Laser microgrooved vs. machined healing abutment disconnection/reconnection: a comparative clinical, radiographical and biochemical study with split-mouth design

Abstract Background Repeated removal and replacement of healing abutments result in frequent injuries to the soft tissues. Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of disconnection/reconnection of laser microgrooved vs. machined healing and prosthetic abutments on clinical period...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Renzo Guarnieri, Gabriele Miccoli, Rodolfo Reda, Alessandro Mazzoni, Dario Di Nardo, Luca Testarelli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2021-03-01
Series:International Journal of Implant Dentistry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00301-6
id doaj-bc02f2c6cb5e400e91c7579913fab36d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bc02f2c6cb5e400e91c7579913fab36d2021-03-21T12:19:27ZengSpringerOpenInternational Journal of Implant Dentistry2198-40342021-03-017111110.1186/s40729-021-00301-6Laser microgrooved vs. machined healing abutment disconnection/reconnection: a comparative clinical, radiographical and biochemical study with split-mouth designRenzo Guarnieri0Gabriele Miccoli1Rodolfo Reda2Alessandro Mazzoni3Dario Di Nardo4Luca Testarelli5Department of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Sciences, La Sapienza University of RomeDepartment of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Sciences, La Sapienza University of RomeDepartment of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Sciences, La Sapienza University of RomeDepartment of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Sciences, La Sapienza University of RomeDepartment of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Sciences, La Sapienza University of RomeDepartment of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Sciences, La Sapienza University of RomeAbstract Background Repeated removal and replacement of healing abutments result in frequent injuries to the soft tissues. Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of disconnection/reconnection of laser microgrooved vs. machined healing and prosthetic abutments on clinical periodontal parameters, marginal bone levels, and proinflammatory cytokine levels around dental implants. Material and methods Twenty-four patients each received 2 implants with one-stage protocol in a split-mouth design on the same jaw. In each patient, one healing and prosthetic abutments with a laser microgrooved surface (LMS group) and one healing and prosthetic abutments with machined surface (MS group) were used. Four months following implant placement (T0), the healing abutments were disconnnected and reconnected three times to carry out the impression procedures and metal framework try-in. Four weeks later (T1), definitive prosthetic abutments were installated with screw-retained crowns. Modified plaque index (mPI), modified gingival index (mGI) bleeding on probing (BOP), and probing depth (PD) were recorded at T0 and T1. At the same time points, samples for immunological analyses were taken from the sulcus around each implant. Peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) samples were analyzed for interleukin-1beta (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α levels using the ELISA kit. Results At T0 and T1, mPI and mGI showed no statistical difference between the two groups, while higher PD and BoP values were noted for the MS group (P < 0.05). The mean PICF volume and mean concentrations of IL-1β, IL-6, and (TNF)-α in the LMS group were statistically less than those in the MS group (P < 0.05). In addition, comparison of IL-6 and IL-1β mean concentrations at T0 and T1 in the MS group showed a statistically significant increase (p < 0.05) over time, which was not noted for the LMS. Conclusion Disconnection/reconnection of healing and prosthetic abutments with a laser-microgrooved surface resulted in less inflammatory molecular response compared with conventional machined ones. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04415801 , registered 03/06/2020https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00301-6Peri-implant crevicular fluidInflammationAbutmentsCytokines
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Renzo Guarnieri
Gabriele Miccoli
Rodolfo Reda
Alessandro Mazzoni
Dario Di Nardo
Luca Testarelli
spellingShingle Renzo Guarnieri
Gabriele Miccoli
Rodolfo Reda
Alessandro Mazzoni
Dario Di Nardo
Luca Testarelli
Laser microgrooved vs. machined healing abutment disconnection/reconnection: a comparative clinical, radiographical and biochemical study with split-mouth design
International Journal of Implant Dentistry
Peri-implant crevicular fluid
Inflammation
Abutments
Cytokines
author_facet Renzo Guarnieri
Gabriele Miccoli
Rodolfo Reda
Alessandro Mazzoni
Dario Di Nardo
Luca Testarelli
author_sort Renzo Guarnieri
title Laser microgrooved vs. machined healing abutment disconnection/reconnection: a comparative clinical, radiographical and biochemical study with split-mouth design
title_short Laser microgrooved vs. machined healing abutment disconnection/reconnection: a comparative clinical, radiographical and biochemical study with split-mouth design
title_full Laser microgrooved vs. machined healing abutment disconnection/reconnection: a comparative clinical, radiographical and biochemical study with split-mouth design
title_fullStr Laser microgrooved vs. machined healing abutment disconnection/reconnection: a comparative clinical, radiographical and biochemical study with split-mouth design
title_full_unstemmed Laser microgrooved vs. machined healing abutment disconnection/reconnection: a comparative clinical, radiographical and biochemical study with split-mouth design
title_sort laser microgrooved vs. machined healing abutment disconnection/reconnection: a comparative clinical, radiographical and biochemical study with split-mouth design
publisher SpringerOpen
series International Journal of Implant Dentistry
issn 2198-4034
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Abstract Background Repeated removal and replacement of healing abutments result in frequent injuries to the soft tissues. Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of disconnection/reconnection of laser microgrooved vs. machined healing and prosthetic abutments on clinical periodontal parameters, marginal bone levels, and proinflammatory cytokine levels around dental implants. Material and methods Twenty-four patients each received 2 implants with one-stage protocol in a split-mouth design on the same jaw. In each patient, one healing and prosthetic abutments with a laser microgrooved surface (LMS group) and one healing and prosthetic abutments with machined surface (MS group) were used. Four months following implant placement (T0), the healing abutments were disconnnected and reconnected three times to carry out the impression procedures and metal framework try-in. Four weeks later (T1), definitive prosthetic abutments were installated with screw-retained crowns. Modified plaque index (mPI), modified gingival index (mGI) bleeding on probing (BOP), and probing depth (PD) were recorded at T0 and T1. At the same time points, samples for immunological analyses were taken from the sulcus around each implant. Peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) samples were analyzed for interleukin-1beta (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α levels using the ELISA kit. Results At T0 and T1, mPI and mGI showed no statistical difference between the two groups, while higher PD and BoP values were noted for the MS group (P < 0.05). The mean PICF volume and mean concentrations of IL-1β, IL-6, and (TNF)-α in the LMS group were statistically less than those in the MS group (P < 0.05). In addition, comparison of IL-6 and IL-1β mean concentrations at T0 and T1 in the MS group showed a statistically significant increase (p < 0.05) over time, which was not noted for the LMS. Conclusion Disconnection/reconnection of healing and prosthetic abutments with a laser-microgrooved surface resulted in less inflammatory molecular response compared with conventional machined ones. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04415801 , registered 03/06/2020
topic Peri-implant crevicular fluid
Inflammation
Abutments
Cytokines
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00301-6
work_keys_str_mv AT renzoguarnieri lasermicrogroovedvsmachinedhealingabutmentdisconnectionreconnectionacomparativeclinicalradiographicalandbiochemicalstudywithsplitmouthdesign
AT gabrielemiccoli lasermicrogroovedvsmachinedhealingabutmentdisconnectionreconnectionacomparativeclinicalradiographicalandbiochemicalstudywithsplitmouthdesign
AT rodolforeda lasermicrogroovedvsmachinedhealingabutmentdisconnectionreconnectionacomparativeclinicalradiographicalandbiochemicalstudywithsplitmouthdesign
AT alessandromazzoni lasermicrogroovedvsmachinedhealingabutmentdisconnectionreconnectionacomparativeclinicalradiographicalandbiochemicalstudywithsplitmouthdesign
AT dariodinardo lasermicrogroovedvsmachinedhealingabutmentdisconnectionreconnectionacomparativeclinicalradiographicalandbiochemicalstudywithsplitmouthdesign
AT lucatestarelli lasermicrogroovedvsmachinedhealingabutmentdisconnectionreconnectionacomparativeclinicalradiographicalandbiochemicalstudywithsplitmouthdesign
_version_ 1724210675276840960