Upward surface movement above deep coal mines after closure and flooding of underground workings

After the mass closures of entire coal mine districts in Europe at the end of the last century, a new phenomenon of surface movement was observed—an upward movement. Although most surface movement (i.e., subsidence) occurs in the months and years after mining by the longwall method, surface movement...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: André Vervoort, Pierre-Yves Declercq
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2018-01-01
Series:International Journal of Mining Science and Technology
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095268617308297
id doaj-bb76cee160cf49a89e5d85f73c018a40
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bb76cee160cf49a89e5d85f73c018a402020-11-25T00:49:00ZengElsevierInternational Journal of Mining Science and Technology2095-26862018-01-012815359Upward surface movement above deep coal mines after closure and flooding of underground workingsAndré Vervoort0Pierre-Yves Declercq1Department of Civil Engineering, KU Leuven, Leuven 3001, Belgium; Corresponding author.Geological Survey of Belgium, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Brussels 1000, BelgiumAfter the mass closures of entire coal mine districts in Europe at the end of the last century, a new phenomenon of surface movement was observed—an upward movement. Although most surface movement (i.e., subsidence) occurs in the months and years after mining by the longwall method, surface movement still occurs many decades after mining is terminated. After the closure and flooding of underground excavations and surrounding rock, this movement was reversed. This paper focuses on quantifying the upward movement in two neighboring coal mines (Winterslag and Zwartberg, Belgium). The study is based on data from a remote sensing technique: interferometry with synthetic aperture radar (INSAR). The results of the study show that the rate of upward movement in the decade after closure is about 10 mm/year on average. The upward movements are not linked directly to the past exploitation directly underneath a location. The amounts of subsidence at specific locations are linked mainly to their positions relative to an inverse trough shape situated over the entire mined-out areas and their immediate surroundings. Local features, such as geological faults, can have a secondary effect on the local variation of the uplift. The processes of subsidence and uplift are based on completely different mechanisms. Subsidence is initiated by a caving process, while the process of uplift is clearly linked to flooding. Keywords: Coal mining, Surface movement, Subsidence, Uplift, Radar-interferometryhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095268617308297
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author André Vervoort
Pierre-Yves Declercq
spellingShingle André Vervoort
Pierre-Yves Declercq
Upward surface movement above deep coal mines after closure and flooding of underground workings
International Journal of Mining Science and Technology
author_facet André Vervoort
Pierre-Yves Declercq
author_sort André Vervoort
title Upward surface movement above deep coal mines after closure and flooding of underground workings
title_short Upward surface movement above deep coal mines after closure and flooding of underground workings
title_full Upward surface movement above deep coal mines after closure and flooding of underground workings
title_fullStr Upward surface movement above deep coal mines after closure and flooding of underground workings
title_full_unstemmed Upward surface movement above deep coal mines after closure and flooding of underground workings
title_sort upward surface movement above deep coal mines after closure and flooding of underground workings
publisher Elsevier
series International Journal of Mining Science and Technology
issn 2095-2686
publishDate 2018-01-01
description After the mass closures of entire coal mine districts in Europe at the end of the last century, a new phenomenon of surface movement was observed—an upward movement. Although most surface movement (i.e., subsidence) occurs in the months and years after mining by the longwall method, surface movement still occurs many decades after mining is terminated. After the closure and flooding of underground excavations and surrounding rock, this movement was reversed. This paper focuses on quantifying the upward movement in two neighboring coal mines (Winterslag and Zwartberg, Belgium). The study is based on data from a remote sensing technique: interferometry with synthetic aperture radar (INSAR). The results of the study show that the rate of upward movement in the decade after closure is about 10 mm/year on average. The upward movements are not linked directly to the past exploitation directly underneath a location. The amounts of subsidence at specific locations are linked mainly to their positions relative to an inverse trough shape situated over the entire mined-out areas and their immediate surroundings. Local features, such as geological faults, can have a secondary effect on the local variation of the uplift. The processes of subsidence and uplift are based on completely different mechanisms. Subsidence is initiated by a caving process, while the process of uplift is clearly linked to flooding. Keywords: Coal mining, Surface movement, Subsidence, Uplift, Radar-interferometry
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095268617308297
work_keys_str_mv AT andrevervoort upwardsurfacemovementabovedeepcoalminesafterclosureandfloodingofundergroundworkings
AT pierreyvesdeclercq upwardsurfacemovementabovedeepcoalminesafterclosureandfloodingofundergroundworkings
_version_ 1725253671197868032