Revisiting chlorophyll extraction methods in biological soil crusts – methodology for determination of chlorophyll <i>a</i> and chlorophyll <i>a</i> + <i>b</i> as compared to previous methods
Chlorophyll concentrations of biological soil crust (biocrust) samples are commonly determined to quantify the relevance of photosynthetically active organisms within these surface soil communities. Whereas chlorophyll extraction methods for freshwater algae and leaf tissues of vascular plants a...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2018-03-01
|
Series: | Biogeosciences |
Online Access: | https://www.biogeosciences.net/15/1415/2018/bg-15-1415-2018.pdf |
id |
doaj-bb653a96847d48808d6ca859ce424375 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-bb653a96847d48808d6ca859ce4243752020-11-24T22:58:55ZengCopernicus PublicationsBiogeosciences1726-41701726-41892018-03-01151415142410.5194/bg-15-1415-2018Revisiting chlorophyll extraction methods in biological soil crusts – methodology for determination of chlorophyll <i>a</i> and chlorophyll <i>a</i> + <i>b</i> as compared to previous methodsJ. Caesar0J. Caesar1J. Caesar2A. Tamm3A. Tamm4N. Ruckteschler5N. Ruckteschler6A. L. Leifke7B. Weber8Multiphase Chemistry Department, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Hahn-Meitner-Weg 1, 55128 Mainz, GermanyPresent address: Department of Agriculture & Food Sciences, University of Applied Sciences, Brodaer Str. 2, 17033 Neubrandenburg, GermanyThese authors contributed equally to this work.Multiphase Chemistry Department, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Hahn-Meitner-Weg 1, 55128 Mainz, GermanyThese authors contributed equally to this work.Multiphase Chemistry Department, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Hahn-Meitner-Weg 1, 55128 Mainz, GermanyThese authors contributed equally to this work.Multiphase Chemistry Department, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Hahn-Meitner-Weg 1, 55128 Mainz, GermanyMultiphase Chemistry Department, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Hahn-Meitner-Weg 1, 55128 Mainz, GermanyChlorophyll concentrations of biological soil crust (biocrust) samples are commonly determined to quantify the relevance of photosynthetically active organisms within these surface soil communities. Whereas chlorophyll extraction methods for freshwater algae and leaf tissues of vascular plants are well established, there is still some uncertainty regarding the optimal extraction method for biocrusts, where organism composition is highly variable and samples comprise major amounts of soil. In this study we analyzed the efficiency of two different chlorophyll extraction solvents, the effect of grinding the soil samples prior to the extraction procedure, and the impact of shaking as an intermediate step during extraction. The analyses were conducted on four different types of biocrusts. Our results show that for all biocrust types chlorophyll contents obtained with ethanol were significantly lower than those obtained using dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) as a solvent. Grinding of biocrust samples prior to analysis caused a highly significant decrease in chlorophyll content for green algal lichen- and cyanolichen-dominated biocrusts, and a tendency towards lower values for moss- and algae-dominated biocrusts. Shaking of the samples after each extraction step had a significant positive effect on the chlorophyll content of green algal lichen- and cyanolichen-dominated biocrusts. Based on our results we confirm a DMSO-based chlorophyll extraction method without grinding pretreatment and suggest the addition of an intermediate shaking step for complete chlorophyll extraction (see Supplement S6 for detailed manual). Determination of a universal chlorophyll extraction method for biocrusts is essential for the inter-comparability of publications conducted across all continents.https://www.biogeosciences.net/15/1415/2018/bg-15-1415-2018.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
J. Caesar J. Caesar J. Caesar A. Tamm A. Tamm N. Ruckteschler N. Ruckteschler A. L. Leifke B. Weber |
spellingShingle |
J. Caesar J. Caesar J. Caesar A. Tamm A. Tamm N. Ruckteschler N. Ruckteschler A. L. Leifke B. Weber Revisiting chlorophyll extraction methods in biological soil crusts – methodology for determination of chlorophyll <i>a</i> and chlorophyll <i>a</i> + <i>b</i> as compared to previous methods Biogeosciences |
author_facet |
J. Caesar J. Caesar J. Caesar A. Tamm A. Tamm N. Ruckteschler N. Ruckteschler A. L. Leifke B. Weber |
author_sort |
J. Caesar |
title |
Revisiting chlorophyll extraction methods in biological soil crusts – methodology for determination of chlorophyll <i>a</i> and chlorophyll <i>a</i> + <i>b</i> as compared to previous methods |
title_short |
Revisiting chlorophyll extraction methods in biological soil crusts – methodology for determination of chlorophyll <i>a</i> and chlorophyll <i>a</i> + <i>b</i> as compared to previous methods |
title_full |
Revisiting chlorophyll extraction methods in biological soil crusts – methodology for determination of chlorophyll <i>a</i> and chlorophyll <i>a</i> + <i>b</i> as compared to previous methods |
title_fullStr |
Revisiting chlorophyll extraction methods in biological soil crusts – methodology for determination of chlorophyll <i>a</i> and chlorophyll <i>a</i> + <i>b</i> as compared to previous methods |
title_full_unstemmed |
Revisiting chlorophyll extraction methods in biological soil crusts – methodology for determination of chlorophyll <i>a</i> and chlorophyll <i>a</i> + <i>b</i> as compared to previous methods |
title_sort |
revisiting chlorophyll extraction methods in biological soil crusts – methodology for determination of chlorophyll <i>a</i> and chlorophyll <i>a</i> + <i>b</i> as compared to previous methods |
publisher |
Copernicus Publications |
series |
Biogeosciences |
issn |
1726-4170 1726-4189 |
publishDate |
2018-03-01 |
description |
Chlorophyll concentrations of biological soil crust (biocrust) samples are
commonly determined to quantify the relevance of photosynthetically active
organisms within these surface soil communities. Whereas chlorophyll
extraction methods for freshwater algae and leaf tissues of vascular plants
are well established, there is still some uncertainty regarding the optimal
extraction method for biocrusts, where organism composition is highly
variable and samples comprise major amounts of soil. In this study we
analyzed the efficiency of two different chlorophyll extraction solvents, the
effect of grinding the soil samples prior to the extraction procedure, and
the impact of shaking as an intermediate step during extraction. The analyses
were conducted on four different types of biocrusts. Our results show that
for all biocrust types chlorophyll contents obtained with ethanol were
significantly lower than those obtained using dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) as a
solvent. Grinding of biocrust samples prior to analysis caused a highly
significant decrease in chlorophyll content for green algal lichen- and
cyanolichen-dominated biocrusts, and a tendency towards lower values for
moss- and algae-dominated biocrusts. Shaking of the samples after each
extraction step had a significant positive effect on the chlorophyll content
of green algal lichen- and cyanolichen-dominated biocrusts. Based on our
results we confirm a DMSO-based chlorophyll extraction method without
grinding pretreatment and suggest the addition of an intermediate shaking
step for complete chlorophyll extraction (see Supplement S6 for detailed
manual). Determination of a universal chlorophyll extraction method for
biocrusts is essential for the inter-comparability of publications conducted
across all continents. |
url |
https://www.biogeosciences.net/15/1415/2018/bg-15-1415-2018.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jcaesar revisitingchlorophyllextractionmethodsinbiologicalsoilcrustsmethodologyfordeterminationofchlorophylliaiandchlorophylliaiibiascomparedtopreviousmethods AT jcaesar revisitingchlorophyllextractionmethodsinbiologicalsoilcrustsmethodologyfordeterminationofchlorophylliaiandchlorophylliaiibiascomparedtopreviousmethods AT jcaesar revisitingchlorophyllextractionmethodsinbiologicalsoilcrustsmethodologyfordeterminationofchlorophylliaiandchlorophylliaiibiascomparedtopreviousmethods AT atamm revisitingchlorophyllextractionmethodsinbiologicalsoilcrustsmethodologyfordeterminationofchlorophylliaiandchlorophylliaiibiascomparedtopreviousmethods AT atamm revisitingchlorophyllextractionmethodsinbiologicalsoilcrustsmethodologyfordeterminationofchlorophylliaiandchlorophylliaiibiascomparedtopreviousmethods AT nruckteschler revisitingchlorophyllextractionmethodsinbiologicalsoilcrustsmethodologyfordeterminationofchlorophylliaiandchlorophylliaiibiascomparedtopreviousmethods AT nruckteschler revisitingchlorophyllextractionmethodsinbiologicalsoilcrustsmethodologyfordeterminationofchlorophylliaiandchlorophylliaiibiascomparedtopreviousmethods AT alleifke revisitingchlorophyllextractionmethodsinbiologicalsoilcrustsmethodologyfordeterminationofchlorophylliaiandchlorophylliaiibiascomparedtopreviousmethods AT bweber revisitingchlorophyllextractionmethodsinbiologicalsoilcrustsmethodologyfordeterminationofchlorophylliaiandchlorophylliaiibiascomparedtopreviousmethods |
_version_ |
1725646054491160576 |