A sparse grid approach to balance sheet risk measurement

In this work, we present a numerical method based on a sparse grid approximation to compute the loss distribution of the balance sheet of a financial or an insurance company. We first describe, in a stylised way, the assets and liabilities dynamics that are used for the numerical estimation of the b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bénézet Cyril, Bonnefoy Jérémie, Chassagneux Jean-François, Deng Shuoqing, Garcia Trillos Camilo, Lenôtre Lionel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2019-01-01
Series:ESAIM: Proceedings and Surveys
Online Access:https://www.esaim-proc.org/articles/proc/pdf/2019/01/proc196510.pdf
id doaj-bb860cda184f4f7fadb0132409c0c0bb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bb860cda184f4f7fadb0132409c0c0bb2021-07-15T14:18:13ZengEDP SciencesESAIM: Proceedings and Surveys2267-30592019-01-016523626510.1051/proc/201965236proc196510A sparse grid approach to balance sheet risk measurementBénézet CyrilBonnefoy JérémieChassagneux Jean-FrançoisDeng ShuoqingGarcia Trillos CamiloLenôtre LionelIn this work, we present a numerical method based on a sparse grid approximation to compute the loss distribution of the balance sheet of a financial or an insurance company. We first describe, in a stylised way, the assets and liabilities dynamics that are used for the numerical estimation of the balance sheet distribution. For the pricing and hedging model, we chose a classical Black & choles model with a stochastic interest rate following a Hull & White model. The risk management model describing the evolution of the parameters of the pricing and hedging model is a Gaussian model. The new numerical method is compared with the traditional nested simulation approach. We review the convergence of both methods to estimate the risk indicators under consideration. Finally, we provide numerical results showing that the sparse grid approach is extremely competitive for models with moderate dimension.https://www.esaim-proc.org/articles/proc/pdf/2019/01/proc196510.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bénézet Cyril
Bonnefoy Jérémie
Chassagneux Jean-François
Deng Shuoqing
Garcia Trillos Camilo
Lenôtre Lionel
spellingShingle Bénézet Cyril
Bonnefoy Jérémie
Chassagneux Jean-François
Deng Shuoqing
Garcia Trillos Camilo
Lenôtre Lionel
A sparse grid approach to balance sheet risk measurement
ESAIM: Proceedings and Surveys
author_facet Bénézet Cyril
Bonnefoy Jérémie
Chassagneux Jean-François
Deng Shuoqing
Garcia Trillos Camilo
Lenôtre Lionel
author_sort Bénézet Cyril
title A sparse grid approach to balance sheet risk measurement
title_short A sparse grid approach to balance sheet risk measurement
title_full A sparse grid approach to balance sheet risk measurement
title_fullStr A sparse grid approach to balance sheet risk measurement
title_full_unstemmed A sparse grid approach to balance sheet risk measurement
title_sort sparse grid approach to balance sheet risk measurement
publisher EDP Sciences
series ESAIM: Proceedings and Surveys
issn 2267-3059
publishDate 2019-01-01
description In this work, we present a numerical method based on a sparse grid approximation to compute the loss distribution of the balance sheet of a financial or an insurance company. We first describe, in a stylised way, the assets and liabilities dynamics that are used for the numerical estimation of the balance sheet distribution. For the pricing and hedging model, we chose a classical Black & choles model with a stochastic interest rate following a Hull & White model. The risk management model describing the evolution of the parameters of the pricing and hedging model is a Gaussian model. The new numerical method is compared with the traditional nested simulation approach. We review the convergence of both methods to estimate the risk indicators under consideration. Finally, we provide numerical results showing that the sparse grid approach is extremely competitive for models with moderate dimension.
url https://www.esaim-proc.org/articles/proc/pdf/2019/01/proc196510.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT benezetcyril asparsegridapproachtobalancesheetriskmeasurement
AT bonnefoyjeremie asparsegridapproachtobalancesheetriskmeasurement
AT chassagneuxjeanfrancois asparsegridapproachtobalancesheetriskmeasurement
AT dengshuoqing asparsegridapproachtobalancesheetriskmeasurement
AT garciatrilloscamilo asparsegridapproachtobalancesheetriskmeasurement
AT lenotrelionel asparsegridapproachtobalancesheetriskmeasurement
AT benezetcyril sparsegridapproachtobalancesheetriskmeasurement
AT bonnefoyjeremie sparsegridapproachtobalancesheetriskmeasurement
AT chassagneuxjeanfrancois sparsegridapproachtobalancesheetriskmeasurement
AT dengshuoqing sparsegridapproachtobalancesheetriskmeasurement
AT garciatrilloscamilo sparsegridapproachtobalancesheetriskmeasurement
AT lenotrelionel sparsegridapproachtobalancesheetriskmeasurement
_version_ 1721300173271859200