A preliminary analysis of California’s New Local Control Funding Formula

California recently overhauled its K–12 public education finance system. Enacted in 2013, the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) replaced California’s 40-year-old funding formula. The LCFF increases district officials’ fiscal flexibility; provides more resources to districts serving larger proport...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rebecca Wolf, Janelle Sands
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Arizona State University 2016-03-01
Series:Education Policy Analysis Archives
Subjects:
Online Access:https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/2194
id doaj-bbc86fa5d01a405c8a7cac2ca8b91d1d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bbc86fa5d01a405c8a7cac2ca8b91d1d2020-11-25T03:30:21ZengArizona State UniversityEducation Policy Analysis Archives1068-23412016-03-0124010.14507/epaa.24.21941478A preliminary analysis of California’s New Local Control Funding FormulaRebecca Wolf0Janelle Sands1SRI InternationalSRI InternationalCalifornia recently overhauled its K–12 public education finance system. Enacted in 2013, the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) replaced California’s 40-year-old funding formula. The LCFF increases district officials’ fiscal flexibility; provides more resources to districts serving larger proportions of low-income, English learner (EL), and foster youth students; and requires district officials to engage community members in district decisions. This article expands on a study conducted by a team of 12 independent researchers that investigated the early implementation of the LCFF. The study sought to answer three research questions: (a) how are district officials using their newfound budget flexibility? (b) how are district officials engaging parents and other stakeholders? (c) what are the opportunities provided to districts under the LCFF and the challenges it creates for them? Data include 71 semi-structured interviews with district stakeholders across 10 diverse districts in California and 22 interviews with county office of education (COE) officials across the state. Findings include that respondents were cautiously optimistic about the LCFF. District officials appreciated increased budget flexibility and the focus on community engagement. Inevitably, however, district and COE officials experienced challenges in implementing the law during its first year.https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/2194Local control funding formulaLCFFlocal control accountability planCaliforniaschool financeequityadequacyfiscal flexibilitylocal controlcommunity engagementstate reform
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rebecca Wolf
Janelle Sands
spellingShingle Rebecca Wolf
Janelle Sands
A preliminary analysis of California’s New Local Control Funding Formula
Education Policy Analysis Archives
Local control funding formula
LCFF
local control accountability plan
California
school finance
equity
adequacy
fiscal flexibility
local control
community engagement
state reform
author_facet Rebecca Wolf
Janelle Sands
author_sort Rebecca Wolf
title A preliminary analysis of California’s New Local Control Funding Formula
title_short A preliminary analysis of California’s New Local Control Funding Formula
title_full A preliminary analysis of California’s New Local Control Funding Formula
title_fullStr A preliminary analysis of California’s New Local Control Funding Formula
title_full_unstemmed A preliminary analysis of California’s New Local Control Funding Formula
title_sort preliminary analysis of california’s new local control funding formula
publisher Arizona State University
series Education Policy Analysis Archives
issn 1068-2341
publishDate 2016-03-01
description California recently overhauled its K–12 public education finance system. Enacted in 2013, the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) replaced California’s 40-year-old funding formula. The LCFF increases district officials’ fiscal flexibility; provides more resources to districts serving larger proportions of low-income, English learner (EL), and foster youth students; and requires district officials to engage community members in district decisions. This article expands on a study conducted by a team of 12 independent researchers that investigated the early implementation of the LCFF. The study sought to answer three research questions: (a) how are district officials using their newfound budget flexibility? (b) how are district officials engaging parents and other stakeholders? (c) what are the opportunities provided to districts under the LCFF and the challenges it creates for them? Data include 71 semi-structured interviews with district stakeholders across 10 diverse districts in California and 22 interviews with county office of education (COE) officials across the state. Findings include that respondents were cautiously optimistic about the LCFF. District officials appreciated increased budget flexibility and the focus on community engagement. Inevitably, however, district and COE officials experienced challenges in implementing the law during its first year.
topic Local control funding formula
LCFF
local control accountability plan
California
school finance
equity
adequacy
fiscal flexibility
local control
community engagement
state reform
url https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/2194
work_keys_str_mv AT rebeccawolf apreliminaryanalysisofcaliforniasnewlocalcontrolfundingformula
AT janellesands apreliminaryanalysisofcaliforniasnewlocalcontrolfundingformula
AT rebeccawolf preliminaryanalysisofcaliforniasnewlocalcontrolfundingformula
AT janellesands preliminaryanalysisofcaliforniasnewlocalcontrolfundingformula
_version_ 1724576015136587776