Mapping Power Law Distributions in Digital Health Social Networks: Methods, Interpretations, and Practical Implications
BackgroundSocial networks are common in digital health. A new stream of research is beginning to investigate the mechanisms of digital health social networks (DHSNs), how they are structured, how they function, and how their growth can be nurtured and managed. DHSNs increase...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
JMIR Publications
2015-06-01
|
Series: | Journal of Medical Internet Research |
Online Access: | http://www.jmir.org/2015/6/e160/ |
id |
doaj-ba4cbfc3605a4d6183e03988fd49c508 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ba4cbfc3605a4d6183e03988fd49c5082021-04-02T18:56:13ZengJMIR PublicationsJournal of Medical Internet Research1438-88712015-06-01176e16010.2196/jmir.4297Mapping Power Law Distributions in Digital Health Social Networks: Methods, Interpretations, and Practical Implicationsvan Mierlo, TrevorHyatt, DouglasChing, Andrew T BackgroundSocial networks are common in digital health. A new stream of research is beginning to investigate the mechanisms of digital health social networks (DHSNs), how they are structured, how they function, and how their growth can be nurtured and managed. DHSNs increase in value when additional content is added, and the structure of networks may resemble the characteristics of power laws. Power laws are contrary to traditional Gaussian averages in that they demonstrate correlated phenomena. ObjectivesThe objective of this study is to investigate whether the distribution frequency in four DHSNs can be characterized as following a power law. A second objective is to describe the method used to determine the comparison. MethodsData from four DHSNs—Alcohol Help Center (AHC), Depression Center (DC), Panic Center (PC), and Stop Smoking Center (SSC)—were compared to power law distributions. To assist future researchers and managers, the 5-step methodology used to analyze and compare datasets is described. ResultsAll four DHSNs were found to have right-skewed distributions, indicating the data were not normally distributed. When power trend lines were added to each frequency distribution, R2 values indicated that, to a very high degree, the variance in post frequencies can be explained by actor rank (AHC .962, DC .975, PC .969, SSC .95). Spearman correlations provided further indication of the strength and statistical significance of the relationship (AHC .987. DC .967, PC .983, SSC .993, P<.001). ConclusionsThis is the first study to investigate power distributions across multiple DHSNs, each addressing a unique condition. Results indicate that despite vast differences in theme, content, and length of existence, DHSNs follow properties of power laws. The structure of DHSNs is important as it gives insight to researchers and managers into the nature and mechanisms of network functionality. The 5-step process undertaken to compare actor contribution patterns can be replicated in networks that are managed by other organizations, and we conjecture that patterns observed in this study could be found in other DHSNs. Future research should analyze network growth over time and examine the characteristics and survival rates of superusers.http://www.jmir.org/2015/6/e160/ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
van Mierlo, Trevor Hyatt, Douglas Ching, Andrew T |
spellingShingle |
van Mierlo, Trevor Hyatt, Douglas Ching, Andrew T Mapping Power Law Distributions in Digital Health Social Networks: Methods, Interpretations, and Practical Implications Journal of Medical Internet Research |
author_facet |
van Mierlo, Trevor Hyatt, Douglas Ching, Andrew T |
author_sort |
van Mierlo, Trevor |
title |
Mapping Power Law Distributions in Digital Health Social Networks: Methods, Interpretations, and Practical Implications |
title_short |
Mapping Power Law Distributions in Digital Health Social Networks: Methods, Interpretations, and Practical Implications |
title_full |
Mapping Power Law Distributions in Digital Health Social Networks: Methods, Interpretations, and Practical Implications |
title_fullStr |
Mapping Power Law Distributions in Digital Health Social Networks: Methods, Interpretations, and Practical Implications |
title_full_unstemmed |
Mapping Power Law Distributions in Digital Health Social Networks: Methods, Interpretations, and Practical Implications |
title_sort |
mapping power law distributions in digital health social networks: methods, interpretations, and practical implications |
publisher |
JMIR Publications |
series |
Journal of Medical Internet Research |
issn |
1438-8871 |
publishDate |
2015-06-01 |
description |
BackgroundSocial networks are common in digital health. A new stream of research is beginning to investigate the mechanisms of digital health social networks (DHSNs), how they are structured, how they function, and how their growth can be nurtured and managed. DHSNs increase in value when additional content is added, and the structure of networks may resemble the characteristics of power laws. Power laws are contrary to traditional Gaussian averages in that they demonstrate correlated phenomena.
ObjectivesThe objective of this study is to investigate whether the distribution frequency in four DHSNs can be characterized as following a power law. A second objective is to describe the method used to determine the comparison.
MethodsData from four DHSNs—Alcohol Help Center (AHC), Depression Center (DC), Panic Center (PC), and Stop Smoking Center (SSC)—were compared to power law distributions. To assist future researchers and managers, the 5-step methodology used to analyze and compare datasets is described.
ResultsAll four DHSNs were found to have right-skewed distributions, indicating the data were not normally distributed. When power trend lines were added to each frequency distribution, R2 values indicated that, to a very high degree, the variance in post frequencies can be explained by actor rank (AHC .962, DC .975, PC .969, SSC .95). Spearman correlations provided further indication of the strength and statistical significance of the relationship (AHC .987. DC .967, PC .983, SSC .993, P<.001).
ConclusionsThis is the first study to investigate power distributions across multiple DHSNs, each addressing a unique condition. Results indicate that despite vast differences in theme, content, and length of existence, DHSNs follow properties of power laws. The structure of DHSNs is important as it gives insight to researchers and managers into the nature and mechanisms of network functionality. The 5-step process undertaken to compare actor contribution patterns can be replicated in networks that are managed by other organizations, and we conjecture that patterns observed in this study could be found in other DHSNs. Future research should analyze network growth over time and examine the characteristics and survival rates of superusers. |
url |
http://www.jmir.org/2015/6/e160/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT vanmierlotrevor mappingpowerlawdistributionsindigitalhealthsocialnetworksmethodsinterpretationsandpracticalimplications AT hyattdouglas mappingpowerlawdistributionsindigitalhealthsocialnetworksmethodsinterpretationsandpracticalimplications AT chingandrewt mappingpowerlawdistributionsindigitalhealthsocialnetworksmethodsinterpretationsandpracticalimplications |
_version_ |
1721550542307590144 |