Making All Children Count: Teach For All and the Universalizing Appeal of Data

In this paper, we argue that in order to bind Teach For All’s universal/izing statement of problems and solutions to the specificities and the special conditions of member programs’ local contexts, what is needed is a shared set of discursive practices, a way of bringing together the commonalities f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel Friedrich, Mia Walter, Erica Colmenares
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Arizona State University 2015-04-01
Series:Education Policy Analysis Archives
Subjects:
Online Access:https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/1797
id doaj-bb2f30b47c9e4ce1b983ac6136e38ec0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bb2f30b47c9e4ce1b983ac6136e38ec02020-11-25T03:00:42ZengArizona State UniversityEducation Policy Analysis Archives1068-23412015-04-0123010.14507/epaa.v23.17971358Making All Children Count: Teach For All and the Universalizing Appeal of DataDaniel Friedrich0Mia Walter1Erica Colmenares2Teachers College, Columbia UniversityTeachers College, Columbia UniversityTeachers College, Columbia UniversityIn this paper, we argue that in order to bind Teach For All’s universal/izing statement of problems and solutions to the specificities and the special conditions of member programs’ local contexts, what is needed is a shared set of discursive practices, a way of bringing together the commonalities found in each country while separating the noise of particular politics and histories. That common set of discursive practices is shaped around the notion of data. This paper is structured as follows: First, we contextualize Teach for All by (briefly) juxtaposing the universal and specific elements of the network, including the organization’s mission, target population, its recruits (and recruiting tactics), vision, and its production of a particular kind of teacher. Then, we present the two competing, yet complementary, logics of data that are at play in Teach for All – the use of data itself and the notion of data speak – along with their underlying assumptions. We conclude by questioning the logics of this set of discursive practices, and outline our skepticism regarding how data is mobilized to produce particular subjectivities and objects.https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/1797data interpretationteacher educationglobalization
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Daniel Friedrich
Mia Walter
Erica Colmenares
spellingShingle Daniel Friedrich
Mia Walter
Erica Colmenares
Making All Children Count: Teach For All and the Universalizing Appeal of Data
Education Policy Analysis Archives
data interpretation
teacher education
globalization
author_facet Daniel Friedrich
Mia Walter
Erica Colmenares
author_sort Daniel Friedrich
title Making All Children Count: Teach For All and the Universalizing Appeal of Data
title_short Making All Children Count: Teach For All and the Universalizing Appeal of Data
title_full Making All Children Count: Teach For All and the Universalizing Appeal of Data
title_fullStr Making All Children Count: Teach For All and the Universalizing Appeal of Data
title_full_unstemmed Making All Children Count: Teach For All and the Universalizing Appeal of Data
title_sort making all children count: teach for all and the universalizing appeal of data
publisher Arizona State University
series Education Policy Analysis Archives
issn 1068-2341
publishDate 2015-04-01
description In this paper, we argue that in order to bind Teach For All’s universal/izing statement of problems and solutions to the specificities and the special conditions of member programs’ local contexts, what is needed is a shared set of discursive practices, a way of bringing together the commonalities found in each country while separating the noise of particular politics and histories. That common set of discursive practices is shaped around the notion of data. This paper is structured as follows: First, we contextualize Teach for All by (briefly) juxtaposing the universal and specific elements of the network, including the organization’s mission, target population, its recruits (and recruiting tactics), vision, and its production of a particular kind of teacher. Then, we present the two competing, yet complementary, logics of data that are at play in Teach for All – the use of data itself and the notion of data speak – along with their underlying assumptions. We conclude by questioning the logics of this set of discursive practices, and outline our skepticism regarding how data is mobilized to produce particular subjectivities and objects.
topic data interpretation
teacher education
globalization
url https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/1797
work_keys_str_mv AT danielfriedrich makingallchildrencountteachforallandtheuniversalizingappealofdata
AT miawalter makingallchildrencountteachforallandtheuniversalizingappealofdata
AT ericacolmenares makingallchildrencountteachforallandtheuniversalizingappealofdata
_version_ 1724696424670560256