Retrocaval Ureter: Report of Two Cases

Retrocaval ureter (RCU) is a rare congenital anomaly in which the ureter passes posterior to the inferior vena cava (IVC). A little over 200 cases have been reported worldwide since Hochstetter’s first report in 1893. We present two cases of retrocaval ureter which were successfully managed at the C...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Henry Atawurah, Patrick Opoku Manu Maison, Mohammed Owusu-Ansah, Alvin Asante-Asamani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2019-01-01
Series:Case Reports in Urology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2815748
id doaj-bbe47885b949486eba752498f121037a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bbe47885b949486eba752498f121037a2020-11-24T21:42:53ZengHindawi LimitedCase Reports in Urology2090-696X2090-69782019-01-01201910.1155/2019/28157482815748Retrocaval Ureter: Report of Two CasesHenry Atawurah0Patrick Opoku Manu Maison1Mohammed Owusu-Ansah2Alvin Asante-Asamani3Department of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, College of Health and Allied Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, GhanaDepartment of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, College of Health and Allied Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, GhanaDepartment of Radiology, Cape Coast Teaching Hospital, Cape Coast, GhanaDepartment of Surgery, Cape Coast Teaching Hospital, Cape Coast, GhanaRetrocaval ureter (RCU) is a rare congenital anomaly in which the ureter passes posterior to the inferior vena cava (IVC). A little over 200 cases have been reported worldwide since Hochstetter’s first report in 1893. We present two cases of retrocaval ureter which were successfully managed at the Cape Coast Teaching Hospital in Ghana. Case 1. A 55-year-old woman presented with a history of dull right flank pain of 2 years duration. Physical examination and basic laboratory investigations performed on her were normal. Abdominal ultrasound showed right hydronephrosis and a retrograde right ureteropyelogram (RPG) showed right hydroureteronephrosis with an “S” shaped proximal ureter. A diagnosis of retrocaval ureter was made and confirmed at surgery. Case 2. A 25-year-old man presented with dull intermittent right flank pain of 1 year duration. Clinical examination and laboratory investigation were normal. Abdominal ultrasound showed right hydronephrosis and a CT urogram made a diagnosis of retrocaval ureter which was confirmed at surgery. Conclusion. Retrocaval ureter is a rare congenital anomaly that is now increasingly being reported. Surgical treatment of symptomatic cases successfully relieves symptoms.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2815748
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Henry Atawurah
Patrick Opoku Manu Maison
Mohammed Owusu-Ansah
Alvin Asante-Asamani
spellingShingle Henry Atawurah
Patrick Opoku Manu Maison
Mohammed Owusu-Ansah
Alvin Asante-Asamani
Retrocaval Ureter: Report of Two Cases
Case Reports in Urology
author_facet Henry Atawurah
Patrick Opoku Manu Maison
Mohammed Owusu-Ansah
Alvin Asante-Asamani
author_sort Henry Atawurah
title Retrocaval Ureter: Report of Two Cases
title_short Retrocaval Ureter: Report of Two Cases
title_full Retrocaval Ureter: Report of Two Cases
title_fullStr Retrocaval Ureter: Report of Two Cases
title_full_unstemmed Retrocaval Ureter: Report of Two Cases
title_sort retrocaval ureter: report of two cases
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Case Reports in Urology
issn 2090-696X
2090-6978
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Retrocaval ureter (RCU) is a rare congenital anomaly in which the ureter passes posterior to the inferior vena cava (IVC). A little over 200 cases have been reported worldwide since Hochstetter’s first report in 1893. We present two cases of retrocaval ureter which were successfully managed at the Cape Coast Teaching Hospital in Ghana. Case 1. A 55-year-old woman presented with a history of dull right flank pain of 2 years duration. Physical examination and basic laboratory investigations performed on her were normal. Abdominal ultrasound showed right hydronephrosis and a retrograde right ureteropyelogram (RPG) showed right hydroureteronephrosis with an “S” shaped proximal ureter. A diagnosis of retrocaval ureter was made and confirmed at surgery. Case 2. A 25-year-old man presented with dull intermittent right flank pain of 1 year duration. Clinical examination and laboratory investigation were normal. Abdominal ultrasound showed right hydronephrosis and a CT urogram made a diagnosis of retrocaval ureter which was confirmed at surgery. Conclusion. Retrocaval ureter is a rare congenital anomaly that is now increasingly being reported. Surgical treatment of symptomatic cases successfully relieves symptoms.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2815748
work_keys_str_mv AT henryatawurah retrocavalureterreportoftwocases
AT patrickopokumanumaison retrocavalureterreportoftwocases
AT mohammedowusuansah retrocavalureterreportoftwocases
AT alvinasanteasamani retrocavalureterreportoftwocases
_version_ 1725916578694823936