Making All Children Count: Teach For All and the Universalizing Appeal of Data
In this paper, we argue that in order to bind Teach For All’s universal/izing statement of problems and solutions to the specificities and the special conditions of member programs’ local contexts, what is needed is a shared set of discursive practices, a way of bringing together the commonalities f...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Arizona State University
2015-04-01
|
Series: | Education Policy Analysis Archives |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/1797 |
id |
doaj-bb2f30b47c9e4ce1b983ac6136e38ec0 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-bb2f30b47c9e4ce1b983ac6136e38ec02020-11-25T03:00:42ZengArizona State UniversityEducation Policy Analysis Archives1068-23412015-04-0123010.14507/epaa.v23.17971358Making All Children Count: Teach For All and the Universalizing Appeal of DataDaniel Friedrich0Mia Walter1Erica Colmenares2Teachers College, Columbia UniversityTeachers College, Columbia UniversityTeachers College, Columbia UniversityIn this paper, we argue that in order to bind Teach For All’s universal/izing statement of problems and solutions to the specificities and the special conditions of member programs’ local contexts, what is needed is a shared set of discursive practices, a way of bringing together the commonalities found in each country while separating the noise of particular politics and histories. That common set of discursive practices is shaped around the notion of data. This paper is structured as follows: First, we contextualize Teach for All by (briefly) juxtaposing the universal and specific elements of the network, including the organization’s mission, target population, its recruits (and recruiting tactics), vision, and its production of a particular kind of teacher. Then, we present the two competing, yet complementary, logics of data that are at play in Teach for All – the use of data itself and the notion of data speak – along with their underlying assumptions. We conclude by questioning the logics of this set of discursive practices, and outline our skepticism regarding how data is mobilized to produce particular subjectivities and objects.https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/1797data interpretationteacher educationglobalization |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Daniel Friedrich Mia Walter Erica Colmenares |
spellingShingle |
Daniel Friedrich Mia Walter Erica Colmenares Making All Children Count: Teach For All and the Universalizing Appeal of Data Education Policy Analysis Archives data interpretation teacher education globalization |
author_facet |
Daniel Friedrich Mia Walter Erica Colmenares |
author_sort |
Daniel Friedrich |
title |
Making All Children Count: Teach For All and the Universalizing Appeal of Data |
title_short |
Making All Children Count: Teach For All and the Universalizing Appeal of Data |
title_full |
Making All Children Count: Teach For All and the Universalizing Appeal of Data |
title_fullStr |
Making All Children Count: Teach For All and the Universalizing Appeal of Data |
title_full_unstemmed |
Making All Children Count: Teach For All and the Universalizing Appeal of Data |
title_sort |
making all children count: teach for all and the universalizing appeal of data |
publisher |
Arizona State University |
series |
Education Policy Analysis Archives |
issn |
1068-2341 |
publishDate |
2015-04-01 |
description |
In this paper, we argue that in order to bind Teach For All’s universal/izing statement of problems and solutions to the specificities and the special conditions of member programs’ local contexts, what is needed is a shared set of discursive practices, a way of bringing together the commonalities found in each country while separating the noise of particular politics and histories. That common set of discursive practices is shaped around the notion of data. This paper is structured as follows: First, we contextualize Teach for All by (briefly) juxtaposing the universal and specific elements of the network, including the organization’s mission, target population, its recruits (and recruiting tactics), vision, and its production of a particular kind of teacher. Then, we present the two competing, yet complementary, logics of data that are at play in Teach for All – the use of data itself and the notion of data speak – along with their underlying assumptions. We conclude by questioning the logics of this set of discursive practices, and outline our skepticism regarding how data is mobilized to produce particular subjectivities and objects. |
topic |
data interpretation teacher education globalization |
url |
https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/1797 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT danielfriedrich makingallchildrencountteachforallandtheuniversalizingappealofdata AT miawalter makingallchildrencountteachforallandtheuniversalizingappealofdata AT ericacolmenares makingallchildrencountteachforallandtheuniversalizingappealofdata |
_version_ |
1724696424670560256 |