Comparison of Classical and Robust Estimates of Threshold Auto-regression Parameters

The exponential auto-regression model is a discrete analog of the second-order nonlinear differential equations of the type of Duffing and van der Pol oscillators. It is used to describe nonlinear stochastic processes with discrete time, such as vehicle vibrations, ship roll, electrical signals in t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: V. B. Goryainov, W. M. Khing
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: MGTU im. N.È. Baumana 2021-02-01
Series:Matematika i Matematičeskoe Modelirovanie
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mathmelpub.ru/jour/article/view/224
id doaj-bb0ba98fdca246a0b73ef6941a92f768
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bb0ba98fdca246a0b73ef6941a92f7682021-07-28T21:09:07ZrusMGTU im. N.È. BaumanaMatematika i Matematičeskoe Modelirovanie2412-59112021-02-0105334410.24108/mathm.0520.0000224150Comparison of Classical and Robust Estimates of Threshold Auto-regression ParametersV. B. Goryainov0W. M. Khing1Bauman Moscow State Technical University, MoscowBauman Moscow State Technical University, MoscowThe exponential auto-regression model is a discrete analog of the second-order nonlinear differential equations of the type of Duffing and van der Pol oscillators. It is used to describe nonlinear stochastic processes with discrete time, such as vehicle vibrations, ship roll, electrical signals in the cerebral cortex. When applying the model in practice, one of the important tasks is its identification, in particular, an estimate of the model parameters from observations of the stochastic process it described. A traditional technique to estimate autoregressive parameters is the nonlinear least squares method. Its disadvantage is high sensitivity to the measurement errors of the process observed. The M-estimate method largely has no such a drawback. The M-estimates are based on the minimization procedure of a non-convex function of several variables. The paper studies the effectiveness of several well-known minimization methods to find the M-estimates of the parameters of an exponential autoregressive model. The paper demonstrates that the sequential quadratic programming algorithm, the active set algorithm, and the interior-point algorithm have shown the best and approximately the same accuracy. The quasi-Newton algorithm is inferior to them in accuracy a little bit, but is not inferior in time. These algorithms had approximately the same speed and were one and a half times faster than the Nelder-Mead algorithm and 14 times faster than the genetic algorithm. The Nelder-Mead algorithm and the genetic algorithm have shown the worst accuracy. It was found that all the algorithms are sensitive to initial conditions. The estimate of parameters, on which the autoregressive equation linearly depends, is by an order of magnitude more accurate than that of the parameter on which the auto-regression equation depends in a nonlinear way.https://www.mathmelpub.ru/jour/article/view/224exponential autoregressionm-estimateoptimization methods
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author V. B. Goryainov
W. M. Khing
spellingShingle V. B. Goryainov
W. M. Khing
Comparison of Classical and Robust Estimates of Threshold Auto-regression Parameters
Matematika i Matematičeskoe Modelirovanie
exponential autoregression
m-estimate
optimization methods
author_facet V. B. Goryainov
W. M. Khing
author_sort V. B. Goryainov
title Comparison of Classical and Robust Estimates of Threshold Auto-regression Parameters
title_short Comparison of Classical and Robust Estimates of Threshold Auto-regression Parameters
title_full Comparison of Classical and Robust Estimates of Threshold Auto-regression Parameters
title_fullStr Comparison of Classical and Robust Estimates of Threshold Auto-regression Parameters
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Classical and Robust Estimates of Threshold Auto-regression Parameters
title_sort comparison of classical and robust estimates of threshold auto-regression parameters
publisher MGTU im. N.È. Baumana
series Matematika i Matematičeskoe Modelirovanie
issn 2412-5911
publishDate 2021-02-01
description The exponential auto-regression model is a discrete analog of the second-order nonlinear differential equations of the type of Duffing and van der Pol oscillators. It is used to describe nonlinear stochastic processes with discrete time, such as vehicle vibrations, ship roll, electrical signals in the cerebral cortex. When applying the model in practice, one of the important tasks is its identification, in particular, an estimate of the model parameters from observations of the stochastic process it described. A traditional technique to estimate autoregressive parameters is the nonlinear least squares method. Its disadvantage is high sensitivity to the measurement errors of the process observed. The M-estimate method largely has no such a drawback. The M-estimates are based on the minimization procedure of a non-convex function of several variables. The paper studies the effectiveness of several well-known minimization methods to find the M-estimates of the parameters of an exponential autoregressive model. The paper demonstrates that the sequential quadratic programming algorithm, the active set algorithm, and the interior-point algorithm have shown the best and approximately the same accuracy. The quasi-Newton algorithm is inferior to them in accuracy a little bit, but is not inferior in time. These algorithms had approximately the same speed and were one and a half times faster than the Nelder-Mead algorithm and 14 times faster than the genetic algorithm. The Nelder-Mead algorithm and the genetic algorithm have shown the worst accuracy. It was found that all the algorithms are sensitive to initial conditions. The estimate of parameters, on which the autoregressive equation linearly depends, is by an order of magnitude more accurate than that of the parameter on which the auto-regression equation depends in a nonlinear way.
topic exponential autoregression
m-estimate
optimization methods
url https://www.mathmelpub.ru/jour/article/view/224
work_keys_str_mv AT vbgoryainov comparisonofclassicalandrobustestimatesofthresholdautoregressionparameters
AT wmkhing comparisonofclassicalandrobustestimatesofthresholdautoregressionparameters
_version_ 1721262687257624576