The proportions of “civil order” and “development”

Two attributive principles are inherent to society, which ensure social activities: order and creativity. These two principles are in constant conflict with each other, which forces society into searching for an optimal measure of their correlation. The birth of network structuring of society result...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Krassin Y.A.
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences 2017-06-01
Series:Вестник Института социологии
Subjects:
Online Access:http:///files/File/Vestnik_2017_21/Krasin.pdf
id doaj-baf74943c5754812bd90d254a812d948
record_format Article
spelling doaj-baf74943c5754812bd90d254a812d9482020-11-24T21:24:06ZrusFederal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of SciencesВестник Института социологии2221-16162017-06-0182355110.19181/vis.2017.21.2.453453The proportions of “civil order” and “development”Krassin Y.A.0Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of SciencesTwo attributive principles are inherent to society, which ensure social activities: order and creativity. These two principles are in constant conflict with each other, which forces society into searching for an optimal measure of their correlation. The birth of network structuring of society resulted in the need for such an order, which, while guaranteeing the stability of community life, is equipped with a certain mechanism for regulating the interactions of various private interests, which in turn demands an organic unity of public administration and community self-government. Due to Russia’s socio-cultural peculiarities, the country’s integrity together with public order is provided by the presence of a strong centralized state system, which hampers the implementation of democratic community self-government. This raises a certain question: is it possible for Russia’s existing model of power to undergo an evolutionary democratization during the process of its adaptation to an uprising practice of network connections and interactions?/files/File/Vestnik_2017_21/Krasin.pdfpublic orderdevelopmentinformational societynetwork connectionsstate rulecommunity self-government.
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Krassin Y.A.
spellingShingle Krassin Y.A.
The proportions of “civil order” and “development”
Вестник Института социологии
public order
development
informational society
network connections
state rule
community self-government.
author_facet Krassin Y.A.
author_sort Krassin Y.A.
title The proportions of “civil order” and “development”
title_short The proportions of “civil order” and “development”
title_full The proportions of “civil order” and “development”
title_fullStr The proportions of “civil order” and “development”
title_full_unstemmed The proportions of “civil order” and “development”
title_sort proportions of “civil order” and “development”
publisher Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
series Вестник Института социологии
issn 2221-1616
publishDate 2017-06-01
description Two attributive principles are inherent to society, which ensure social activities: order and creativity. These two principles are in constant conflict with each other, which forces society into searching for an optimal measure of their correlation. The birth of network structuring of society resulted in the need for such an order, which, while guaranteeing the stability of community life, is equipped with a certain mechanism for regulating the interactions of various private interests, which in turn demands an organic unity of public administration and community self-government. Due to Russia’s socio-cultural peculiarities, the country’s integrity together with public order is provided by the presence of a strong centralized state system, which hampers the implementation of democratic community self-government. This raises a certain question: is it possible for Russia’s existing model of power to undergo an evolutionary democratization during the process of its adaptation to an uprising practice of network connections and interactions?
topic public order
development
informational society
network connections
state rule
community self-government.
url http:///files/File/Vestnik_2017_21/Krasin.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT krassinya theproportionsofcivilorderanddevelopment
AT krassinya proportionsofcivilorderanddevelopment
_version_ 1725989687304126464