Great Power Management and China's Responsibility in International Climate Politics

By exploring international practice of great power management, this paper examines how the U.S. (an established power) and China (an emerging power) discursively frame great power responsibility in the context of international negotiations on climate politics. Firstly, this paper will argue that th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sanna Kopra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Aalborg University Press 2016-05-01
Series:Journal of China and International Relations
Online Access:https://journals.aau.dk/index.php/jcir/article/view/1513
id doaj-bb555f90d385494abcae13db70a42ece
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bb555f90d385494abcae13db70a42ece2021-01-27T14:15:15ZengAalborg University PressJournal of China and International Relations2245-89212016-05-014110.5278/ojs.jcir.v4i1.1513Great Power Management and China's Responsibility in International Climate PoliticsSanna Kopra By exploring international practice of great power management, this paper examines how the U.S. (an established power) and China (an emerging power) discursively frame great power responsibility in the context of international negotiations on climate politics. Firstly, this paper will argue that the American discourse on "responsible great powerhood" attempts to redirect and constrain China’s position in global politics. Secondly, this paper claims that China defends its interests and responds to Western demands by advancing two, partly conflicting, climate discourses simultaneously. On the one hand, despite its growing international status, China emphasizes its status as a poor developing country. On the other, the rhetoric of being a "responsible major power" is used to assure other nations of China's credibility and benevolence; China is neither a threat to other countries nor to the environment. https://journals.aau.dk/index.php/jcir/article/view/1513
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sanna Kopra
spellingShingle Sanna Kopra
Great Power Management and China's Responsibility in International Climate Politics
Journal of China and International Relations
author_facet Sanna Kopra
author_sort Sanna Kopra
title Great Power Management and China's Responsibility in International Climate Politics
title_short Great Power Management and China's Responsibility in International Climate Politics
title_full Great Power Management and China's Responsibility in International Climate Politics
title_fullStr Great Power Management and China's Responsibility in International Climate Politics
title_full_unstemmed Great Power Management and China's Responsibility in International Climate Politics
title_sort great power management and china's responsibility in international climate politics
publisher Aalborg University Press
series Journal of China and International Relations
issn 2245-8921
publishDate 2016-05-01
description By exploring international practice of great power management, this paper examines how the U.S. (an established power) and China (an emerging power) discursively frame great power responsibility in the context of international negotiations on climate politics. Firstly, this paper will argue that the American discourse on "responsible great powerhood" attempts to redirect and constrain China’s position in global politics. Secondly, this paper claims that China defends its interests and responds to Western demands by advancing two, partly conflicting, climate discourses simultaneously. On the one hand, despite its growing international status, China emphasizes its status as a poor developing country. On the other, the rhetoric of being a "responsible major power" is used to assure other nations of China's credibility and benevolence; China is neither a threat to other countries nor to the environment.
url https://journals.aau.dk/index.php/jcir/article/view/1513
work_keys_str_mv AT sannakopra greatpowermanagementandchinasresponsibilityininternationalclimatepolitics
_version_ 1724321094005948416