Why are the Pakistani maternal, fetal and newborn outcomes so poor compared to other low and middle-income countries?

Abstract Background Pakistan has among the poorest pregnancy outcomes worldwide, significantly worse than many other low-resource countries. The reasons for these differences are not clear. In this study, we compared pregnancy outcomes in Pakistan to other low-resource countries and explored factors...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aleha Aziz, Sarah Saleem, Tracy L. Nolen, Nousheen Akber Pradhan, Elizabeth M. McClure, Saleem Jessani, Ana L. Garces, Patricia L. Hibberd, Janet L. Moore, Shivaprasad S. Goudar, Sangappa M. Dhaded, Fabian Esamai, Constance Tenge, Archana B. Patel, Elwyn Chomba, Musaku Mwenechanya, Carl L. Bose, Edward A. Liechty, Nancy F. Krebs, Richard J. Derman, Waldemar A. Carlo, Antoinette Tshefu, Marion Koso-Thomas, Sameen Siddiqi, Robert L. Goldenberg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-12-01
Series:Reproductive Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-01023-5
id doaj-bb6d0598740a4f6e83882e3db0a0df0b
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Aleha Aziz
Sarah Saleem
Tracy L. Nolen
Nousheen Akber Pradhan
Elizabeth M. McClure
Saleem Jessani
Ana L. Garces
Patricia L. Hibberd
Janet L. Moore
Shivaprasad S. Goudar
Sangappa M. Dhaded
Fabian Esamai
Constance Tenge
Archana B. Patel
Elwyn Chomba
Musaku Mwenechanya
Carl L. Bose
Edward A. Liechty
Nancy F. Krebs
Richard J. Derman
Waldemar A. Carlo
Antoinette Tshefu
Marion Koso-Thomas
Sameen Siddiqi
Robert L. Goldenberg
spellingShingle Aleha Aziz
Sarah Saleem
Tracy L. Nolen
Nousheen Akber Pradhan
Elizabeth M. McClure
Saleem Jessani
Ana L. Garces
Patricia L. Hibberd
Janet L. Moore
Shivaprasad S. Goudar
Sangappa M. Dhaded
Fabian Esamai
Constance Tenge
Archana B. Patel
Elwyn Chomba
Musaku Mwenechanya
Carl L. Bose
Edward A. Liechty
Nancy F. Krebs
Richard J. Derman
Waldemar A. Carlo
Antoinette Tshefu
Marion Koso-Thomas
Sameen Siddiqi
Robert L. Goldenberg
Why are the Pakistani maternal, fetal and newborn outcomes so poor compared to other low and middle-income countries?
Reproductive Health
Pakistan
Pregnancy outcomes
Maternal mortality
Stillbirth
Neonatal mortality
Risk factors
author_facet Aleha Aziz
Sarah Saleem
Tracy L. Nolen
Nousheen Akber Pradhan
Elizabeth M. McClure
Saleem Jessani
Ana L. Garces
Patricia L. Hibberd
Janet L. Moore
Shivaprasad S. Goudar
Sangappa M. Dhaded
Fabian Esamai
Constance Tenge
Archana B. Patel
Elwyn Chomba
Musaku Mwenechanya
Carl L. Bose
Edward A. Liechty
Nancy F. Krebs
Richard J. Derman
Waldemar A. Carlo
Antoinette Tshefu
Marion Koso-Thomas
Sameen Siddiqi
Robert L. Goldenberg
author_sort Aleha Aziz
title Why are the Pakistani maternal, fetal and newborn outcomes so poor compared to other low and middle-income countries?
title_short Why are the Pakistani maternal, fetal and newborn outcomes so poor compared to other low and middle-income countries?
title_full Why are the Pakistani maternal, fetal and newborn outcomes so poor compared to other low and middle-income countries?
title_fullStr Why are the Pakistani maternal, fetal and newborn outcomes so poor compared to other low and middle-income countries?
title_full_unstemmed Why are the Pakistani maternal, fetal and newborn outcomes so poor compared to other low and middle-income countries?
title_sort why are the pakistani maternal, fetal and newborn outcomes so poor compared to other low and middle-income countries?
publisher BMC
series Reproductive Health
issn 1742-4755
publishDate 2020-12-01
description Abstract Background Pakistan has among the poorest pregnancy outcomes worldwide, significantly worse than many other low-resource countries. The reasons for these differences are not clear. In this study, we compared pregnancy outcomes in Pakistan to other low-resource countries and explored factors that might help explain these differences. Methods The Global Network (GN) Maternal Newborn Health Registry (MNHR) is a prospective, population-based observational study that includes all pregnant women and their pregnancy outcomes in defined geographic communities in six low-middle income countries (India, Pakistan, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guatemala, Kenya, Zambia). Study staff enroll women in early pregnancy and follow-up soon after delivery and at 42 days to ascertain delivery, neonatal, and maternal outcomes. We analyzed the maternal mortality ratios (MMR), neonatal mortality rates (NMR), stillbirth rates, and potential explanatory factors from 2010 to 2018 across the GN sites. Results From 2010 to 2018, there were 91,076 births in Pakistan and 456,276 births in the other GN sites combined. The MMR in Pakistan was 319 per 100,000 live births compared to an average of 124 in the other sites, while the Pakistan NMR was 49.4 per 1,000 live births compared to 20.4 in the other sites. The stillbirth rate in Pakistan was 53.5 per 1000 births compared to 23.2 for the other sites. Preterm birth and low birthweight rates were also substantially higher than the other sites combined. Within weight ranges, the Pakistani site generally had significantly higher rates of stillbirth and neonatal mortality than the other sites combined, with differences increasing as birthweights increased. By nearly every measure, medical care for pregnant women and their newborns in the Pakistan sites was worse than at the other sites combined. Conclusion The Pakistani pregnancy outcomes are much worse than those in the other GN sites. Reasons for these poorer outcomes likely include that the Pakistani sites' reproductive-aged women are largely poorly educated, undernourished, anemic, and deliver a high percentage of preterm and low-birthweight babies in settings of often inadequate maternal and newborn care. By addressing the issues highlighted in this paper there appears to be substantial room for improvements in Pakistan’s pregnancy outcomes.
topic Pakistan
Pregnancy outcomes
Maternal mortality
Stillbirth
Neonatal mortality
Risk factors
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-01023-5
work_keys_str_mv AT alehaaziz whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT sarahsaleem whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT tracylnolen whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT nousheenakberpradhan whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT elizabethmmcclure whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT saleemjessani whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT analgarces whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT patricialhibberd whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT janetlmoore whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT shivaprasadsgoudar whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT sangappamdhaded whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT fabianesamai whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT constancetenge whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT archanabpatel whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT elwynchomba whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT musakumwenechanya whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT carllbose whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT edwardaliechty whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT nancyfkrebs whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT richardjderman whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT waldemaracarlo whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT antoinettetshefu whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT marionkosothomas whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT sameensiddiqi whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT robertlgoldenberg whyarethepakistanimaternalfetalandnewbornoutcomessopoorcomparedtootherlowandmiddleincomecountries
_version_ 1724376975653470208
spelling doaj-bb6d0598740a4f6e83882e3db0a0df0b2020-12-20T12:13:12ZengBMCReproductive Health1742-47552020-12-0117S311210.1186/s12978-020-01023-5Why are the Pakistani maternal, fetal and newborn outcomes so poor compared to other low and middle-income countries?Aleha Aziz0Sarah Saleem1Tracy L. Nolen2Nousheen Akber Pradhan3Elizabeth M. McClure4Saleem Jessani5Ana L. Garces6Patricia L. Hibberd7Janet L. Moore8Shivaprasad S. Goudar9Sangappa M. Dhaded10Fabian Esamai11Constance Tenge12Archana B. Patel13Elwyn Chomba14Musaku Mwenechanya15Carl L. Bose16Edward A. Liechty17Nancy F. Krebs18Richard J. Derman19Waldemar A. Carlo20Antoinette Tshefu21Marion Koso-Thomas22Sameen Siddiqi23Robert L. Goldenberg24Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University School of MedicineAga Khan UniversityRTI InternationalAga Khan UniversityRTI InternationalAga Khan UniversityInstituto de Nutrición de Centroamérica y PanamáSchool of Public Health, Boston UniversityRTI InternationalJ N Medical College, KLE Academy Higher Education and ResearchJ N Medical College, KLE Academy Higher Education and ResearchMoi University School of MedicineMoi University School of MedicineLata Medical Research FoundationUniversity Teaching HospitalUniversity Teaching HospitalUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillIndiana School of Medicine, University of IndianaUniversity of Colorado School of MedicineThomas Jefferson UniversityUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamKinshasa School of Public HealthEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentAga Khan UniversityDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University School of MedicineAbstract Background Pakistan has among the poorest pregnancy outcomes worldwide, significantly worse than many other low-resource countries. The reasons for these differences are not clear. In this study, we compared pregnancy outcomes in Pakistan to other low-resource countries and explored factors that might help explain these differences. Methods The Global Network (GN) Maternal Newborn Health Registry (MNHR) is a prospective, population-based observational study that includes all pregnant women and their pregnancy outcomes in defined geographic communities in six low-middle income countries (India, Pakistan, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guatemala, Kenya, Zambia). Study staff enroll women in early pregnancy and follow-up soon after delivery and at 42 days to ascertain delivery, neonatal, and maternal outcomes. We analyzed the maternal mortality ratios (MMR), neonatal mortality rates (NMR), stillbirth rates, and potential explanatory factors from 2010 to 2018 across the GN sites. Results From 2010 to 2018, there were 91,076 births in Pakistan and 456,276 births in the other GN sites combined. The MMR in Pakistan was 319 per 100,000 live births compared to an average of 124 in the other sites, while the Pakistan NMR was 49.4 per 1,000 live births compared to 20.4 in the other sites. The stillbirth rate in Pakistan was 53.5 per 1000 births compared to 23.2 for the other sites. Preterm birth and low birthweight rates were also substantially higher than the other sites combined. Within weight ranges, the Pakistani site generally had significantly higher rates of stillbirth and neonatal mortality than the other sites combined, with differences increasing as birthweights increased. By nearly every measure, medical care for pregnant women and their newborns in the Pakistan sites was worse than at the other sites combined. Conclusion The Pakistani pregnancy outcomes are much worse than those in the other GN sites. Reasons for these poorer outcomes likely include that the Pakistani sites' reproductive-aged women are largely poorly educated, undernourished, anemic, and deliver a high percentage of preterm and low-birthweight babies in settings of often inadequate maternal and newborn care. By addressing the issues highlighted in this paper there appears to be substantial room for improvements in Pakistan’s pregnancy outcomes.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-01023-5PakistanPregnancy outcomesMaternal mortalityStillbirthNeonatal mortalityRisk factors