Comparison between optical coherence tomography angiography and immunolabeling for evaluation of laser-induced choroidal neovascularization.
This study aimed to investigate the differences between images obtained by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) with those from immunohistochemical labeling of laser-induced choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in a mouse model. CNV was induced by laser photocoagulation (GYC-2000, NIDEK; wa...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2018-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6084993?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-bb7b9a1a9cad4267b868a903def3e2c8 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-bb7b9a1a9cad4267b868a903def3e2c82020-11-25T00:42:42ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01138e020195810.1371/journal.pone.0201958Comparison between optical coherence tomography angiography and immunolabeling for evaluation of laser-induced choroidal neovascularization.Kazuki NakagawaHaruhiko YamadaHidetsugu MoriKeiko ToyamaKanji TakahashiThis study aimed to investigate the differences between images obtained by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) with those from immunohistochemical labeling of laser-induced choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in a mouse model. CNV was induced by laser photocoagulation (GYC-2000, NIDEK; wavelength 532 nm) in the left eyes of 10 female C57BL/6J mice aged 6 weeks. The laser parameters included a 100-μm spot, 100-ms pulse duration and 200-mW incident power to rupture Bruch's membrane. OCT and OCTA CNV images were obtained using the RS-3000 Advance (NIDEK) 5 days post-laser photocoagulation. After OCTA imaging, the isolated choroid/retinal pigment epithelium complexes were fluorescently labeled with CD31 (an endothelial cell marker), platelet-derived growth factor receptor β (PDGFRβ, a pericyte-like scaffold marker), α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) and collagen I. Area measurements of the lesions obtained by enface OCTA were compared with immunolabeled CD31+ CNV lesions in choroid flat-mounts. We also examined structural correlations between the PDGFRβ+ pericyte-like scaffold and OCTA images. Laser-induced CNV was clearly detected by enface OCTA, appearing as a hyperflow lesion surrounded by a dark halo. Area measurements of the CNV lesion by immunolabeling were significantly larger than those obtained by enface OCTA (p = 0.006). The CNV lesion beneath the periphery of the pericyte-like scaffold was not clearly visible by enface OCTA due to the dark halo; however, the lesion was detectable as blood flow by cross-sectional OCTA and was also highly labeled by CD31. The periphery of the pericyte-like scaffold appeared to develop into subretinal fibrosis and this region was rich in myofibroblasts. Enface OCTA was unable to detect the entire area of laser-induced CNV in mice, with an undetectable portion located beneath the fibrotic periphery of the pericyte-like scaffold. Due to this OCTA fibrosis artifact, OCTA imaging has limited potential for accurately estimating CNV lesions.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6084993?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kazuki Nakagawa Haruhiko Yamada Hidetsugu Mori Keiko Toyama Kanji Takahashi |
spellingShingle |
Kazuki Nakagawa Haruhiko Yamada Hidetsugu Mori Keiko Toyama Kanji Takahashi Comparison between optical coherence tomography angiography and immunolabeling for evaluation of laser-induced choroidal neovascularization. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Kazuki Nakagawa Haruhiko Yamada Hidetsugu Mori Keiko Toyama Kanji Takahashi |
author_sort |
Kazuki Nakagawa |
title |
Comparison between optical coherence tomography angiography and immunolabeling for evaluation of laser-induced choroidal neovascularization. |
title_short |
Comparison between optical coherence tomography angiography and immunolabeling for evaluation of laser-induced choroidal neovascularization. |
title_full |
Comparison between optical coherence tomography angiography and immunolabeling for evaluation of laser-induced choroidal neovascularization. |
title_fullStr |
Comparison between optical coherence tomography angiography and immunolabeling for evaluation of laser-induced choroidal neovascularization. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison between optical coherence tomography angiography and immunolabeling for evaluation of laser-induced choroidal neovascularization. |
title_sort |
comparison between optical coherence tomography angiography and immunolabeling for evaluation of laser-induced choroidal neovascularization. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
This study aimed to investigate the differences between images obtained by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) with those from immunohistochemical labeling of laser-induced choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in a mouse model. CNV was induced by laser photocoagulation (GYC-2000, NIDEK; wavelength 532 nm) in the left eyes of 10 female C57BL/6J mice aged 6 weeks. The laser parameters included a 100-μm spot, 100-ms pulse duration and 200-mW incident power to rupture Bruch's membrane. OCT and OCTA CNV images were obtained using the RS-3000 Advance (NIDEK) 5 days post-laser photocoagulation. After OCTA imaging, the isolated choroid/retinal pigment epithelium complexes were fluorescently labeled with CD31 (an endothelial cell marker), platelet-derived growth factor receptor β (PDGFRβ, a pericyte-like scaffold marker), α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) and collagen I. Area measurements of the lesions obtained by enface OCTA were compared with immunolabeled CD31+ CNV lesions in choroid flat-mounts. We also examined structural correlations between the PDGFRβ+ pericyte-like scaffold and OCTA images. Laser-induced CNV was clearly detected by enface OCTA, appearing as a hyperflow lesion surrounded by a dark halo. Area measurements of the CNV lesion by immunolabeling were significantly larger than those obtained by enface OCTA (p = 0.006). The CNV lesion beneath the periphery of the pericyte-like scaffold was not clearly visible by enface OCTA due to the dark halo; however, the lesion was detectable as blood flow by cross-sectional OCTA and was also highly labeled by CD31. The periphery of the pericyte-like scaffold appeared to develop into subretinal fibrosis and this region was rich in myofibroblasts. Enface OCTA was unable to detect the entire area of laser-induced CNV in mice, with an undetectable portion located beneath the fibrotic periphery of the pericyte-like scaffold. Due to this OCTA fibrosis artifact, OCTA imaging has limited potential for accurately estimating CNV lesions. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6084993?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kazukinakagawa comparisonbetweenopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyandimmunolabelingforevaluationoflaserinducedchoroidalneovascularization AT haruhikoyamada comparisonbetweenopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyandimmunolabelingforevaluationoflaserinducedchoroidalneovascularization AT hidetsugumori comparisonbetweenopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyandimmunolabelingforevaluationoflaserinducedchoroidalneovascularization AT keikotoyama comparisonbetweenopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyandimmunolabelingforevaluationoflaserinducedchoroidalneovascularization AT kanjitakahashi comparisonbetweenopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyandimmunolabelingforevaluationoflaserinducedchoroidalneovascularization |
_version_ |
1725280893233266688 |