A multivariate model of stakeholder preference for lethal cat management.

Identifying stakeholder beliefs and attitudes is critical for resolving management conflicts. Debate over outdoor cat management is often described as a conflict between two groups, environmental advocates and animal welfare advocates, but little is known about the variables predicting differences a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dara M Wald, Susan K Jacobson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3988042?pdf=render
id doaj-bb2a83d9263b4cb99a5c4ac285102fdc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bb2a83d9263b4cb99a5c4ac285102fdc2020-11-24T22:04:57ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0194e9311810.1371/journal.pone.0093118A multivariate model of stakeholder preference for lethal cat management.Dara M WaldSusan K JacobsonIdentifying stakeholder beliefs and attitudes is critical for resolving management conflicts. Debate over outdoor cat management is often described as a conflict between two groups, environmental advocates and animal welfare advocates, but little is known about the variables predicting differences among these critical stakeholder groups. We administered a mail survey to randomly selected stakeholders representing both of these groups (n=1,596) in Florida, where contention over the management of outdoor cats has been widespread. We used a structural equation model to evaluate stakeholder intention to support non-lethal management. The cognitive hierarchy model predicted that values influenced beliefs, which predicted general and specific attitudes, which in turn, influenced behavioral intentions. We posited that specific attitudes would mediate the effect of general attitudes, beliefs, and values on management support. Model fit statistics suggested that the final model fit the data well (CFI=0.94, RMSEA=0.062). The final model explained 74% of the variance in management support, and positive attitudes toward lethal management (humaneness) had the largest direct effect on management support. Specific attitudes toward lethal management and general attitudes toward outdoor cats mediated the relationship between positive (p<0.05) and negative cat-related impact beliefs (p<0.05) and support for management. These results supported the specificity hypothesis and the use of the cognitive hierarchy to assess stakeholder intention to support non-lethal cat management. Our findings suggest that stakeholders can simultaneously perceive both positive and negative beliefs about outdoor cats, which influence attitudes toward and support for non-lethal management.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3988042?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dara M Wald
Susan K Jacobson
spellingShingle Dara M Wald
Susan K Jacobson
A multivariate model of stakeholder preference for lethal cat management.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Dara M Wald
Susan K Jacobson
author_sort Dara M Wald
title A multivariate model of stakeholder preference for lethal cat management.
title_short A multivariate model of stakeholder preference for lethal cat management.
title_full A multivariate model of stakeholder preference for lethal cat management.
title_fullStr A multivariate model of stakeholder preference for lethal cat management.
title_full_unstemmed A multivariate model of stakeholder preference for lethal cat management.
title_sort multivariate model of stakeholder preference for lethal cat management.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Identifying stakeholder beliefs and attitudes is critical for resolving management conflicts. Debate over outdoor cat management is often described as a conflict between two groups, environmental advocates and animal welfare advocates, but little is known about the variables predicting differences among these critical stakeholder groups. We administered a mail survey to randomly selected stakeholders representing both of these groups (n=1,596) in Florida, where contention over the management of outdoor cats has been widespread. We used a structural equation model to evaluate stakeholder intention to support non-lethal management. The cognitive hierarchy model predicted that values influenced beliefs, which predicted general and specific attitudes, which in turn, influenced behavioral intentions. We posited that specific attitudes would mediate the effect of general attitudes, beliefs, and values on management support. Model fit statistics suggested that the final model fit the data well (CFI=0.94, RMSEA=0.062). The final model explained 74% of the variance in management support, and positive attitudes toward lethal management (humaneness) had the largest direct effect on management support. Specific attitudes toward lethal management and general attitudes toward outdoor cats mediated the relationship between positive (p<0.05) and negative cat-related impact beliefs (p<0.05) and support for management. These results supported the specificity hypothesis and the use of the cognitive hierarchy to assess stakeholder intention to support non-lethal cat management. Our findings suggest that stakeholders can simultaneously perceive both positive and negative beliefs about outdoor cats, which influence attitudes toward and support for non-lethal management.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3988042?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT daramwald amultivariatemodelofstakeholderpreferenceforlethalcatmanagement
AT susankjacobson amultivariatemodelofstakeholderpreferenceforlethalcatmanagement
AT daramwald multivariatemodelofstakeholderpreferenceforlethalcatmanagement
AT susankjacobson multivariatemodelofstakeholderpreferenceforlethalcatmanagement
_version_ 1725828103386693632