ATTITUDES AGAINST THE FORM

• Main Author: Semra DOĞAN AK
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Sada Institute of Art and Language Studies 2017-04-01
• Series: Ulakbilge: Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi
• Subjects: Form; The Power; Practice; Tyranny; Endurance; Disturbance
• Online Access: http://www.ulakbilge.com/makale/pdf/1484685154.pdf

In order to start with the thesis of art is the mirror of society reflected upon itself, it is the gereration of silence or talking, pressing down or expressing. These customs become the cacophony spaces like Babel tower with the art fairs, exhibitions and festivals, biennials. Every collection space finds mini-models embodied in each micro-communities. The Babel Tower is mended every time without being ruined or constructed all over. Throgh the first part, the relation is mentioned between the structure of the power and the community. Carnivales, festivals, nuptials and feasts made from public’s reflexes were frozen moments against the power. Kings (which are at present known as presidents, the Pope, pop-stars…) and the public accepted that it is the day to laugh, dance, have fun and speak each other in the same space, at the same time, around the same tamble. Grotesque smile becomes common fun instead of being shameless, odium, rude and ugly. On the contrary, Foucault ideology claims that the power has already noticed it would able to control it instead of censoring. Discovered to watch it by building a close society. There are many exaples of the power to lead the art same way. It is mentioned in the text, how the power materialized evet simple themes as portrait and stil-life paintings. In portrait paintings the power can be even the artist nor the tycoon. When the artist found out what could be done with the portrait art, he dominated the viewer. Then the viewer cannot overcome these dominations or provocations and acts involuntarily. The artist is glad to see these reflexes. In the second part, intolerance of artists and non-representative is given by many examples. The answers of “What taboos are the themes of the artists”, “Is this art?” are analyzed, by the way how far an artist is free to do it. By reported, censored and headlined exampes are studied intolerance limits. With reference to this; the power is born with a few steps forewards by the advantage. The Power, when giving life to contrarierty together, stresses on the constitution of the nature which doesn’t accept any blanks. When the community ressists on it, then refreshs the memory and improves practices. Formerly, conflicts occur slightly, then every resistance creates its own opposition. Remains cannot be destroyed, absorbed or left excluded which are created by the community itself. In the second part of article, reflections of low community endurance and conflicts are analyzed that the power had changed on the contrary of nation-states collapsion. In the third part, the fragmented mikro-powers’ tyranny, endurance and disturbances are analyzed in contrary of clear borders of the powerty.