Validating two questions in the Force Concept Inventory with subquestions
In this study, we evaluate the structural validity of Q.16 and Q.7 in the Force Concept Inventory (FCI). We address whether respondents who answer Q.16 and Q.7 correctly actually have an understanding of the concepts of physics tested in the questions. To examine respondents’ levels of understanding...
Main Authors: | Jun-ichiro Yasuda, Masa-aki Taniguchi |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
American Physical Society
2013-04-01
|
Series: | Physical Review Special Topics. Physics Education Research |
Online Access: | http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.9.010113 |
Similar Items
-
Validating the Force Concept Inventory with Sub-Questions: Preliminary Results of the Second Year Survey
by: Jun-ichiro Yasuda, et al.
Published: (2017-04-01) -
Validating the Force Concept Inventory with Sub-Questions: Preliminary Results of the Second Year Survey
by: Jun-ichiro Yasuda, et al.
Published: (2017-04-01) -
Validating the Force Concept Inventory with Sub-Questions: Preliminary Results of the Second Year Survey
by: Jun-ichiro Yasuda, et al.
Published: (2017-04-01) -
Analyzing false positives of four questions in the Force Concept Inventory
by: Jun-ichiro Yasuda, et al.
Published: (2018-03-01) -
Optimizing the length of computerized adaptive testing for the Force Concept Inventory
by: Jun-ichiro Yasuda, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01)