Where to look for power Laws in urban road networks?

Abstract Spatial embeddedness and planarity of urban road networks limit the range of their node degree values. Therefore, pursuing analysis based on the distribution of node degrees e.g. scale free aspect could not be accomplished in urban road networks. We have inspected the distribution of degree...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Meisam Akbarzadeh, Soroush Memarmontazerin, Sheida Soleimani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2018-04-01
Series:Applied Network Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41109-018-0060-9
id doaj-bc00d0063c6d4c5aa9bd7fc9a07501a5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bc00d0063c6d4c5aa9bd7fc9a07501a52020-11-25T01:00:24ZengSpringerOpenApplied Network Science2364-82282018-04-013111110.1007/s41109-018-0060-9Where to look for power Laws in urban road networks?Meisam Akbarzadeh0Soroush Memarmontazerin1Sheida Soleimani2Department of Transportation Engineering, Isfahan University of TechnologyDepartment of Transportation Engineering, Isfahan University of TechnologyDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of IsfahanAbstract Spatial embeddedness and planarity of urban road networks limit the range of their node degree values. Therefore, pursuing analysis based on the distribution of node degrees e.g. scale free aspect could not be accomplished in urban road networks. We have inspected the distribution of degree, betweenness centrality, weighted degree (based on incident link capacities), and alpha weighted degree for eight urban road networks across the world. These networks are abstracted from Philadelphia (USA), Berlin (Germany), Chicago (USA), Anaheim (USA), Gold Coast (Australia), Birmingham (UK), and Isfahan (Iran). Our results show that although the degree (weighted and unweighted) distributions of these networks are totally different, they all show power law distributions in betweenness centrality. Thus, scale free aspect could be observed in the betweenness centrality distribution. We then analyzed the collapse of network as a result of node removals. The collapse patterns suggest that critical nodes of urban road networks could not be detected solely based on betweenness centrality. Therefore, we conclude that the concept of betweenness centrality in urban road networks is more of functional merit than topological merit. In other words, central nodes play an important role in transmitting the flow but their loss would not harm the connectivity of urban networks. This claim is supported by analyzing the correlation among node flow and node betweenness in Isfahan and Anaheim.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41109-018-0060-9Urban road networksCentralityPower lawVulnerability
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Meisam Akbarzadeh
Soroush Memarmontazerin
Sheida Soleimani
spellingShingle Meisam Akbarzadeh
Soroush Memarmontazerin
Sheida Soleimani
Where to look for power Laws in urban road networks?
Applied Network Science
Urban road networks
Centrality
Power law
Vulnerability
author_facet Meisam Akbarzadeh
Soroush Memarmontazerin
Sheida Soleimani
author_sort Meisam Akbarzadeh
title Where to look for power Laws in urban road networks?
title_short Where to look for power Laws in urban road networks?
title_full Where to look for power Laws in urban road networks?
title_fullStr Where to look for power Laws in urban road networks?
title_full_unstemmed Where to look for power Laws in urban road networks?
title_sort where to look for power laws in urban road networks?
publisher SpringerOpen
series Applied Network Science
issn 2364-8228
publishDate 2018-04-01
description Abstract Spatial embeddedness and planarity of urban road networks limit the range of their node degree values. Therefore, pursuing analysis based on the distribution of node degrees e.g. scale free aspect could not be accomplished in urban road networks. We have inspected the distribution of degree, betweenness centrality, weighted degree (based on incident link capacities), and alpha weighted degree for eight urban road networks across the world. These networks are abstracted from Philadelphia (USA), Berlin (Germany), Chicago (USA), Anaheim (USA), Gold Coast (Australia), Birmingham (UK), and Isfahan (Iran). Our results show that although the degree (weighted and unweighted) distributions of these networks are totally different, they all show power law distributions in betweenness centrality. Thus, scale free aspect could be observed in the betweenness centrality distribution. We then analyzed the collapse of network as a result of node removals. The collapse patterns suggest that critical nodes of urban road networks could not be detected solely based on betweenness centrality. Therefore, we conclude that the concept of betweenness centrality in urban road networks is more of functional merit than topological merit. In other words, central nodes play an important role in transmitting the flow but their loss would not harm the connectivity of urban networks. This claim is supported by analyzing the correlation among node flow and node betweenness in Isfahan and Anaheim.
topic Urban road networks
Centrality
Power law
Vulnerability
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41109-018-0060-9
work_keys_str_mv AT meisamakbarzadeh wheretolookforpowerlawsinurbanroadnetworks
AT soroushmemarmontazerin wheretolookforpowerlawsinurbanroadnetworks
AT sheidasoleimani wheretolookforpowerlawsinurbanroadnetworks
_version_ 1725213599257853952