Differences Between Traditional and Distance Education Academic Performances: A Meta-Analytic Approach

This meta-analysis research estimated and compared the differences between the academic performance of students enrolled in distance education courses relative to those enrolled in traditional settings, as demonstrated by their final course grades/ scores within the 1990-2002 period.Eighty-six exper...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mickey Shachar, Yoram Neumann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Athabasca University Press 2003-10-01
Series:International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning
Subjects:
USA
Online Access:http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/153/234
id doaj-ba3b6ab01afb41c0abb39cae910c7851
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ba3b6ab01afb41c0abb39cae910c78512020-11-25T01:14:55ZengAthabasca University PressInternational Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning1492-38312003-10-0142Differences Between Traditional and Distance Education Academic Performances: A Meta-Analytic ApproachMickey ShacharYoram NeumannThis meta-analysis research estimated and compared the differences between the academic performance of students enrolled in distance education courses relative to those enrolled in traditional settings, as demonstrated by their final course grades/ scores within the 1990-2002 period.Eighty-six experimental and quasi-experimental studies met the established inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis (including data from over 15,000 participating students), and provided effect sizes, clearly demonstrating that: 1) in two thirds of the cases, students taking courses by distance education outperformed their student counterparts enrolled in traditionally instructed courses; 2) the overall effect size d+ was calculated as 0.37 standard deviation units (0.33 < 95% confidence interval < 0.40); and (3) this effect size of 0.37 indicates the mean percentile standing of the DE group is at the 65th percentile of the traditional group (mean defined as the 50th percentile).http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/153/234meta-analysisstatisticsquantiative studyUSA
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mickey Shachar
Yoram Neumann
spellingShingle Mickey Shachar
Yoram Neumann
Differences Between Traditional and Distance Education Academic Performances: A Meta-Analytic Approach
International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning
meta-analysis
statistics
quantiative study
USA
author_facet Mickey Shachar
Yoram Neumann
author_sort Mickey Shachar
title Differences Between Traditional and Distance Education Academic Performances: A Meta-Analytic Approach
title_short Differences Between Traditional and Distance Education Academic Performances: A Meta-Analytic Approach
title_full Differences Between Traditional and Distance Education Academic Performances: A Meta-Analytic Approach
title_fullStr Differences Between Traditional and Distance Education Academic Performances: A Meta-Analytic Approach
title_full_unstemmed Differences Between Traditional and Distance Education Academic Performances: A Meta-Analytic Approach
title_sort differences between traditional and distance education academic performances: a meta-analytic approach
publisher Athabasca University Press
series International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning
issn 1492-3831
publishDate 2003-10-01
description This meta-analysis research estimated and compared the differences between the academic performance of students enrolled in distance education courses relative to those enrolled in traditional settings, as demonstrated by their final course grades/ scores within the 1990-2002 period.Eighty-six experimental and quasi-experimental studies met the established inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis (including data from over 15,000 participating students), and provided effect sizes, clearly demonstrating that: 1) in two thirds of the cases, students taking courses by distance education outperformed their student counterparts enrolled in traditionally instructed courses; 2) the overall effect size d+ was calculated as 0.37 standard deviation units (0.33 < 95% confidence interval < 0.40); and (3) this effect size of 0.37 indicates the mean percentile standing of the DE group is at the 65th percentile of the traditional group (mean defined as the 50th percentile).
topic meta-analysis
statistics
quantiative study
USA
url http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/153/234
work_keys_str_mv AT mickeyshachar differencesbetweentraditionalanddistanceeducationacademicperformancesametaanalyticapproach
AT yoramneumann differencesbetweentraditionalanddistanceeducationacademicperformancesametaanalyticapproach
_version_ 1715816830355898368