Fernando Távora: The Journey as an Instrument of Experience and Transmission of the Architectural Discipline

For the architect Fernando Távora, master of the “Porto School”, the journey represented part of a methodological progression within his own cultural growth. The journeys themselves were numerous: several trips to Spain, Italy, a trip around Europe in 1949, travelling on the occasion of the CIAM (In...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Raffaella Maddaluno
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Athens Institute for Education and Research 2018-01-01
Series:Athens Journal of Architecture
Online Access:https://www.athensjournals.gr/architecture/2018-4-1-3-Maddaluno.pdf
id doaj-ba56b7ebc5354c1cbda432dc0b6b55e4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ba56b7ebc5354c1cbda432dc0b6b55e42020-11-25T04:09:00ZengAthens Institute for Education and ResearchAthens Journal of Architecture2407-94722407-94722018-01-01415364https://doi.org/10.30958/aja.4-1-3Fernando Távora: The Journey as an Instrument of Experience and Transmission of the Architectural DisciplineRaffaella Maddaluno0Assistant Professor, University of Lisbon, PortugalFor the architect Fernando Távora, master of the “Porto School”, the journey represented part of a methodological progression within his own cultural growth. The journeys themselves were numerous: several trips to Spain, Italy, a trip around Europe in 1949, travelling on the occasion of the CIAM (International Congresses of Modern Architecture). His years of training culminated in a trip around the world in 1960, thanks to a scholarship from the Gulbenkian Foundation in Lisbon, which allowed him a four-moth trip to the USA, Mexico, Japan, Thailand, Pakistan, Lebanon, Egypt and, finally, Greece. The journey was the medium through which he would mentally and physically build a living relationship, direct, intelligent, without filters of interpretation, with the non-specialist “knowledge” of places and people. He considered the basic principle of “first live, then design” as fundamental to the discipline of a project. During this trip he would write daily, noting the chronology of the events and producing numerous drawings of all the places visited. His journey would come to an end in Athens where finally he reflected on the notion of time and the importance of removing “measurement” at the time of the event. Is there a form of TIME appropriate for transmitting an “architectural lesson”? Is there a practical experience of the journey that the lessons of Fernando Távora have transmitted to those who recognize him as a teacher? The present paper aims to illustrate some of the themes raised in his diary. https://www.athensjournals.gr/architecture/2018-4-1-3-Maddaluno.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Raffaella Maddaluno
spellingShingle Raffaella Maddaluno
Fernando Távora: The Journey as an Instrument of Experience and Transmission of the Architectural Discipline
Athens Journal of Architecture
author_facet Raffaella Maddaluno
author_sort Raffaella Maddaluno
title Fernando Távora: The Journey as an Instrument of Experience and Transmission of the Architectural Discipline
title_short Fernando Távora: The Journey as an Instrument of Experience and Transmission of the Architectural Discipline
title_full Fernando Távora: The Journey as an Instrument of Experience and Transmission of the Architectural Discipline
title_fullStr Fernando Távora: The Journey as an Instrument of Experience and Transmission of the Architectural Discipline
title_full_unstemmed Fernando Távora: The Journey as an Instrument of Experience and Transmission of the Architectural Discipline
title_sort fernando távora: the journey as an instrument of experience and transmission of the architectural discipline
publisher Athens Institute for Education and Research
series Athens Journal of Architecture
issn 2407-9472
2407-9472
publishDate 2018-01-01
description For the architect Fernando Távora, master of the “Porto School”, the journey represented part of a methodological progression within his own cultural growth. The journeys themselves were numerous: several trips to Spain, Italy, a trip around Europe in 1949, travelling on the occasion of the CIAM (International Congresses of Modern Architecture). His years of training culminated in a trip around the world in 1960, thanks to a scholarship from the Gulbenkian Foundation in Lisbon, which allowed him a four-moth trip to the USA, Mexico, Japan, Thailand, Pakistan, Lebanon, Egypt and, finally, Greece. The journey was the medium through which he would mentally and physically build a living relationship, direct, intelligent, without filters of interpretation, with the non-specialist “knowledge” of places and people. He considered the basic principle of “first live, then design” as fundamental to the discipline of a project. During this trip he would write daily, noting the chronology of the events and producing numerous drawings of all the places visited. His journey would come to an end in Athens where finally he reflected on the notion of time and the importance of removing “measurement” at the time of the event. Is there a form of TIME appropriate for transmitting an “architectural lesson”? Is there a practical experience of the journey that the lessons of Fernando Távora have transmitted to those who recognize him as a teacher? The present paper aims to illustrate some of the themes raised in his diary.
url https://www.athensjournals.gr/architecture/2018-4-1-3-Maddaluno.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT raffaellamaddaluno fernandotavorathejourneyasaninstrumentofexperienceandtransmissionofthearchitecturaldiscipline
_version_ 1724423714573910016