Ethnography and international relations: situating recent trends, debates and limitations from an interdisciplinary perspective
Abstract As a relatively recent academic discipline, international relations engage with ethnography in specific ways, especially since its ethnographic turn starting in the mid-1990s. Conceived as a methodology that may open up the field to new perspectives on studying world politics, ethnography i...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2018-07-01
|
Series: | The Journal of Chinese Sociology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40711-018-0079-4 |
id |
doaj-baba4ee3234849b59690d52f42dcdaf6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-baba4ee3234849b59690d52f42dcdaf62020-11-25T00:37:03ZengSpringerOpenThe Journal of Chinese Sociology2198-26352018-07-015112110.1186/s40711-018-0079-4Ethnography and international relations: situating recent trends, debates and limitations from an interdisciplinary perspectiveJean Michel Montsion0Department of Multidisciplinary Studies, Glendon College, York UniversityAbstract As a relatively recent academic discipline, international relations engage with ethnography in specific ways, especially since its ethnographic turn starting in the mid-1990s. Conceived as a methodology that may open up the field to new perspectives on studying world politics, ethnography is deployed by critical IR scholars in order to ground everyday life as a credible source of knowledge about the international realm. Despite disciplinary and logistical challenges, recent attempts to integrate ethnography into IR can be found in practice-focused research, autoethnography and multi-sited studies. Following an examination of how ethnography has been interpreted and utilised in these cases, the paper will highlight commonalities with debates in other fields, especially social anthropology, to offer new avenues for a richer engagement with ethnography in IR.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40711-018-0079-4DisciplinarityEthnographyInternational relationsMethodology |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jean Michel Montsion |
spellingShingle |
Jean Michel Montsion Ethnography and international relations: situating recent trends, debates and limitations from an interdisciplinary perspective The Journal of Chinese Sociology Disciplinarity Ethnography International relations Methodology |
author_facet |
Jean Michel Montsion |
author_sort |
Jean Michel Montsion |
title |
Ethnography and international relations: situating recent trends, debates and limitations from an interdisciplinary perspective |
title_short |
Ethnography and international relations: situating recent trends, debates and limitations from an interdisciplinary perspective |
title_full |
Ethnography and international relations: situating recent trends, debates and limitations from an interdisciplinary perspective |
title_fullStr |
Ethnography and international relations: situating recent trends, debates and limitations from an interdisciplinary perspective |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ethnography and international relations: situating recent trends, debates and limitations from an interdisciplinary perspective |
title_sort |
ethnography and international relations: situating recent trends, debates and limitations from an interdisciplinary perspective |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
series |
The Journal of Chinese Sociology |
issn |
2198-2635 |
publishDate |
2018-07-01 |
description |
Abstract As a relatively recent academic discipline, international relations engage with ethnography in specific ways, especially since its ethnographic turn starting in the mid-1990s. Conceived as a methodology that may open up the field to new perspectives on studying world politics, ethnography is deployed by critical IR scholars in order to ground everyday life as a credible source of knowledge about the international realm. Despite disciplinary and logistical challenges, recent attempts to integrate ethnography into IR can be found in practice-focused research, autoethnography and multi-sited studies. Following an examination of how ethnography has been interpreted and utilised in these cases, the paper will highlight commonalities with debates in other fields, especially social anthropology, to offer new avenues for a richer engagement with ethnography in IR. |
topic |
Disciplinarity Ethnography International relations Methodology |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40711-018-0079-4 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jeanmichelmontsion ethnographyandinternationalrelationssituatingrecenttrendsdebatesandlimitationsfromaninterdisciplinaryperspective |
_version_ |
1725302823195770880 |