An in vitro correlation of metastatic capacity and dual mechanostimulation.
Cells are under the influence of multiple forms of mechanical stimulation in vivo. For example, a cell is subjected to mechanical forces from tissue stiffness, shear and tensile stress and transient applied strain. Significant progress has been made in understanding the cellular mechanotransduction...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2018-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6241134?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-bb4e968fc2ee4fe3971d948a574c2167 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-bb4e968fc2ee4fe3971d948a574c21672020-11-25T01:19:27ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-011311e020749010.1371/journal.pone.0207490An in vitro correlation of metastatic capacity and dual mechanostimulation.Indrajyoti IndraAlexander N GasparskiKaren A BeningoCells are under the influence of multiple forms of mechanical stimulation in vivo. For example, a cell is subjected to mechanical forces from tissue stiffness, shear and tensile stress and transient applied strain. Significant progress has been made in understanding the cellular mechanotransduction mechanisms in response to a single mechanical parameter. However, our knowledge of how a cell responds to multiple mechanical inputs is currently limited. In this study, we have tested the cellular response to the simultaneous application of two mechanical inputs: substrate compliance and transient tugging. Our results suggest that cells within a multicellular spheroid will restrict their response to a single mechanical input at a time and when provided with two mechanical inputs simultaneously, one will dominate. In normal and non-metastatic mammary epithelial cells, we found that they respond to applied stimulation and will override substrate compliance cues in favor of the applied mechanical stimulus. Surprisingly, however, metastatic mammary epithelial cells remain non-responsive to both mechanical cues. Our results suggest that, within our assay system, metastatic progression may involve the down-regulation of multiple mechanotransduction pathways.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6241134?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Indrajyoti Indra Alexander N Gasparski Karen A Beningo |
spellingShingle |
Indrajyoti Indra Alexander N Gasparski Karen A Beningo An in vitro correlation of metastatic capacity and dual mechanostimulation. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Indrajyoti Indra Alexander N Gasparski Karen A Beningo |
author_sort |
Indrajyoti Indra |
title |
An in vitro correlation of metastatic capacity and dual mechanostimulation. |
title_short |
An in vitro correlation of metastatic capacity and dual mechanostimulation. |
title_full |
An in vitro correlation of metastatic capacity and dual mechanostimulation. |
title_fullStr |
An in vitro correlation of metastatic capacity and dual mechanostimulation. |
title_full_unstemmed |
An in vitro correlation of metastatic capacity and dual mechanostimulation. |
title_sort |
in vitro correlation of metastatic capacity and dual mechanostimulation. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
Cells are under the influence of multiple forms of mechanical stimulation in vivo. For example, a cell is subjected to mechanical forces from tissue stiffness, shear and tensile stress and transient applied strain. Significant progress has been made in understanding the cellular mechanotransduction mechanisms in response to a single mechanical parameter. However, our knowledge of how a cell responds to multiple mechanical inputs is currently limited. In this study, we have tested the cellular response to the simultaneous application of two mechanical inputs: substrate compliance and transient tugging. Our results suggest that cells within a multicellular spheroid will restrict their response to a single mechanical input at a time and when provided with two mechanical inputs simultaneously, one will dominate. In normal and non-metastatic mammary epithelial cells, we found that they respond to applied stimulation and will override substrate compliance cues in favor of the applied mechanical stimulus. Surprisingly, however, metastatic mammary epithelial cells remain non-responsive to both mechanical cues. Our results suggest that, within our assay system, metastatic progression may involve the down-regulation of multiple mechanotransduction pathways. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6241134?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT indrajyotiindra aninvitrocorrelationofmetastaticcapacityanddualmechanostimulation AT alexanderngasparski aninvitrocorrelationofmetastaticcapacityanddualmechanostimulation AT karenabeningo aninvitrocorrelationofmetastaticcapacityanddualmechanostimulation AT indrajyotiindra invitrocorrelationofmetastaticcapacityanddualmechanostimulation AT alexanderngasparski invitrocorrelationofmetastaticcapacityanddualmechanostimulation AT karenabeningo invitrocorrelationofmetastaticcapacityanddualmechanostimulation |
_version_ |
1725138153796272128 |