Wage Differentials between Heat-Exposure Risk and No Heat-Exposure Risk Groups

The goal of this study is to investigate the wage differential between groups of workers who are exposed to heat and those who are not. Workers in the heat-exposure risk group are defined as workers who work in conditions that cause them to spend more than 25% of their work hours at high temperature...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Donghyun Kim, Up Lim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2017-06-01
Series:International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/7/685
id doaj-bbe6598b8e7b41d39fe799f23f95023d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bbe6598b8e7b41d39fe799f23f95023d2020-11-24T23:01:55ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health1660-46012017-06-0114768510.3390/ijerph14070685ijerph14070685Wage Differentials between Heat-Exposure Risk and No Heat-Exposure Risk GroupsDonghyun Kim0Up Lim1Korea Environment Institute, 370 Sicheong-daero, Sejong 30147, KoreaDepartment of Urban Planning and Engineering, Yonsei University, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, KoreaThe goal of this study is to investigate the wage differential between groups of workers who are exposed to heat and those who are not. Workers in the heat-exposure risk group are defined as workers who work in conditions that cause them to spend more than 25% of their work hours at high temperatures. To analyze the wage differential, the Blinder-Oaxaca and Juhn-Murphy-Pierce methods were applied to Korea Working Condition Survey data. The results show that the no heat-exposure risk group received higher wages. In most cases, this can be interpreted as the endowment effect of human capital. As a price effect that lowers the endowment effect, the compensating differential for the heat-exposure risk group was found to be 1%. Moreover, education level, work experience, and employment status counteracted the compensating differentials for heat-exposure risks. A comparison of data sets from 2011 and 2014 shows that the increasing wage gap between the two groups was not caused by systematic social discrimination factors. This study suggests that wage differential factors can be modified for thermal environmental risks that will change working conditions as the impact of climate change increases.http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/7/685wage differentialheat-exposure riskBlinder-Oaxaca methodJuhn-Murphy-Pierce method
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Donghyun Kim
Up Lim
spellingShingle Donghyun Kim
Up Lim
Wage Differentials between Heat-Exposure Risk and No Heat-Exposure Risk Groups
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
wage differential
heat-exposure risk
Blinder-Oaxaca method
Juhn-Murphy-Pierce method
author_facet Donghyun Kim
Up Lim
author_sort Donghyun Kim
title Wage Differentials between Heat-Exposure Risk and No Heat-Exposure Risk Groups
title_short Wage Differentials between Heat-Exposure Risk and No Heat-Exposure Risk Groups
title_full Wage Differentials between Heat-Exposure Risk and No Heat-Exposure Risk Groups
title_fullStr Wage Differentials between Heat-Exposure Risk and No Heat-Exposure Risk Groups
title_full_unstemmed Wage Differentials between Heat-Exposure Risk and No Heat-Exposure Risk Groups
title_sort wage differentials between heat-exposure risk and no heat-exposure risk groups
publisher MDPI AG
series International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
issn 1660-4601
publishDate 2017-06-01
description The goal of this study is to investigate the wage differential between groups of workers who are exposed to heat and those who are not. Workers in the heat-exposure risk group are defined as workers who work in conditions that cause them to spend more than 25% of their work hours at high temperatures. To analyze the wage differential, the Blinder-Oaxaca and Juhn-Murphy-Pierce methods were applied to Korea Working Condition Survey data. The results show that the no heat-exposure risk group received higher wages. In most cases, this can be interpreted as the endowment effect of human capital. As a price effect that lowers the endowment effect, the compensating differential for the heat-exposure risk group was found to be 1%. Moreover, education level, work experience, and employment status counteracted the compensating differentials for heat-exposure risks. A comparison of data sets from 2011 and 2014 shows that the increasing wage gap between the two groups was not caused by systematic social discrimination factors. This study suggests that wage differential factors can be modified for thermal environmental risks that will change working conditions as the impact of climate change increases.
topic wage differential
heat-exposure risk
Blinder-Oaxaca method
Juhn-Murphy-Pierce method
url http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/7/685
work_keys_str_mv AT donghyunkim wagedifferentialsbetweenheatexposureriskandnoheatexposureriskgroups
AT uplim wagedifferentialsbetweenheatexposureriskandnoheatexposureriskgroups
_version_ 1725638412842565632