The risk analysis of levee systems: a comparison of international best practices
A risk analysis of a levee system estimates the overall level of flood risk associated with the levee system, according to a series of loading conditions, the levee performance and the vulnerability to flooding of assets in the protected area. This process, which requires the identification and exam...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
EDP Sciences
2016-01-01
|
Series: | E3S Web of Conferences |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160703009 |
id |
doaj-baa5e50f7ccf4632ad2a1c08ef675df7 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-baa5e50f7ccf4632ad2a1c08ef675df72021-03-02T07:34:37ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422016-01-0170300910.1051/e3sconf/20160703009e3sconf_flood2016_03009The risk analysis of levee systems: a comparison of international best practicesTourment R.0Beullac B.1de Leeuw A.2Diermanse F.3Gouldby B.4Wallis M.5IrsteaIrsteaDeltaresDeltaresHR WallingfordHR WallingfordA risk analysis of a levee system estimates the overall level of flood risk associated with the levee system, according to a series of loading conditions, the levee performance and the vulnerability to flooding of assets in the protected area. This process, which requires the identification and examination of all the components that determine the risk of flooding in a system, includes different steps. Among these steps, ‘levee system failure analysis’, ‘flood consequences analysis’ and ‘risk attribution’ have benefitted from the most important advances of recent research projects. This paper presents a critical analysis of the latest methods to conduct levee system failure analysis, flood consequences analysis and risk attribution. It shows how these methods can contribute to improving the efficiency of the risk analysis process and therefore the design and management of levee systems.http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160703009 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Tourment R. Beullac B. de Leeuw A. Diermanse F. Gouldby B. Wallis M. |
spellingShingle |
Tourment R. Beullac B. de Leeuw A. Diermanse F. Gouldby B. Wallis M. The risk analysis of levee systems: a comparison of international best practices E3S Web of Conferences |
author_facet |
Tourment R. Beullac B. de Leeuw A. Diermanse F. Gouldby B. Wallis M. |
author_sort |
Tourment R. |
title |
The risk analysis of levee systems: a comparison of international best practices |
title_short |
The risk analysis of levee systems: a comparison of international best practices |
title_full |
The risk analysis of levee systems: a comparison of international best practices |
title_fullStr |
The risk analysis of levee systems: a comparison of international best practices |
title_full_unstemmed |
The risk analysis of levee systems: a comparison of international best practices |
title_sort |
risk analysis of levee systems: a comparison of international best practices |
publisher |
EDP Sciences |
series |
E3S Web of Conferences |
issn |
2267-1242 |
publishDate |
2016-01-01 |
description |
A risk analysis of a levee system estimates the overall level of flood risk associated with the levee system, according to a series of loading conditions, the levee performance and the vulnerability to flooding of assets in the protected area. This process, which requires the identification and examination of all the components that determine the risk of flooding in a system, includes different steps. Among these steps, ‘levee system failure analysis’, ‘flood consequences analysis’ and ‘risk attribution’ have benefitted from the most important advances of recent research projects. This paper presents a critical analysis of the latest methods to conduct levee system failure analysis, flood consequences analysis and risk attribution. It shows how these methods can contribute to improving the efficiency of the risk analysis process and therefore the design and management of levee systems. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160703009 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT tourmentr theriskanalysisofleveesystemsacomparisonofinternationalbestpractices AT beullacb theriskanalysisofleveesystemsacomparisonofinternationalbestpractices AT deleeuwa theriskanalysisofleveesystemsacomparisonofinternationalbestpractices AT diermansef theriskanalysisofleveesystemsacomparisonofinternationalbestpractices AT gouldbyb theriskanalysisofleveesystemsacomparisonofinternationalbestpractices AT wallism theriskanalysisofleveesystemsacomparisonofinternationalbestpractices AT tourmentr riskanalysisofleveesystemsacomparisonofinternationalbestpractices AT beullacb riskanalysisofleveesystemsacomparisonofinternationalbestpractices AT deleeuwa riskanalysisofleveesystemsacomparisonofinternationalbestpractices AT diermansef riskanalysisofleveesystemsacomparisonofinternationalbestpractices AT gouldbyb riskanalysisofleveesystemsacomparisonofinternationalbestpractices AT wallism riskanalysisofleveesystemsacomparisonofinternationalbestpractices |
_version_ |
1724241223047184384 |