The Importance of Retractions and the Need to Correct the Downstream Literature
Keywords: accountability—corrigendum—erratum—ethics—retraction The past three to four years has seen—as far as can be perceived—what appears to be an increase in retractions (Fanelli 2013), possibly due to an increase in awareness. This awareness relates to the issues underlying science publishing,...
Main Author: | Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SSE
2015-06-01
|
Series: | Journal of Scientific Exploration |
Online Access: | http://journalofscientificexploration.org/index.php/jse/article/view/882 |
Similar Items
-
Corrections in biomedical literature: Errata, expressions of concern, and retractions
by: Keerthi Talari, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01) -
Correcting the literature: Improvement trends seen in contents of retraction notices
by: Evelyne Deculllier, et al.
Published: (2018-07-01) -
Important note! – Retraction
by: Simeon Oka
Published: (2015-01-01) -
Letter to the Editor: Evidence of Bias, Opacity and Lack of Reciprocity by Retraction Watch
by: Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva
Published: (2016-12-01) -
Why does ‘PubPeer’ not acknowledge ‘Retraction Watch’ as a media source?
by: Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva
Published: (2017-05-01)