Ethnography and international relations: situating recent trends, debates and limitations from an interdisciplinary perspective

Abstract As a relatively recent academic discipline, international relations engage with ethnography in specific ways, especially since its ethnographic turn starting in the mid-1990s. Conceived as a methodology that may open up the field to new perspectives on studying world politics, ethnography i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jean Michel Montsion
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2018-07-01
Series:The Journal of Chinese Sociology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40711-018-0079-4
id doaj-baba4ee3234849b59690d52f42dcdaf6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-baba4ee3234849b59690d52f42dcdaf62020-11-25T00:37:03ZengSpringerOpenThe Journal of Chinese Sociology2198-26352018-07-015112110.1186/s40711-018-0079-4Ethnography and international relations: situating recent trends, debates and limitations from an interdisciplinary perspectiveJean Michel Montsion0Department of Multidisciplinary Studies, Glendon College, York UniversityAbstract As a relatively recent academic discipline, international relations engage with ethnography in specific ways, especially since its ethnographic turn starting in the mid-1990s. Conceived as a methodology that may open up the field to new perspectives on studying world politics, ethnography is deployed by critical IR scholars in order to ground everyday life as a credible source of knowledge about the international realm. Despite disciplinary and logistical challenges, recent attempts to integrate ethnography into IR can be found in practice-focused research, autoethnography and multi-sited studies. Following an examination of how ethnography has been interpreted and utilised in these cases, the paper will highlight commonalities with debates in other fields, especially social anthropology, to offer new avenues for a richer engagement with ethnography in IR.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40711-018-0079-4DisciplinarityEthnographyInternational relationsMethodology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jean Michel Montsion
spellingShingle Jean Michel Montsion
Ethnography and international relations: situating recent trends, debates and limitations from an interdisciplinary perspective
The Journal of Chinese Sociology
Disciplinarity
Ethnography
International relations
Methodology
author_facet Jean Michel Montsion
author_sort Jean Michel Montsion
title Ethnography and international relations: situating recent trends, debates and limitations from an interdisciplinary perspective
title_short Ethnography and international relations: situating recent trends, debates and limitations from an interdisciplinary perspective
title_full Ethnography and international relations: situating recent trends, debates and limitations from an interdisciplinary perspective
title_fullStr Ethnography and international relations: situating recent trends, debates and limitations from an interdisciplinary perspective
title_full_unstemmed Ethnography and international relations: situating recent trends, debates and limitations from an interdisciplinary perspective
title_sort ethnography and international relations: situating recent trends, debates and limitations from an interdisciplinary perspective
publisher SpringerOpen
series The Journal of Chinese Sociology
issn 2198-2635
publishDate 2018-07-01
description Abstract As a relatively recent academic discipline, international relations engage with ethnography in specific ways, especially since its ethnographic turn starting in the mid-1990s. Conceived as a methodology that may open up the field to new perspectives on studying world politics, ethnography is deployed by critical IR scholars in order to ground everyday life as a credible source of knowledge about the international realm. Despite disciplinary and logistical challenges, recent attempts to integrate ethnography into IR can be found in practice-focused research, autoethnography and multi-sited studies. Following an examination of how ethnography has been interpreted and utilised in these cases, the paper will highlight commonalities with debates in other fields, especially social anthropology, to offer new avenues for a richer engagement with ethnography in IR.
topic Disciplinarity
Ethnography
International relations
Methodology
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40711-018-0079-4
work_keys_str_mv AT jeanmichelmontsion ethnographyandinternationalrelationssituatingrecenttrendsdebatesandlimitationsfromaninterdisciplinaryperspective
_version_ 1725302823195770880