Systematic adaptation of the Thai version of the supportive and palliative care indicators tool for low-income setting (SPICT-LIS)

Abstract Background Identification of patients who might benefit from palliative care among countries with different socioeconomic and medical contexts is challenging. The Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool for a Low-income Setting (SPICT-LIS) was designed to help physicians identify pat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Supakorn Sripaew, Orapan Fumaneeshoat, Thammasin Ingviya
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-02-01
Series:BMC Palliative Care
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-021-00729-y
id doaj-bbe23932142a4c62bb9639350d2453cb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bbe23932142a4c62bb9639350d2453cb2021-02-21T12:26:37ZengBMCBMC Palliative Care1472-684X2021-02-012011910.1186/s12904-021-00729-ySystematic adaptation of the Thai version of the supportive and palliative care indicators tool for low-income setting (SPICT-LIS)Supakorn Sripaew0Orapan Fumaneeshoat1Thammasin Ingviya2Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Faculty of MedicineDepartment of Family and Preventive Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Faculty of MedicineDepartment of Family and Preventive Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Faculty of MedicineAbstract Background Identification of patients who might benefit from palliative care among countries with different socioeconomic and medical contexts is challenging. The Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool for a Low-income Setting (SPICT-LIS) was designed to help physicians identify patients in low-income setting who might benefit from palliative care. We aimed to systematically adapt and refine the SPICT-LIS for Thai general palliative care providers. Methods We followed the WHO guidelines for translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of an instrument for the SPICT-LIS. Three expert panel members did the initial adaptation using forward and backward translations with pretested data. Two iterations of pretesting were conducted to test for applicability and reliability. The case vignettes which were used in the pretesting were modified hospital medical records. The pretesting was done with 30 respondents from various specialties in a community health center and 34 general palliative care providers from a regional referral hospital in the first and second iterations, respectively. To examine instrument reliability, interrater reliability and internal consistency were evaluated. Cognitive interviewing was conducted using semi-structured interviews with general practitioners (GPs) using the “think aloud strategy” and “probing questions”. Results The adapted Thai SPICT-LIS had a total of 34 indicators which included 6 general and 28 clinical indicators. The assessment of the adapted Thai SPICT-LIS found that it provided consistent responses with good agreement among the GPs, with a Fleiss kappa coefficient of 0.93 (0.76–1.00). The administration time was 2.3–4.3 min per case. Most respondents were female. The 8 interviewed GPs said they felt that the SPICT-LIS was appropriate for use in a general setting in Thailand. Conclusion The study found that the Thai SPICT-LIS could be an applicable, acceptable, and reliable tool for general palliative care providers in Thailand to identify patients who might benefit from palliative care.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-021-00729-y
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Supakorn Sripaew
Orapan Fumaneeshoat
Thammasin Ingviya
spellingShingle Supakorn Sripaew
Orapan Fumaneeshoat
Thammasin Ingviya
Systematic adaptation of the Thai version of the supportive and palliative care indicators tool for low-income setting (SPICT-LIS)
BMC Palliative Care
author_facet Supakorn Sripaew
Orapan Fumaneeshoat
Thammasin Ingviya
author_sort Supakorn Sripaew
title Systematic adaptation of the Thai version of the supportive and palliative care indicators tool for low-income setting (SPICT-LIS)
title_short Systematic adaptation of the Thai version of the supportive and palliative care indicators tool for low-income setting (SPICT-LIS)
title_full Systematic adaptation of the Thai version of the supportive and palliative care indicators tool for low-income setting (SPICT-LIS)
title_fullStr Systematic adaptation of the Thai version of the supportive and palliative care indicators tool for low-income setting (SPICT-LIS)
title_full_unstemmed Systematic adaptation of the Thai version of the supportive and palliative care indicators tool for low-income setting (SPICT-LIS)
title_sort systematic adaptation of the thai version of the supportive and palliative care indicators tool for low-income setting (spict-lis)
publisher BMC
series BMC Palliative Care
issn 1472-684X
publishDate 2021-02-01
description Abstract Background Identification of patients who might benefit from palliative care among countries with different socioeconomic and medical contexts is challenging. The Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool for a Low-income Setting (SPICT-LIS) was designed to help physicians identify patients in low-income setting who might benefit from palliative care. We aimed to systematically adapt and refine the SPICT-LIS for Thai general palliative care providers. Methods We followed the WHO guidelines for translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of an instrument for the SPICT-LIS. Three expert panel members did the initial adaptation using forward and backward translations with pretested data. Two iterations of pretesting were conducted to test for applicability and reliability. The case vignettes which were used in the pretesting were modified hospital medical records. The pretesting was done with 30 respondents from various specialties in a community health center and 34 general palliative care providers from a regional referral hospital in the first and second iterations, respectively. To examine instrument reliability, interrater reliability and internal consistency were evaluated. Cognitive interviewing was conducted using semi-structured interviews with general practitioners (GPs) using the “think aloud strategy” and “probing questions”. Results The adapted Thai SPICT-LIS had a total of 34 indicators which included 6 general and 28 clinical indicators. The assessment of the adapted Thai SPICT-LIS found that it provided consistent responses with good agreement among the GPs, with a Fleiss kappa coefficient of 0.93 (0.76–1.00). The administration time was 2.3–4.3 min per case. Most respondents were female. The 8 interviewed GPs said they felt that the SPICT-LIS was appropriate for use in a general setting in Thailand. Conclusion The study found that the Thai SPICT-LIS could be an applicable, acceptable, and reliable tool for general palliative care providers in Thailand to identify patients who might benefit from palliative care.
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-021-00729-y
work_keys_str_mv AT supakornsripaew systematicadaptationofthethaiversionofthesupportiveandpalliativecareindicatorstoolforlowincomesettingspictlis
AT orapanfumaneeshoat systematicadaptationofthethaiversionofthesupportiveandpalliativecareindicatorstoolforlowincomesettingspictlis
AT thammasiningviya systematicadaptationofthethaiversionofthesupportiveandpalliativecareindicatorstoolforlowincomesettingspictlis
_version_ 1724258075805745152