Researcher development in universities: Origins and historical context

This article explores the origins of researcher development in British universities. Its principal aim is to provide a coherent, and reasonably succinct, account of the evolution and development of researcher development that is as consistent as possible with what is known about the development of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Asher Rospigliosi, Tom Bourner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UCL Press 2019-06-01
Series:London Review of Education
Online Access:https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=27a512ce-f35d-42c7-b7f7-c8d8e4fa7b05
id doaj-ba18b630cdb3406cb6d0bebfaebe50fe
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ba18b630cdb3406cb6d0bebfaebe50fe2020-12-16T09:46:09ZengUCL PressLondon Review of Education1474-84792019-06-0110.18546/LRE.17.2.08Researcher development in universities: Origins and historical contextAsher RospigliosiTom BournerThis article explores the origins of researcher development in British universities. Its principal aim is to provide a coherent, and reasonably succinct, account of the evolution and development of researcher development that is as consistent as possible with what is known about the development of the Western university, the history of the research doctorate and the emergence of the research university. The main conclusion is that the origins of researcher development in the modern university can be found in the philology of the early modern university, which in turn emerged from the accumulation of knowledge in Western Christendom from other places and other times. Other conclusions are that there was little researcher development in the medieval university, and that the 'traditional' model of researcher development, centred on the PhD, is much more recent than is commonly supposed, so that, from a long-term perspective, the 'traditional model' may be but one stage in its continuing development. The article also develops a model that locates researcher development within a series of intellectual contexts: from the research process itself, to the advancement of knowledge more generally, and, finally, to changes in conceptions of knowledge itself.https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=27a512ce-f35d-42c7-b7f7-c8d8e4fa7b05
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Asher Rospigliosi
Tom Bourner
spellingShingle Asher Rospigliosi
Tom Bourner
Researcher development in universities: Origins and historical context
London Review of Education
author_facet Asher Rospigliosi
Tom Bourner
author_sort Asher Rospigliosi
title Researcher development in universities: Origins and historical context
title_short Researcher development in universities: Origins and historical context
title_full Researcher development in universities: Origins and historical context
title_fullStr Researcher development in universities: Origins and historical context
title_full_unstemmed Researcher development in universities: Origins and historical context
title_sort researcher development in universities: origins and historical context
publisher UCL Press
series London Review of Education
issn 1474-8479
publishDate 2019-06-01
description This article explores the origins of researcher development in British universities. Its principal aim is to provide a coherent, and reasonably succinct, account of the evolution and development of researcher development that is as consistent as possible with what is known about the development of the Western university, the history of the research doctorate and the emergence of the research university. The main conclusion is that the origins of researcher development in the modern university can be found in the philology of the early modern university, which in turn emerged from the accumulation of knowledge in Western Christendom from other places and other times. Other conclusions are that there was little researcher development in the medieval university, and that the 'traditional' model of researcher development, centred on the PhD, is much more recent than is commonly supposed, so that, from a long-term perspective, the 'traditional model' may be but one stage in its continuing development. The article also develops a model that locates researcher development within a series of intellectual contexts: from the research process itself, to the advancement of knowledge more generally, and, finally, to changes in conceptions of knowledge itself.
url https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=27a512ce-f35d-42c7-b7f7-c8d8e4fa7b05
work_keys_str_mv AT asherrospigliosi researcherdevelopmentinuniversitiesoriginsandhistoricalcontext
AT tombourner researcherdevelopmentinuniversitiesoriginsandhistoricalcontext
_version_ 1724381312110821376