Excavating theory in teacher evaluation: Implementing evaluation frameworks as Wengerian boundary objects

The purpose of this paper is to begin to excavate the unstated theoretical underpinnings of teacher evaluation systems as they exist in policy and practice and to explicitly consider how these evaluation systems might intersect theoretically with social learning theory. Research suggests that organi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kelley M. King, Noelle A. Paufler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Arizona State University 2020-04-01
Series:Education Policy Analysis Archives
Subjects:
Online Access:https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/5020
id doaj-ba3a586982ed4a7593745a5cf97bac80
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ba3a586982ed4a7593745a5cf97bac802020-11-25T02:06:53ZengArizona State UniversityEducation Policy Analysis Archives1068-23412020-04-0128010.14507/epaa.28.50202080Excavating theory in teacher evaluation: Implementing evaluation frameworks as Wengerian boundary objectsKelley M. King0Noelle A. Paufler1University of North TexasClemson UniversityThe purpose of this paper is to begin to excavate the unstated theoretical underpinnings of teacher evaluation systems as they exist in policy and practice and to explicitly consider how these evaluation systems might intersect theoretically with social learning theory. Research suggests that organizational leaders believe growth-based evaluation practices have yet-untapped potential to support teacher learning within teacher communities. However, models of teacher evaluation, as defined in federal and state policy and developed and implemented in practice, rarely make explicit the theoretical and conceptual frameworks upon which they are based. Further, evaluation models do not explicitly intersect with the conceptual frameworks for such learning, e.g., communities of practice (CoPs) and social learning theory. Rather, the role of teacher evaluation in social learning within and across educational organizations remains under-theorized. We argue for research examining potential connections in theory and practice between two existing conceptual frameworks: 1) social learning theory and 2) teacher evaluation systems (understood as policy, models, and practices).https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/5020teacher evaluationsocial learning theorycommunities of practice
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kelley M. King
Noelle A. Paufler
spellingShingle Kelley M. King
Noelle A. Paufler
Excavating theory in teacher evaluation: Implementing evaluation frameworks as Wengerian boundary objects
Education Policy Analysis Archives
teacher evaluation
social learning theory
communities of practice
author_facet Kelley M. King
Noelle A. Paufler
author_sort Kelley M. King
title Excavating theory in teacher evaluation: Implementing evaluation frameworks as Wengerian boundary objects
title_short Excavating theory in teacher evaluation: Implementing evaluation frameworks as Wengerian boundary objects
title_full Excavating theory in teacher evaluation: Implementing evaluation frameworks as Wengerian boundary objects
title_fullStr Excavating theory in teacher evaluation: Implementing evaluation frameworks as Wengerian boundary objects
title_full_unstemmed Excavating theory in teacher evaluation: Implementing evaluation frameworks as Wengerian boundary objects
title_sort excavating theory in teacher evaluation: implementing evaluation frameworks as wengerian boundary objects
publisher Arizona State University
series Education Policy Analysis Archives
issn 1068-2341
publishDate 2020-04-01
description The purpose of this paper is to begin to excavate the unstated theoretical underpinnings of teacher evaluation systems as they exist in policy and practice and to explicitly consider how these evaluation systems might intersect theoretically with social learning theory. Research suggests that organizational leaders believe growth-based evaluation practices have yet-untapped potential to support teacher learning within teacher communities. However, models of teacher evaluation, as defined in federal and state policy and developed and implemented in practice, rarely make explicit the theoretical and conceptual frameworks upon which they are based. Further, evaluation models do not explicitly intersect with the conceptual frameworks for such learning, e.g., communities of practice (CoPs) and social learning theory. Rather, the role of teacher evaluation in social learning within and across educational organizations remains under-theorized. We argue for research examining potential connections in theory and practice between two existing conceptual frameworks: 1) social learning theory and 2) teacher evaluation systems (understood as policy, models, and practices).
topic teacher evaluation
social learning theory
communities of practice
url https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/5020
work_keys_str_mv AT kelleymking excavatingtheoryinteacherevaluationimplementingevaluationframeworksaswengerianboundaryobjects
AT noelleapaufler excavatingtheoryinteacherevaluationimplementingevaluationframeworksaswengerianboundaryobjects
_version_ 1724932181240840192