Fundamental Outcome Measurement: Selecting Patient Reported Outcome Instruments and Interpreting the Data they Produce
Over the past 40 years literally thousands of generic and disease specific patient reported outcome (PRO) instruments have been developed. While most were developed for a specific study and were never used again, there is still the question of how manufacturers and others should select a PRO instru...
Main Authors: | Stephen P McKenna, Alice Heaney, Paul C Langley |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing
2021-05-01
|
Series: | INNOVATIONS in Pharmacy |
Online Access: | https://pubs.lib.umn.edu/index.php/innovations/article/view/3911 |
Similar Items
-
Fundamental Measurement: The Need Fulfilment Quality of Life (N-QOL) Measure
by: Paul C. Langley, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01) -
Measuring patient-reported outcomes: moving beyond misplaced common sense to hard science
by: McKenna Stephen P
Published: (2011-07-01) -
Interpreting scores on multiple sclerosis-specific patient reported outcome measures (the PRIMUS and U-FIS)
by: McKenna Stephen P, et al.
Published: (2010-10-01) -
Patient reported outcomes : from selection to interpretation
by: McColl, Elaine
Published: (2005) -
Measurement, modeling and QALYs [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
by: Paul C. Langley, et al.
Published: (2020-08-01)