Comparison of Two Wavefront Autorefractors: Binocular Open-Field versus Monocular Closed-Field
Purpose. To evaluate the agreement and repeatability between a new commercially available binocular open-field wavefront autorefractor, as part of the Eye Refract system, and a monocular closed-field wavefront autorefractor (VX110). Methods. A cross-sectional, randomized, and single-masked study was...
Main Authors: | Gonzalo Carracedo, Carlos Carpena-Torres, Laura Batres, Maria Serramito, Anahí Gonzalez-Bergaz |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Ophthalmology |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8580471 |
Similar Items
-
Comparison of the Plusoptix S04 binocular autorefractor with cycloplegic refraction performed by an ophthalmologist
by: Laura M. Gilmartin
Published: (2010-08-01) -
Suitability of open-field autorefractors as pupillometers and instrument design effects
by: Carles Otero, et al.
Published: (2017-04-01) -
Assesment of the QuickSee wavefront autorefractor for characterizing refractive errors in school-age children.
by: Andrea Gil, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01) -
Comparison of the Retinomax hand-held autorefractor versus table-top autorefractor and retinoscopy
by: Ibrahim Tuncer, et al.
Published: (2014-06-01) -
Effects of monocular visual field injury on binocular visual field in patients with glaucoma
by: Yan-Zhang Liu, et al.
Published: (2019-09-01)