The public of parks: In between observation and action. The example of Paris

How can we integrate a social dimension in the design and construction of public parks and gardens? More precisely, how can we assign a role to users and urbanites in public parks’ projects? Our hypothesis is that social sciences can play a double role with local populations: a cognitive role, which...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Michèle Jolé
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Urbanistični inštitut RS 2008-01-01
Series:Urbani Izziv
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urbani-izziv.uirs.si/Portals/uizziv/papers/urbani-izziv-en-2008-19-02-007.pdf
id doaj-ba15b7040cca4a33a623233de473e340
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ba15b7040cca4a33a623233de473e3402021-10-02T02:44:10ZengUrbanistični inštitut RSUrbani Izziv0353-64831855-83992008-01-01192169173The public of parks: In between observation and action. The example of ParisMichèle JoléHow can we integrate a social dimension in the design and construction of public parks and gardens? More precisely, how can we assign a role to users and urbanites in public parks’ projects? Our hypothesis is that social sciences can play a double role with local populations: a cognitive role, which consists in describing uses and social dynamics at work in civil society, and a mediating role, between inhabitants and agents of design, construction and maintenance of parks. Both of these roles are linked through careful attention to the sites, which requires an empirical approach defined in this paper as an ethnographic approach. The methodology applied in Paris for several years is interrogated using several American approaches. Two examples are then discussed: the Parc Floral de Paris and the Jardins d’Eole where sociology was applied in a different way. The various modes used by social sciences to work on parks suggest that we should think about a new “distribution of tasks” between the different players of a design project, including the inhabitants, who are users as well as citizens.http://urbani-izziv.uirs.si/Portals/uizziv/papers/urbani-izziv-en-2008-19-02-007.pdfdesignpublic spacesocial sciencesusers and usescoproduction
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michèle Jolé
spellingShingle Michèle Jolé
The public of parks: In between observation and action. The example of Paris
Urbani Izziv
design
public space
social sciences
users and uses
coproduction
author_facet Michèle Jolé
author_sort Michèle Jolé
title The public of parks: In between observation and action. The example of Paris
title_short The public of parks: In between observation and action. The example of Paris
title_full The public of parks: In between observation and action. The example of Paris
title_fullStr The public of parks: In between observation and action. The example of Paris
title_full_unstemmed The public of parks: In between observation and action. The example of Paris
title_sort public of parks: in between observation and action. the example of paris
publisher Urbanistični inštitut RS
series Urbani Izziv
issn 0353-6483
1855-8399
publishDate 2008-01-01
description How can we integrate a social dimension in the design and construction of public parks and gardens? More precisely, how can we assign a role to users and urbanites in public parks’ projects? Our hypothesis is that social sciences can play a double role with local populations: a cognitive role, which consists in describing uses and social dynamics at work in civil society, and a mediating role, between inhabitants and agents of design, construction and maintenance of parks. Both of these roles are linked through careful attention to the sites, which requires an empirical approach defined in this paper as an ethnographic approach. The methodology applied in Paris for several years is interrogated using several American approaches. Two examples are then discussed: the Parc Floral de Paris and the Jardins d’Eole where sociology was applied in a different way. The various modes used by social sciences to work on parks suggest that we should think about a new “distribution of tasks” between the different players of a design project, including the inhabitants, who are users as well as citizens.
topic design
public space
social sciences
users and uses
coproduction
url http://urbani-izziv.uirs.si/Portals/uizziv/papers/urbani-izziv-en-2008-19-02-007.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT michelejole thepublicofparksinbetweenobservationandactiontheexampleofparis
AT michelejole publicofparksinbetweenobservationandactiontheexampleofparis
_version_ 1716860248397971456