Art investment in South Africa: Portfolio diversification and art market efficiency

Art has been suggested as a good way to diversify investment portfolios during times of financial uncertainty. The argument is that art exhibits different risk and return characteristics to conventional investments in other asset classes. The new Citadel art price index offered the opportunity to te...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ferdi Botha, Jen Snowball, Brett Scott
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AOSIS 2016-09-01
Series:South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences
Online Access:https://sajems.org/index.php/sajems/article/view/1397
id doaj-ba2c1d6b238c4d0f984a40160d9512a8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ba2c1d6b238c4d0f984a40160d9512a82020-11-24T23:40:54ZengAOSISSouth African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences1015-88122222-34362016-09-0119335836810.4102/sajems.v19i3.1397517Art investment in South Africa: Portfolio diversification and art market efficiencyFerdi Botha0Jen Snowball1Brett ScottRhodes UniversityRhodes UniversityArt has been suggested as a good way to diversify investment portfolios during times of financial uncertainty. The argument is that art exhibits different risk and return characteristics to conventional investments in other asset classes. The new Citadel art price index offered the opportunity to test this theory in the South African context. Moreover, this paper tests whether art prices are efficient. The Citadel index uses the hedonic regression method with observations drawn from the top 100, 50 and 20 artists by sales volume, giving approximately 29 503 total auction observations. The Index consists of quarterly data from the period 2000Q1 to 2013Q3. A vector autoregression of the art price index, Johannesburg stock exchange all-share index, house price index, and South African government bond index were used. Results show that, when there are increased returns on the stock market in a preceding period and wealth increases, there is a change in the Citadel art price index in the same direction. No significant difference was found between the house price index and the art price index, or between the art and government bond price indices. The art market is also found to be inefficient, thereby exacerbating the risk of investing in art. Overall, the South African art market does not offer the opportunity to diversify portfolios dominated by either property, bonds, or shares.https://sajems.org/index.php/sajems/article/view/1397
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ferdi Botha
Jen Snowball
Brett Scott
spellingShingle Ferdi Botha
Jen Snowball
Brett Scott
Art investment in South Africa: Portfolio diversification and art market efficiency
South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences
author_facet Ferdi Botha
Jen Snowball
Brett Scott
author_sort Ferdi Botha
title Art investment in South Africa: Portfolio diversification and art market efficiency
title_short Art investment in South Africa: Portfolio diversification and art market efficiency
title_full Art investment in South Africa: Portfolio diversification and art market efficiency
title_fullStr Art investment in South Africa: Portfolio diversification and art market efficiency
title_full_unstemmed Art investment in South Africa: Portfolio diversification and art market efficiency
title_sort art investment in south africa: portfolio diversification and art market efficiency
publisher AOSIS
series South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences
issn 1015-8812
2222-3436
publishDate 2016-09-01
description Art has been suggested as a good way to diversify investment portfolios during times of financial uncertainty. The argument is that art exhibits different risk and return characteristics to conventional investments in other asset classes. The new Citadel art price index offered the opportunity to test this theory in the South African context. Moreover, this paper tests whether art prices are efficient. The Citadel index uses the hedonic regression method with observations drawn from the top 100, 50 and 20 artists by sales volume, giving approximately 29 503 total auction observations. The Index consists of quarterly data from the period 2000Q1 to 2013Q3. A vector autoregression of the art price index, Johannesburg stock exchange all-share index, house price index, and South African government bond index were used. Results show that, when there are increased returns on the stock market in a preceding period and wealth increases, there is a change in the Citadel art price index in the same direction. No significant difference was found between the house price index and the art price index, or between the art and government bond price indices. The art market is also found to be inefficient, thereby exacerbating the risk of investing in art. Overall, the South African art market does not offer the opportunity to diversify portfolios dominated by either property, bonds, or shares.
url https://sajems.org/index.php/sajems/article/view/1397
work_keys_str_mv AT ferdibotha artinvestmentinsouthafricaportfoliodiversificationandartmarketefficiency
AT jensnowball artinvestmentinsouthafricaportfoliodiversificationandartmarketefficiency
AT brettscott artinvestmentinsouthafricaportfoliodiversificationandartmarketefficiency
_version_ 1725508760688918528