Effects of care pathways on the in-hospital treatment of heart failure: a systematic review

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Care pathways have become a popular tool to enhance the quality of care by improving patient outcomes, promoting patient safety, increasing patient satisfaction, and optimizing the use of resources. We performed a disease specific sy...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kul Seval, Barbieri Antonella, Milan Erika, Montag Ilke, Vanhaecht Kris, Panella Massimiliano
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-09-01
Series:BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2261/12/81
id doaj-bb014034bd384d78b230ab6f3a0e9d66
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bb014034bd384d78b230ab6f3a0e9d662020-11-25T01:38:39ZengBMCBMC Cardiovascular Disorders1471-22612012-09-011218110.1186/1471-2261-12-81Effects of care pathways on the in-hospital treatment of heart failure: a systematic reviewKul SevalBarbieri AntonellaMilan ErikaMontag IlkeVanhaecht KrisPanella Massimiliano<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Care pathways have become a popular tool to enhance the quality of care by improving patient outcomes, promoting patient safety, increasing patient satisfaction, and optimizing the use of resources. We performed a disease specific systematic review to determine how care pathways in the hospital treatment of heart failure affect in-hospital mortality, length of in-hospital stay, readmission rate and hospitalisation cost when compared with standard care.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Medline, Cinahl, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from 1985 to 2010. Each study was assessed independently by two reviewers. Methodological quality of the included studies was assed using the Jadad methodological approach for randomised controlled trials, controlled clinical trials and the New Castle Ottawa Scale for case–control studies, cohort studies and time interrupted series.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Seven studies met the study inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review with a total sample of 3,690 patients. The combined overall results showed that care pathways have a significant positive effect on mortality and readmission rate. A shorter length of hospital stay was also observed compared with the standard care group. No significant difference was found in the hospitalisation costs. More positive results were observed in controlled trials compared to randomized controlled trials.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>By combining all possible results, it can be concluded that care pathways for treatment of heart failure decrease mortality rates and length of hospital stay, but no statistically significant difference was observed in the readmission rates and hospitalisation costs. However, one should be cautious with overall conclusions: what works for one organization may not work for another because of the subtle differences in processes and bottlenecks.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2261/12/81Care pathwaysHeart failureHospitalisation costsLength of hospital stayMortality rateReadmission rate
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kul Seval
Barbieri Antonella
Milan Erika
Montag Ilke
Vanhaecht Kris
Panella Massimiliano
spellingShingle Kul Seval
Barbieri Antonella
Milan Erika
Montag Ilke
Vanhaecht Kris
Panella Massimiliano
Effects of care pathways on the in-hospital treatment of heart failure: a systematic review
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Care pathways
Heart failure
Hospitalisation costs
Length of hospital stay
Mortality rate
Readmission rate
author_facet Kul Seval
Barbieri Antonella
Milan Erika
Montag Ilke
Vanhaecht Kris
Panella Massimiliano
author_sort Kul Seval
title Effects of care pathways on the in-hospital treatment of heart failure: a systematic review
title_short Effects of care pathways on the in-hospital treatment of heart failure: a systematic review
title_full Effects of care pathways on the in-hospital treatment of heart failure: a systematic review
title_fullStr Effects of care pathways on the in-hospital treatment of heart failure: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Effects of care pathways on the in-hospital treatment of heart failure: a systematic review
title_sort effects of care pathways on the in-hospital treatment of heart failure: a systematic review
publisher BMC
series BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
issn 1471-2261
publishDate 2012-09-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Care pathways have become a popular tool to enhance the quality of care by improving patient outcomes, promoting patient safety, increasing patient satisfaction, and optimizing the use of resources. We performed a disease specific systematic review to determine how care pathways in the hospital treatment of heart failure affect in-hospital mortality, length of in-hospital stay, readmission rate and hospitalisation cost when compared with standard care.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Medline, Cinahl, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from 1985 to 2010. Each study was assessed independently by two reviewers. Methodological quality of the included studies was assed using the Jadad methodological approach for randomised controlled trials, controlled clinical trials and the New Castle Ottawa Scale for case–control studies, cohort studies and time interrupted series.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Seven studies met the study inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review with a total sample of 3,690 patients. The combined overall results showed that care pathways have a significant positive effect on mortality and readmission rate. A shorter length of hospital stay was also observed compared with the standard care group. No significant difference was found in the hospitalisation costs. More positive results were observed in controlled trials compared to randomized controlled trials.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>By combining all possible results, it can be concluded that care pathways for treatment of heart failure decrease mortality rates and length of hospital stay, but no statistically significant difference was observed in the readmission rates and hospitalisation costs. However, one should be cautious with overall conclusions: what works for one organization may not work for another because of the subtle differences in processes and bottlenecks.</p>
topic Care pathways
Heart failure
Hospitalisation costs
Length of hospital stay
Mortality rate
Readmission rate
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2261/12/81
work_keys_str_mv AT kulseval effectsofcarepathwaysontheinhospitaltreatmentofheartfailureasystematicreview
AT barbieriantonella effectsofcarepathwaysontheinhospitaltreatmentofheartfailureasystematicreview
AT milanerika effectsofcarepathwaysontheinhospitaltreatmentofheartfailureasystematicreview
AT montagilke effectsofcarepathwaysontheinhospitaltreatmentofheartfailureasystematicreview
AT vanhaechtkris effectsofcarepathwaysontheinhospitaltreatmentofheartfailureasystematicreview
AT panellamassimiliano effectsofcarepathwaysontheinhospitaltreatmentofheartfailureasystematicreview
_version_ 1725052434482462720