The Contributions of Crosslinguistic Influence and Individual Differences to Nonnative Speech Perception

Perception of a nonnative language (L2) is known to be affected by crosslinguistic transfer from a listener’s native language (L1), but the relative importance of L1 transfer vis-a-vis individual learner differences remains unclear. This study explored the hypothesis that the nature of L1 transfer c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Charles B. Chang, Sungmi Kwon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-10-01
Series:Languages
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/5/4/49
id doaj-bc0f5ba06f6448b0b24b80bdec097e07
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bc0f5ba06f6448b0b24b80bdec097e072020-11-25T03:35:59ZengMDPI AGLanguages2226-471X2020-10-015494910.3390/languages5040049The Contributions of Crosslinguistic Influence and Individual Differences to Nonnative Speech PerceptionCharles B. Chang0Sungmi Kwon1Department of Linguistics, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USADepartment of Korean Language and Literature, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, KoreaPerception of a nonnative language (L2) is known to be affected by crosslinguistic transfer from a listener’s native language (L1), but the relative importance of L1 transfer vis-a-vis individual learner differences remains unclear. This study explored the hypothesis that the nature of L1 transfer changes as learners gain experience with the L2, such that individual differences are more influential at earlier stages of learning and L1 transfer is more influential at later stages of learning. To test this hypothesis, novice L2 learners of Korean from diverse L1 backgrounds were examined in a pretest-posttest design with respect to their perceptual acquisition of novel L2 consonant contrasts (the three-way Korean laryngeal contrast among lenis, fortis, and aspirated plosives) and vowel contrasts (/o/-/ʌ/, /u/-/ɨ/). Whereas pretest performance showed little evidence of L1 effects, posttest performance showed significant L1 transfer. Furthermore, pretest performance did not predict posttest performance. These findings support the view that L1 knowledge influences L2 perception dynamically, according to the amount of L2 knowledge available to learners at that time. That is, both individual differences and L1 knowledge play a role in L2 perception, but to different degrees over the course of L2 development.https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/5/4/49second language acquisitionperceptual learningindividual differencesphonetic sensitivitycrosslinguistic influenceKorean
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Charles B. Chang
Sungmi Kwon
spellingShingle Charles B. Chang
Sungmi Kwon
The Contributions of Crosslinguistic Influence and Individual Differences to Nonnative Speech Perception
Languages
second language acquisition
perceptual learning
individual differences
phonetic sensitivity
crosslinguistic influence
Korean
author_facet Charles B. Chang
Sungmi Kwon
author_sort Charles B. Chang
title The Contributions of Crosslinguistic Influence and Individual Differences to Nonnative Speech Perception
title_short The Contributions of Crosslinguistic Influence and Individual Differences to Nonnative Speech Perception
title_full The Contributions of Crosslinguistic Influence and Individual Differences to Nonnative Speech Perception
title_fullStr The Contributions of Crosslinguistic Influence and Individual Differences to Nonnative Speech Perception
title_full_unstemmed The Contributions of Crosslinguistic Influence and Individual Differences to Nonnative Speech Perception
title_sort contributions of crosslinguistic influence and individual differences to nonnative speech perception
publisher MDPI AG
series Languages
issn 2226-471X
publishDate 2020-10-01
description Perception of a nonnative language (L2) is known to be affected by crosslinguistic transfer from a listener’s native language (L1), but the relative importance of L1 transfer vis-a-vis individual learner differences remains unclear. This study explored the hypothesis that the nature of L1 transfer changes as learners gain experience with the L2, such that individual differences are more influential at earlier stages of learning and L1 transfer is more influential at later stages of learning. To test this hypothesis, novice L2 learners of Korean from diverse L1 backgrounds were examined in a pretest-posttest design with respect to their perceptual acquisition of novel L2 consonant contrasts (the three-way Korean laryngeal contrast among lenis, fortis, and aspirated plosives) and vowel contrasts (/o/-/ʌ/, /u/-/ɨ/). Whereas pretest performance showed little evidence of L1 effects, posttest performance showed significant L1 transfer. Furthermore, pretest performance did not predict posttest performance. These findings support the view that L1 knowledge influences L2 perception dynamically, according to the amount of L2 knowledge available to learners at that time. That is, both individual differences and L1 knowledge play a role in L2 perception, but to different degrees over the course of L2 development.
topic second language acquisition
perceptual learning
individual differences
phonetic sensitivity
crosslinguistic influence
Korean
url https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/5/4/49
work_keys_str_mv AT charlesbchang thecontributionsofcrosslinguisticinfluenceandindividualdifferencestononnativespeechperception
AT sungmikwon thecontributionsofcrosslinguisticinfluenceandindividualdifferencestononnativespeechperception
AT charlesbchang contributionsofcrosslinguisticinfluenceandindividualdifferencestononnativespeechperception
AT sungmikwon contributionsofcrosslinguisticinfluenceandindividualdifferencestononnativespeechperception
_version_ 1724552013660815360