A sparse grid approach to balance sheet risk measurement
In this work, we present a numerical method based on a sparse grid approximation to compute the loss distribution of the balance sheet of a financial or an insurance company. We first describe, in a stylised way, the assets and liabilities dynamics that are used for the numerical estimation of the b...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
EDP Sciences
2019-01-01
|
Series: | ESAIM: Proceedings and Surveys |
Online Access: | https://www.esaim-proc.org/articles/proc/pdf/2019/01/proc196510.pdf |
id |
doaj-bb860cda184f4f7fadb0132409c0c0bb |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-bb860cda184f4f7fadb0132409c0c0bb2021-07-15T14:18:13ZengEDP SciencesESAIM: Proceedings and Surveys2267-30592019-01-016523626510.1051/proc/201965236proc196510A sparse grid approach to balance sheet risk measurementBénézet CyrilBonnefoy JérémieChassagneux Jean-FrançoisDeng ShuoqingGarcia Trillos CamiloLenôtre LionelIn this work, we present a numerical method based on a sparse grid approximation to compute the loss distribution of the balance sheet of a financial or an insurance company. We first describe, in a stylised way, the assets and liabilities dynamics that are used for the numerical estimation of the balance sheet distribution. For the pricing and hedging model, we chose a classical Black & choles model with a stochastic interest rate following a Hull & White model. The risk management model describing the evolution of the parameters of the pricing and hedging model is a Gaussian model. The new numerical method is compared with the traditional nested simulation approach. We review the convergence of both methods to estimate the risk indicators under consideration. Finally, we provide numerical results showing that the sparse grid approach is extremely competitive for models with moderate dimension.https://www.esaim-proc.org/articles/proc/pdf/2019/01/proc196510.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Bénézet Cyril Bonnefoy Jérémie Chassagneux Jean-François Deng Shuoqing Garcia Trillos Camilo Lenôtre Lionel |
spellingShingle |
Bénézet Cyril Bonnefoy Jérémie Chassagneux Jean-François Deng Shuoqing Garcia Trillos Camilo Lenôtre Lionel A sparse grid approach to balance sheet risk measurement ESAIM: Proceedings and Surveys |
author_facet |
Bénézet Cyril Bonnefoy Jérémie Chassagneux Jean-François Deng Shuoqing Garcia Trillos Camilo Lenôtre Lionel |
author_sort |
Bénézet Cyril |
title |
A sparse grid approach to balance sheet risk measurement |
title_short |
A sparse grid approach to balance sheet risk measurement |
title_full |
A sparse grid approach to balance sheet risk measurement |
title_fullStr |
A sparse grid approach to balance sheet risk measurement |
title_full_unstemmed |
A sparse grid approach to balance sheet risk measurement |
title_sort |
sparse grid approach to balance sheet risk measurement |
publisher |
EDP Sciences |
series |
ESAIM: Proceedings and Surveys |
issn |
2267-3059 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
In this work, we present a numerical method based on a sparse grid approximation to compute the loss distribution of the balance sheet of a financial or an insurance company. We first describe, in a stylised way, the assets and liabilities dynamics that are used for the numerical estimation of the balance sheet distribution. For the pricing and hedging model, we chose a classical Black & choles model with a stochastic interest rate following a Hull & White model. The risk management model describing the evolution of the parameters of the pricing and hedging model is a Gaussian model. The new numerical method is compared with the traditional nested simulation approach. We review the convergence of both methods to estimate the risk indicators under consideration. Finally, we provide numerical results showing that the sparse grid approach is extremely competitive for models with moderate dimension. |
url |
https://www.esaim-proc.org/articles/proc/pdf/2019/01/proc196510.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT benezetcyril asparsegridapproachtobalancesheetriskmeasurement AT bonnefoyjeremie asparsegridapproachtobalancesheetriskmeasurement AT chassagneuxjeanfrancois asparsegridapproachtobalancesheetriskmeasurement AT dengshuoqing asparsegridapproachtobalancesheetriskmeasurement AT garciatrilloscamilo asparsegridapproachtobalancesheetriskmeasurement AT lenotrelionel asparsegridapproachtobalancesheetriskmeasurement AT benezetcyril sparsegridapproachtobalancesheetriskmeasurement AT bonnefoyjeremie sparsegridapproachtobalancesheetriskmeasurement AT chassagneuxjeanfrancois sparsegridapproachtobalancesheetriskmeasurement AT dengshuoqing sparsegridapproachtobalancesheetriskmeasurement AT garciatrilloscamilo sparsegridapproachtobalancesheetriskmeasurement AT lenotrelionel sparsegridapproachtobalancesheetriskmeasurement |
_version_ |
1721300173271859200 |