography

• Main Authors: Turgay Celik, Hwee Kuan Lee, Andrea Petznick, Louis Tong
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier 2013-10-01
• Series: Journal of Optometry
• Subjects: Dry eye syndrome; Meibography; Diagnosis; Computer vision; Machine learning; Image processing; Meibomian gland segmentation; Gabor filtering; Ridge detection; Valley detection; Edge detection
• Online Access: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429613000629

Background: Infrared (IR) meibography is an imaging technique to capture the Meibomian glands in the eyelids. These ocular surface structures are responsible for producing the lipid layer of the tear film which helps to reduce tear evaporation. In a normal healthy eye, the glands have similar morphological features in terms of spatial width, in-plane elongation, length. On the other hand, eyes with Meibomian gland dysfunction show visible structural irregularities that help in the diagnosis and prognosis of the disease. However, currently there is no universally accepted algorithm for detection of these image features which will be clinically useful. We aim to develop a method of automated gland segmentation which allows images to be classified. Methods: A set of 131 meibography images were acquired from patients from the Singapore National Eye Center. We used a method of automated gland segmentation using Gabor wavelets. Features of the imaged glands including orientation, width, length and curvature were extracted and the IR images enhanced. The images were classified as ‘healthy’, ‘intermediate’ or ‘unhealthy’, through the use of a support vector machine classifier (SVM). Half the images were used for training the SVM and the other half for validation. Independently of this procedure, the meibographs were classified by an expert clinician into the same 3 grades. Results: The algorithm correctly detected 94% and 98% of mid-line pixels of gland and inter-gland regions, respectively, on healthy images. On intermediate images, correct detection rates of 92% and 97% of mid-line pixels of gland and inter-gland regions were achieved respectively. The true positive rate of detecting healthy images was 86%, and for intermediate images, 74%. The corresponding false positive rates were 15% and 31% respectively. Using the SVM, the proposed method has 88% accuracy in classifying images into the 3 classes. The classification of images into healthy and unhealthy classes achieved a 100% accuracy, but 7/38 intermediate images were incorrectly classified. Conclusions: This technique of image analysis in meibography can help clinicians to interpret the degree of gland destruction in patients with dry eye and meibomian gland dysfunction.