Revisiting chlorophyll extraction methods in biological soil crusts – methodology for determination of chlorophyll <i>a</i> and chlorophyll <i>a</i> + <i>b</i> as compared to previous methods

Chlorophyll concentrations of biological soil crust (biocrust) samples are commonly determined to quantify the relevance of photosynthetically active organisms within these surface soil communities. Whereas chlorophyll extraction methods for freshwater algae and leaf tissues of vascular plants a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. Caesar, A. Tamm, N. Ruckteschler, A. L. Leifke, B. Weber
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2018-03-01
Series:Biogeosciences
Online Access:https://www.biogeosciences.net/15/1415/2018/bg-15-1415-2018.pdf
id doaj-bb653a96847d48808d6ca859ce424375
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bb653a96847d48808d6ca859ce4243752020-11-24T22:58:55ZengCopernicus PublicationsBiogeosciences1726-41701726-41892018-03-01151415142410.5194/bg-15-1415-2018Revisiting chlorophyll extraction methods in biological soil crusts – methodology for determination of chlorophyll <i>a</i> and chlorophyll <i>a</i> + <i>b</i> as compared to previous methodsJ. Caesar0J. Caesar1J. Caesar2A. Tamm3A. Tamm4N. Ruckteschler5N. Ruckteschler6A. L. Leifke7B. Weber8Multiphase Chemistry Department, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Hahn-Meitner-Weg 1, 55128 Mainz, GermanyPresent address: Department of Agriculture & Food Sciences, University of Applied Sciences, Brodaer Str. 2, 17033 Neubrandenburg, GermanyThese authors contributed equally to this work.Multiphase Chemistry Department, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Hahn-Meitner-Weg 1, 55128 Mainz, GermanyThese authors contributed equally to this work.Multiphase Chemistry Department, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Hahn-Meitner-Weg 1, 55128 Mainz, GermanyThese authors contributed equally to this work.Multiphase Chemistry Department, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Hahn-Meitner-Weg 1, 55128 Mainz, GermanyMultiphase Chemistry Department, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Hahn-Meitner-Weg 1, 55128 Mainz, GermanyChlorophyll concentrations of biological soil crust (biocrust) samples are commonly determined to quantify the relevance of photosynthetically active organisms within these surface soil communities. Whereas chlorophyll extraction methods for freshwater algae and leaf tissues of vascular plants are well established, there is still some uncertainty regarding the optimal extraction method for biocrusts, where organism composition is highly variable and samples comprise major amounts of soil. In this study we analyzed the efficiency of two different chlorophyll extraction solvents, the effect of grinding the soil samples prior to the extraction procedure, and the impact of shaking as an intermediate step during extraction. The analyses were conducted on four different types of biocrusts. Our results show that for all biocrust types chlorophyll contents obtained with ethanol were significantly lower than those obtained using dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) as a solvent. Grinding of biocrust samples prior to analysis caused a highly significant decrease in chlorophyll content for green algal lichen- and cyanolichen-dominated biocrusts, and a tendency towards lower values for moss- and algae-dominated biocrusts. Shaking of the samples after each extraction step had a significant positive effect on the chlorophyll content of green algal lichen- and cyanolichen-dominated biocrusts. Based on our results we confirm a DMSO-based chlorophyll extraction method without grinding pretreatment and suggest the addition of an intermediate shaking step for complete chlorophyll extraction (see Supplement S6 for detailed manual). Determination of a universal chlorophyll extraction method for biocrusts is essential for the inter-comparability of publications conducted across all continents.https://www.biogeosciences.net/15/1415/2018/bg-15-1415-2018.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author J. Caesar
J. Caesar
J. Caesar
A. Tamm
A. Tamm
N. Ruckteschler
N. Ruckteschler
A. L. Leifke
B. Weber
spellingShingle J. Caesar
J. Caesar
J. Caesar
A. Tamm
A. Tamm
N. Ruckteschler
N. Ruckteschler
A. L. Leifke
B. Weber
Revisiting chlorophyll extraction methods in biological soil crusts – methodology for determination of chlorophyll <i>a</i> and chlorophyll <i>a</i> + <i>b</i> as compared to previous methods
Biogeosciences
author_facet J. Caesar
J. Caesar
J. Caesar
A. Tamm
A. Tamm
N. Ruckteschler
N. Ruckteschler
A. L. Leifke
B. Weber
author_sort J. Caesar
title Revisiting chlorophyll extraction methods in biological soil crusts – methodology for determination of chlorophyll <i>a</i> and chlorophyll <i>a</i> + <i>b</i> as compared to previous methods
title_short Revisiting chlorophyll extraction methods in biological soil crusts – methodology for determination of chlorophyll <i>a</i> and chlorophyll <i>a</i> + <i>b</i> as compared to previous methods
title_full Revisiting chlorophyll extraction methods in biological soil crusts – methodology for determination of chlorophyll <i>a</i> and chlorophyll <i>a</i> + <i>b</i> as compared to previous methods
title_fullStr Revisiting chlorophyll extraction methods in biological soil crusts – methodology for determination of chlorophyll <i>a</i> and chlorophyll <i>a</i> + <i>b</i> as compared to previous methods
title_full_unstemmed Revisiting chlorophyll extraction methods in biological soil crusts – methodology for determination of chlorophyll <i>a</i> and chlorophyll <i>a</i> + <i>b</i> as compared to previous methods
title_sort revisiting chlorophyll extraction methods in biological soil crusts – methodology for determination of chlorophyll <i>a</i> and chlorophyll <i>a</i> + <i>b</i> as compared to previous methods
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Biogeosciences
issn 1726-4170
1726-4189
publishDate 2018-03-01
description Chlorophyll concentrations of biological soil crust (biocrust) samples are commonly determined to quantify the relevance of photosynthetically active organisms within these surface soil communities. Whereas chlorophyll extraction methods for freshwater algae and leaf tissues of vascular plants are well established, there is still some uncertainty regarding the optimal extraction method for biocrusts, where organism composition is highly variable and samples comprise major amounts of soil. In this study we analyzed the efficiency of two different chlorophyll extraction solvents, the effect of grinding the soil samples prior to the extraction procedure, and the impact of shaking as an intermediate step during extraction. The analyses were conducted on four different types of biocrusts. Our results show that for all biocrust types chlorophyll contents obtained with ethanol were significantly lower than those obtained using dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) as a solvent. Grinding of biocrust samples prior to analysis caused a highly significant decrease in chlorophyll content for green algal lichen- and cyanolichen-dominated biocrusts, and a tendency towards lower values for moss- and algae-dominated biocrusts. Shaking of the samples after each extraction step had a significant positive effect on the chlorophyll content of green algal lichen- and cyanolichen-dominated biocrusts. Based on our results we confirm a DMSO-based chlorophyll extraction method without grinding pretreatment and suggest the addition of an intermediate shaking step for complete chlorophyll extraction (see Supplement S6 for detailed manual). Determination of a universal chlorophyll extraction method for biocrusts is essential for the inter-comparability of publications conducted across all continents.
url https://www.biogeosciences.net/15/1415/2018/bg-15-1415-2018.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jcaesar revisitingchlorophyllextractionmethodsinbiologicalsoilcrustsmethodologyfordeterminationofchlorophylliaiandchlorophylliaiibiascomparedtopreviousmethods
AT jcaesar revisitingchlorophyllextractionmethodsinbiologicalsoilcrustsmethodologyfordeterminationofchlorophylliaiandchlorophylliaiibiascomparedtopreviousmethods
AT jcaesar revisitingchlorophyllextractionmethodsinbiologicalsoilcrustsmethodologyfordeterminationofchlorophylliaiandchlorophylliaiibiascomparedtopreviousmethods
AT atamm revisitingchlorophyllextractionmethodsinbiologicalsoilcrustsmethodologyfordeterminationofchlorophylliaiandchlorophylliaiibiascomparedtopreviousmethods
AT atamm revisitingchlorophyllextractionmethodsinbiologicalsoilcrustsmethodologyfordeterminationofchlorophylliaiandchlorophylliaiibiascomparedtopreviousmethods
AT nruckteschler revisitingchlorophyllextractionmethodsinbiologicalsoilcrustsmethodologyfordeterminationofchlorophylliaiandchlorophylliaiibiascomparedtopreviousmethods
AT nruckteschler revisitingchlorophyllextractionmethodsinbiologicalsoilcrustsmethodologyfordeterminationofchlorophylliaiandchlorophylliaiibiascomparedtopreviousmethods
AT alleifke revisitingchlorophyllextractionmethodsinbiologicalsoilcrustsmethodologyfordeterminationofchlorophylliaiandchlorophylliaiibiascomparedtopreviousmethods
AT bweber revisitingchlorophyllextractionmethodsinbiologicalsoilcrustsmethodologyfordeterminationofchlorophylliaiandchlorophylliaiibiascomparedtopreviousmethods
_version_ 1725646054491160576