Why are the Pakistani maternal, fetal and newborn outcomes so poor compared to other low and middle-income countries?
Abstract Background Pakistan has among the poorest pregnancy outcomes worldwide, significantly worse than many other low-resource countries. The reasons for these differences are not clear. In this study, we compared pregnancy outcomes in Pakistan to other low-resource countries and explored factors...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-12-01
|
Series: | Reproductive Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-01023-5 |
id |
doaj-bb6d0598740a4f6e83882e3db0a0df0b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Aleha Aziz Sarah Saleem Tracy L. Nolen Nousheen Akber Pradhan Elizabeth M. McClure Saleem Jessani Ana L. Garces Patricia L. Hibberd Janet L. Moore Shivaprasad S. Goudar Sangappa M. Dhaded Fabian Esamai Constance Tenge Archana B. Patel Elwyn Chomba Musaku Mwenechanya Carl L. Bose Edward A. Liechty Nancy F. Krebs Richard J. Derman Waldemar A. Carlo Antoinette Tshefu Marion Koso-Thomas Sameen Siddiqi Robert L. Goldenberg |
spellingShingle |
Aleha Aziz Sarah Saleem Tracy L. Nolen Nousheen Akber Pradhan Elizabeth M. McClure Saleem Jessani Ana L. Garces Patricia L. Hibberd Janet L. Moore Shivaprasad S. Goudar Sangappa M. Dhaded Fabian Esamai Constance Tenge Archana B. Patel Elwyn Chomba Musaku Mwenechanya Carl L. Bose Edward A. Liechty Nancy F. Krebs Richard J. Derman Waldemar A. Carlo Antoinette Tshefu Marion Koso-Thomas Sameen Siddiqi Robert L. Goldenberg Why are the Pakistani maternal, fetal and newborn outcomes so poor compared to other low and middle-income countries? Reproductive Health Pakistan Pregnancy outcomes Maternal mortality Stillbirth Neonatal mortality Risk factors |
author_facet |
Aleha Aziz Sarah Saleem Tracy L. Nolen Nousheen Akber Pradhan Elizabeth M. McClure Saleem Jessani Ana L. Garces Patricia L. Hibberd Janet L. Moore Shivaprasad S. Goudar Sangappa M. Dhaded Fabian Esamai Constance Tenge Archana B. Patel Elwyn Chomba Musaku Mwenechanya Carl L. Bose Edward A. Liechty Nancy F. Krebs Richard J. Derman Waldemar A. Carlo Antoinette Tshefu Marion Koso-Thomas Sameen Siddiqi Robert L. Goldenberg |
author_sort |
Aleha Aziz |
title |
Why are the Pakistani maternal, fetal and newborn outcomes so poor compared to other low and middle-income countries? |
title_short |
Why are the Pakistani maternal, fetal and newborn outcomes so poor compared to other low and middle-income countries? |
title_full |
Why are the Pakistani maternal, fetal and newborn outcomes so poor compared to other low and middle-income countries? |
title_fullStr |
Why are the Pakistani maternal, fetal and newborn outcomes so poor compared to other low and middle-income countries? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Why are the Pakistani maternal, fetal and newborn outcomes so poor compared to other low and middle-income countries? |
title_sort |
why are the pakistani maternal, fetal and newborn outcomes so poor compared to other low and middle-income countries? |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Reproductive Health |
issn |
1742-4755 |
publishDate |
2020-12-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Pakistan has among the poorest pregnancy outcomes worldwide, significantly worse than many other low-resource countries. The reasons for these differences are not clear. In this study, we compared pregnancy outcomes in Pakistan to other low-resource countries and explored factors that might help explain these differences. Methods The Global Network (GN) Maternal Newborn Health Registry (MNHR) is a prospective, population-based observational study that includes all pregnant women and their pregnancy outcomes in defined geographic communities in six low-middle income countries (India, Pakistan, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guatemala, Kenya, Zambia). Study staff enroll women in early pregnancy and follow-up soon after delivery and at 42 days to ascertain delivery, neonatal, and maternal outcomes. We analyzed the maternal mortality ratios (MMR), neonatal mortality rates (NMR), stillbirth rates, and potential explanatory factors from 2010 to 2018 across the GN sites. Results From 2010 to 2018, there were 91,076 births in Pakistan and 456,276 births in the other GN sites combined. The MMR in Pakistan was 319 per 100,000 live births compared to an average of 124 in the other sites, while the Pakistan NMR was 49.4 per 1,000 live births compared to 20.4 in the other sites. The stillbirth rate in Pakistan was 53.5 per 1000 births compared to 23.2 for the other sites. Preterm birth and low birthweight rates were also substantially higher than the other sites combined. Within weight ranges, the Pakistani site generally had significantly higher rates of stillbirth and neonatal mortality than the other sites combined, with differences increasing as birthweights increased. By nearly every measure, medical care for pregnant women and their newborns in the Pakistan sites was worse than at the other sites combined. Conclusion The Pakistani pregnancy outcomes are much worse than those in the other GN sites. Reasons for these poorer outcomes likely include that the Pakistani sites' reproductive-aged women are largely poorly educated, undernourished, anemic, and deliver a high percentage of preterm and low-birthweight babies in settings of often inadequate maternal and newborn care. By addressing the issues highlighted in this paper there appears to be substantial room for improvements in Pakistan’s pregnancy outcomes. |
topic |
Pakistan Pregnancy outcomes Maternal mortality Stillbirth Neonatal mortality Risk factors |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-01023-5 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT alehaaziz whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT sarahsaleem whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT tracylnolen whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT nousheenakberpradhan whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT elizabethmmcclure whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT saleemjessani whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT analgarces whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT patricialhibberd whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT janetlmoore whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT shivaprasadsgoudar whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT sangappamdhaded whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT fabianesamai whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT constancetenge whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT archanabpatel whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT elwynchomba whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT musakumwenechanya whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT carllbose whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT edwardaliechty whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT nancyfkrebs whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT richardjderman whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT waldemaracarlo whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT antoinettetshefu whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT marionkosothomas whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT sameensiddiqi whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries AT robertlgoldenberg whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries |
_version_ |
1724376975653470208 |
spelling |
doaj-bb6d0598740a4f6e83882e3db0a0df0b2020-12-20T12:13:12ZengBMCReproductive Health1742-47552020-12-0117S311210.1186/s12978-020-01023-5Why are the Pakistani maternal, fetal and newborn outcomes so poor compared to other low and middle-income countries?Aleha Aziz0Sarah Saleem1Tracy L. Nolen2Nousheen Akber Pradhan3Elizabeth M. McClure4Saleem Jessani5Ana L. Garces6Patricia L. Hibberd7Janet L. Moore8Shivaprasad S. Goudar9Sangappa M. Dhaded10Fabian Esamai11Constance Tenge12Archana B. Patel13Elwyn Chomba14Musaku Mwenechanya15Carl L. Bose16Edward A. Liechty17Nancy F. Krebs18Richard J. Derman19Waldemar A. Carlo20Antoinette Tshefu21Marion Koso-Thomas22Sameen Siddiqi23Robert L. Goldenberg24Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University School of MedicineAga Khan UniversityRTI InternationalAga Khan UniversityRTI InternationalAga Khan UniversityInstituto de Nutrición de Centroamérica y PanamáSchool of Public Health, Boston UniversityRTI InternationalJ N Medical College, KLE Academy Higher Education and ResearchJ N Medical College, KLE Academy Higher Education and ResearchMoi University School of MedicineMoi University School of MedicineLata Medical Research FoundationUniversity Teaching HospitalUniversity Teaching HospitalUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillIndiana School of Medicine, University of IndianaUniversity of Colorado School of MedicineThomas Jefferson UniversityUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamKinshasa School of Public HealthEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentAga Khan UniversityDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University School of MedicineAbstract Background Pakistan has among the poorest pregnancy outcomes worldwide, significantly worse than many other low-resource countries. The reasons for these differences are not clear. In this study, we compared pregnancy outcomes in Pakistan to other low-resource countries and explored factors that might help explain these differences. Methods The Global Network (GN) Maternal Newborn Health Registry (MNHR) is a prospective, population-based observational study that includes all pregnant women and their pregnancy outcomes in defined geographic communities in six low-middle income countries (India, Pakistan, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guatemala, Kenya, Zambia). Study staff enroll women in early pregnancy and follow-up soon after delivery and at 42 days to ascertain delivery, neonatal, and maternal outcomes. We analyzed the maternal mortality ratios (MMR), neonatal mortality rates (NMR), stillbirth rates, and potential explanatory factors from 2010 to 2018 across the GN sites. Results From 2010 to 2018, there were 91,076 births in Pakistan and 456,276 births in the other GN sites combined. The MMR in Pakistan was 319 per 100,000 live births compared to an average of 124 in the other sites, while the Pakistan NMR was 49.4 per 1,000 live births compared to 20.4 in the other sites. The stillbirth rate in Pakistan was 53.5 per 1000 births compared to 23.2 for the other sites. Preterm birth and low birthweight rates were also substantially higher than the other sites combined. Within weight ranges, the Pakistani site generally had significantly higher rates of stillbirth and neonatal mortality than the other sites combined, with differences increasing as birthweights increased. By nearly every measure, medical care for pregnant women and their newborns in the Pakistan sites was worse than at the other sites combined. Conclusion The Pakistani pregnancy outcomes are much worse than those in the other GN sites. Reasons for these poorer outcomes likely include that the Pakistani sites' reproductive-aged women are largely poorly educated, undernourished, anemic, and deliver a high percentage of preterm and low-birthweight babies in settings of often inadequate maternal and newborn care. By addressing the issues highlighted in this paper there appears to be substantial room for improvements in Pakistan’s pregnancy outcomes.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-01023-5PakistanPregnancy outcomesMaternal mortalityStillbirthNeonatal mortalityRisk factors |