A Quality Approach to Qualitative Content Analysis: Similarities and Differences Compared to Other Qualitative Methods
Qualitative content analysis is a method that shares many of the unique attributes associated with all qualitative research methods. These shared attributes extend to a key consideration in all qualitative research designs, i.e., the integration of quality concepts at each step of the research proce...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
FQS
2019-09-01
|
Series: | Forum: Qualitative Social Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/3385 |
id |
doaj-ba145295b8da4f7a86df11c47362636f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ba145295b8da4f7a86df11c47362636f2020-11-25T02:06:39ZdeuFQS Forum: Qualitative Social Research1438-56272019-09-0120310.17169/fqs-20.3.33852046A Quality Approach to Qualitative Content Analysis: Similarities and Differences Compared to Other Qualitative MethodsMargaret R. RollerQualitative content analysis is a method that shares many of the unique attributes associated with all qualitative research methods. These shared attributes extend to a key consideration in all qualitative research designs, i.e., the integration of quality concepts at each step of the research process. In this article I discuss one such approach, the total quality framework. With this framework at hand, researchers can think about quality in qualitative research regardless of the qualitative method, including qualitative content analysis. For example, quality constructs associated with sampling, researcher effects, and data verification in qualitative content analysis are not unlike those in the in-depth interview, focus group, or observation method. There are, however, a few quality considerations distinctive to the qualitative content analysis method, such as the definition of "data" and the necessary thick description associated with the two-phase, eight-step qualitative content analysis process. In this article I discuss the similarities and differences between the qualitative content analysis method and other qualitative methods from a quality perspective; specifically, the total quality framework.http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/3385qualitative content analysisqualitative researchqualitative methodsquality criteriatotal quality framework |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
deu |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Margaret R. Roller |
spellingShingle |
Margaret R. Roller A Quality Approach to Qualitative Content Analysis: Similarities and Differences Compared to Other Qualitative Methods Forum: Qualitative Social Research qualitative content analysis qualitative research qualitative methods quality criteria total quality framework |
author_facet |
Margaret R. Roller |
author_sort |
Margaret R. Roller |
title |
A Quality Approach to Qualitative Content Analysis: Similarities and Differences Compared to Other Qualitative Methods |
title_short |
A Quality Approach to Qualitative Content Analysis: Similarities and Differences Compared to Other Qualitative Methods |
title_full |
A Quality Approach to Qualitative Content Analysis: Similarities and Differences Compared to Other Qualitative Methods |
title_fullStr |
A Quality Approach to Qualitative Content Analysis: Similarities and Differences Compared to Other Qualitative Methods |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Quality Approach to Qualitative Content Analysis: Similarities and Differences Compared to Other Qualitative Methods |
title_sort |
quality approach to qualitative content analysis: similarities and differences compared to other qualitative methods |
publisher |
FQS |
series |
Forum: Qualitative Social Research |
issn |
1438-5627 |
publishDate |
2019-09-01 |
description |
Qualitative content analysis is a method that shares many of the unique attributes associated with all qualitative research methods. These shared attributes extend to a key consideration in all qualitative research designs, i.e., the integration of quality concepts at each step of the research process. In this article I discuss one such approach, the total quality framework. With this framework at hand, researchers can think about quality in qualitative research regardless of the qualitative method, including qualitative content analysis. For example, quality constructs associated with sampling, researcher effects, and data verification in qualitative content analysis are not unlike those in the in-depth interview, focus group, or observation method. There are, however, a few quality considerations distinctive to the qualitative content analysis method, such as the definition of "data" and the necessary thick description associated with the two-phase, eight-step qualitative content analysis process. In this article I discuss the similarities and differences between the qualitative content analysis method and other qualitative methods from a quality perspective; specifically, the total quality framework. |
topic |
qualitative content analysis qualitative research qualitative methods quality criteria total quality framework |
url |
http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/3385 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT margaretrroller aqualityapproachtoqualitativecontentanalysissimilaritiesanddifferencescomparedtootherqualitativemethods AT margaretrroller qualityapproachtoqualitativecontentanalysissimilaritiesanddifferencescomparedtootherqualitativemethods |
_version_ |
1724932760701763584 |