Radial Access for Coronary Angiography Carries Fewer Complications Compared with Femoral Access: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Background and Aim: In patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography (CA) and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), the benefits associated with radial access compared with the femoral access approach remain controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the short-term eviden...
Main Authors: | Gani Bajraktari, Zarife Rexhaj, Shpend Elezi, Fjolla Zhubi-Bakija, Artan Bajraktari, Ibadete Bytyçi, Arlind Batalli, Michael Y. Henein |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-05-01
|
Series: | Journal of Clinical Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/10/2163 |
Similar Items
-
Long-Term Outcomes of Patients with Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease Treated with Percutaneous Angioplasty versus Bypass Grafting: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
by: Gani Bajraktari, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01) -
The Relationship between Coronary Artery Wall Shear Strain and Plaque Morphology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by: Artan Bajraktari, et al.
Published: (2020-02-01) -
Coronary angiography safety between radial and femoral access
by: Osama Tayeh, et al.
Published: (2014-06-01) -
Different determinants of exercise capacity in HFpEF compared to HFrEF
by: Arlind Batalli, et al.
Published: (2017-04-01) -
Global dyssynchrony correlates with compromised left ventricular filling and stroke volume but not with ejection fraction or QRS duration in HFpEF
by: Pranvera Ibrahimi, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01)