Comparison between optical coherence tomography angiography and immunolabeling for evaluation of laser-induced choroidal neovascularization.

This study aimed to investigate the differences between images obtained by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) with those from immunohistochemical labeling of laser-induced choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in a mouse model. CNV was induced by laser photocoagulation (GYC-2000, NIDEK; wa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kazuki Nakagawa, Haruhiko Yamada, Hidetsugu Mori, Keiko Toyama, Kanji Takahashi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6084993?pdf=render
id doaj-bb7b9a1a9cad4267b868a903def3e2c8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bb7b9a1a9cad4267b868a903def3e2c82020-11-25T00:42:42ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01138e020195810.1371/journal.pone.0201958Comparison between optical coherence tomography angiography and immunolabeling for evaluation of laser-induced choroidal neovascularization.Kazuki NakagawaHaruhiko YamadaHidetsugu MoriKeiko ToyamaKanji TakahashiThis study aimed to investigate the differences between images obtained by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) with those from immunohistochemical labeling of laser-induced choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in a mouse model. CNV was induced by laser photocoagulation (GYC-2000, NIDEK; wavelength 532 nm) in the left eyes of 10 female C57BL/6J mice aged 6 weeks. The laser parameters included a 100-μm spot, 100-ms pulse duration and 200-mW incident power to rupture Bruch's membrane. OCT and OCTA CNV images were obtained using the RS-3000 Advance (NIDEK) 5 days post-laser photocoagulation. After OCTA imaging, the isolated choroid/retinal pigment epithelium complexes were fluorescently labeled with CD31 (an endothelial cell marker), platelet-derived growth factor receptor β (PDGFRβ, a pericyte-like scaffold marker), α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) and collagen I. Area measurements of the lesions obtained by enface OCTA were compared with immunolabeled CD31+ CNV lesions in choroid flat-mounts. We also examined structural correlations between the PDGFRβ+ pericyte-like scaffold and OCTA images. Laser-induced CNV was clearly detected by enface OCTA, appearing as a hyperflow lesion surrounded by a dark halo. Area measurements of the CNV lesion by immunolabeling were significantly larger than those obtained by enface OCTA (p = 0.006). The CNV lesion beneath the periphery of the pericyte-like scaffold was not clearly visible by enface OCTA due to the dark halo; however, the lesion was detectable as blood flow by cross-sectional OCTA and was also highly labeled by CD31. The periphery of the pericyte-like scaffold appeared to develop into subretinal fibrosis and this region was rich in myofibroblasts. Enface OCTA was unable to detect the entire area of laser-induced CNV in mice, with an undetectable portion located beneath the fibrotic periphery of the pericyte-like scaffold. Due to this OCTA fibrosis artifact, OCTA imaging has limited potential for accurately estimating CNV lesions.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6084993?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kazuki Nakagawa
Haruhiko Yamada
Hidetsugu Mori
Keiko Toyama
Kanji Takahashi
spellingShingle Kazuki Nakagawa
Haruhiko Yamada
Hidetsugu Mori
Keiko Toyama
Kanji Takahashi
Comparison between optical coherence tomography angiography and immunolabeling for evaluation of laser-induced choroidal neovascularization.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Kazuki Nakagawa
Haruhiko Yamada
Hidetsugu Mori
Keiko Toyama
Kanji Takahashi
author_sort Kazuki Nakagawa
title Comparison between optical coherence tomography angiography and immunolabeling for evaluation of laser-induced choroidal neovascularization.
title_short Comparison between optical coherence tomography angiography and immunolabeling for evaluation of laser-induced choroidal neovascularization.
title_full Comparison between optical coherence tomography angiography and immunolabeling for evaluation of laser-induced choroidal neovascularization.
title_fullStr Comparison between optical coherence tomography angiography and immunolabeling for evaluation of laser-induced choroidal neovascularization.
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between optical coherence tomography angiography and immunolabeling for evaluation of laser-induced choroidal neovascularization.
title_sort comparison between optical coherence tomography angiography and immunolabeling for evaluation of laser-induced choroidal neovascularization.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2018-01-01
description This study aimed to investigate the differences between images obtained by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) with those from immunohistochemical labeling of laser-induced choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in a mouse model. CNV was induced by laser photocoagulation (GYC-2000, NIDEK; wavelength 532 nm) in the left eyes of 10 female C57BL/6J mice aged 6 weeks. The laser parameters included a 100-μm spot, 100-ms pulse duration and 200-mW incident power to rupture Bruch's membrane. OCT and OCTA CNV images were obtained using the RS-3000 Advance (NIDEK) 5 days post-laser photocoagulation. After OCTA imaging, the isolated choroid/retinal pigment epithelium complexes were fluorescently labeled with CD31 (an endothelial cell marker), platelet-derived growth factor receptor β (PDGFRβ, a pericyte-like scaffold marker), α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) and collagen I. Area measurements of the lesions obtained by enface OCTA were compared with immunolabeled CD31+ CNV lesions in choroid flat-mounts. We also examined structural correlations between the PDGFRβ+ pericyte-like scaffold and OCTA images. Laser-induced CNV was clearly detected by enface OCTA, appearing as a hyperflow lesion surrounded by a dark halo. Area measurements of the CNV lesion by immunolabeling were significantly larger than those obtained by enface OCTA (p = 0.006). The CNV lesion beneath the periphery of the pericyte-like scaffold was not clearly visible by enface OCTA due to the dark halo; however, the lesion was detectable as blood flow by cross-sectional OCTA and was also highly labeled by CD31. The periphery of the pericyte-like scaffold appeared to develop into subretinal fibrosis and this region was rich in myofibroblasts. Enface OCTA was unable to detect the entire area of laser-induced CNV in mice, with an undetectable portion located beneath the fibrotic periphery of the pericyte-like scaffold. Due to this OCTA fibrosis artifact, OCTA imaging has limited potential for accurately estimating CNV lesions.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6084993?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT kazukinakagawa comparisonbetweenopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyandimmunolabelingforevaluationoflaserinducedchoroidalneovascularization
AT haruhikoyamada comparisonbetweenopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyandimmunolabelingforevaluationoflaserinducedchoroidalneovascularization
AT hidetsugumori comparisonbetweenopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyandimmunolabelingforevaluationoflaserinducedchoroidalneovascularization
AT keikotoyama comparisonbetweenopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyandimmunolabelingforevaluationoflaserinducedchoroidalneovascularization
AT kanjitakahashi comparisonbetweenopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyandimmunolabelingforevaluationoflaserinducedchoroidalneovascularization
_version_ 1725280893233266688