Fernando Távora: The Journey as an Instrument of Experience and Transmission of the Architectural Discipline
For the architect Fernando Távora, master of the “Porto School”, the journey represented part of a methodological progression within his own cultural growth. The journeys themselves were numerous: several trips to Spain, Italy, a trip around Europe in 1949, travelling on the occasion of the CIAM (In...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Athens Institute for Education and Research
2018-01-01
|
Series: | Athens Journal of Architecture |
Online Access: | https://www.athensjournals.gr/architecture/2018-4-1-3-Maddaluno.pdf |
id |
doaj-ba56b7ebc5354c1cbda432dc0b6b55e4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ba56b7ebc5354c1cbda432dc0b6b55e42020-11-25T04:09:00ZengAthens Institute for Education and ResearchAthens Journal of Architecture2407-94722407-94722018-01-01415364https://doi.org/10.30958/aja.4-1-3Fernando Távora: The Journey as an Instrument of Experience and Transmission of the Architectural DisciplineRaffaella Maddaluno0Assistant Professor, University of Lisbon, PortugalFor the architect Fernando Távora, master of the “Porto School”, the journey represented part of a methodological progression within his own cultural growth. The journeys themselves were numerous: several trips to Spain, Italy, a trip around Europe in 1949, travelling on the occasion of the CIAM (International Congresses of Modern Architecture). His years of training culminated in a trip around the world in 1960, thanks to a scholarship from the Gulbenkian Foundation in Lisbon, which allowed him a four-moth trip to the USA, Mexico, Japan, Thailand, Pakistan, Lebanon, Egypt and, finally, Greece. The journey was the medium through which he would mentally and physically build a living relationship, direct, intelligent, without filters of interpretation, with the non-specialist “knowledge” of places and people. He considered the basic principle of “first live, then design” as fundamental to the discipline of a project. During this trip he would write daily, noting the chronology of the events and producing numerous drawings of all the places visited. His journey would come to an end in Athens where finally he reflected on the notion of time and the importance of removing “measurement” at the time of the event. Is there a form of TIME appropriate for transmitting an “architectural lesson”? Is there a practical experience of the journey that the lessons of Fernando Távora have transmitted to those who recognize him as a teacher? The present paper aims to illustrate some of the themes raised in his diary. https://www.athensjournals.gr/architecture/2018-4-1-3-Maddaluno.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Raffaella Maddaluno |
spellingShingle |
Raffaella Maddaluno Fernando Távora: The Journey as an Instrument of Experience and Transmission of the Architectural Discipline Athens Journal of Architecture |
author_facet |
Raffaella Maddaluno |
author_sort |
Raffaella Maddaluno |
title |
Fernando Távora: The Journey as an Instrument of Experience and Transmission of the Architectural Discipline |
title_short |
Fernando Távora: The Journey as an Instrument of Experience and Transmission of the Architectural Discipline |
title_full |
Fernando Távora: The Journey as an Instrument of Experience and Transmission of the Architectural Discipline |
title_fullStr |
Fernando Távora: The Journey as an Instrument of Experience and Transmission of the Architectural Discipline |
title_full_unstemmed |
Fernando Távora: The Journey as an Instrument of Experience and Transmission of the Architectural Discipline |
title_sort |
fernando távora: the journey as an instrument of experience and transmission of the architectural discipline |
publisher |
Athens Institute for Education and Research |
series |
Athens Journal of Architecture |
issn |
2407-9472 2407-9472 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
For the architect Fernando Távora, master of the “Porto School”, the journey represented part of a methodological progression within his own cultural growth. The journeys themselves were numerous: several trips to Spain, Italy, a trip around Europe in 1949, travelling on the occasion of the CIAM (International Congresses of Modern Architecture). His years of training culminated in a trip around the world in 1960, thanks to a scholarship from the Gulbenkian Foundation in Lisbon, which allowed him a four-moth trip to the USA, Mexico, Japan, Thailand, Pakistan, Lebanon, Egypt and, finally, Greece. The journey was the medium through which he would mentally and physically build a living relationship, direct, intelligent, without filters of interpretation, with the non-specialist “knowledge” of places and people. He considered the basic principle of “first live, then design” as fundamental to the discipline of a project. During this trip he would write daily, noting the chronology of the events and producing numerous drawings of all the places visited. His journey would come to an end in Athens where finally he reflected on the notion of time and the importance of removing “measurement” at the time of the event. Is there a form of TIME appropriate for transmitting an “architectural lesson”? Is there a practical experience of the journey that the lessons of Fernando Távora have transmitted to those who recognize him as a teacher? The present paper aims to illustrate some of the themes raised in his diary. |
url |
https://www.athensjournals.gr/architecture/2018-4-1-3-Maddaluno.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT raffaellamaddaluno fernandotavorathejourneyasaninstrumentofexperienceandtransmissionofthearchitecturaldiscipline |
_version_ |
1724423714573910016 |